10-K

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected to not use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value, as of June 30, 2021, of the shares of beneficial interest, par value $1.00 per share, of the Registrant held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $191.4 million. (Aggregate market value is estimated solely for the purposes of this report and shall not be construed as an admission for the purposes of determining affiliate status.)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐

On March 11, 2022, 80,616,801 shares of beneficial interest, par value $1.00 per share, of the Registrant were outstanding.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contain certain forward-looking statements that can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” ”expect,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans, strategies, anticipated events, trends and other matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, achievements or results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, our business might be materially and adversely affected by the following:

Additional factors that might cause future events, achievements or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include those discussed in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

Except as the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company” and “PREIT” refer to Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and its subsidiaries, including our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “PREIT Associates” or to the “Operating Partnership” refer to PREIT Associates, L.P.

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:

PREIT, a Pennsylvania business trust founded in 1960 and one of the first equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) in the United States, has a primary investment focus on retail shopping malls located in the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region.

We currently own interests in 25 retail properties, of which 24 are operating properties and one is a development property. The 24 operating properties include 20 shopping malls and four other retail properties, have a total of 19.6 million square feet and are located in eight states. We and partnerships in which we hold an interest own 15.1 million square feet at these properties (excluding space owned by anchors or third parties). There are 17 operating retail properties in our portfolio that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes. These consolidated properties have a total of 14.6 million square feet, of which we own 11.4 million square feet. The seven operating retail properties that are owned by unconsolidated partnerships with third parties have a total of 5.0 million square feet, of which 3.6 million square feet are owned by such partnerships. When we refer to “Same Store” properties, we are referring to properties that have been owned for the full periods presented and excluding properties acquired, disposed of, under redevelopment or designated as a non-core property during the periods presented. Core properties include all operating retail properties except for Exton Square Mall. Valley View Mall was previously designated as a non-core property. As discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, a foreclosure sale judgment was ordered by the court after the property operations were assumed by a receiver on behalf of the lender under the mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall and we no longer operate the property. “Core Malls” also excludes these properties as well as power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.

We have one property in our portfolio that is classified as under development; however, we do not currently have any activity occurring at this property.

Fashion District Philadelphia opened on September 19, 2019. Fashion District Philadelphia is an aggregation of properties spanning three blocks in downtown Philadelphia that were formerly known as Gallery I, Gallery II and 907 Market Street. Joining Century 21 (which subsequently closed in 2020) and Burlington in 2019 were multiple dining and entertainment venues including Market Eats, a multi-offering food court, City Winery, AMC Theatres, and Round 1 Bowling & Amusement. In addition, Nike Factory Store, Ulta, H & M, and Primark have opened Philadelphia flagship stores at the property since its opening in September 2019. Fashion District Philadelphia is owned by our joint venture entity with our joint venture partner, the Macerich Company (“Macerich”). As of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the operations of Fashion District Philadelphia.

We are a fully integrated, self-managed and self-administered REIT that has elected to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. In general, we are required each year to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our net taxable income and to meet certain other requirements in order to maintain the favorable tax treatment associated with qualifying as a REIT.

We are primarily engaged in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, redevelopment, and disposition of shopping malls. We believe our distinctive real estate is at the forefront of enabling communities to flourish through the built environment by providing opportunities to create vibrant multi-use destinations. In general, our malls include carefully curated retail and lifestyle offerings, including national and regional department stores, large format retailers and other anchors, mixed with destination dining and entertainment experiences. In recent years, we have increased the portion of our mall properties that are leased to non-traditional mall tenants, including life sciences, healthcare, supermarkets, fulfillment centers and self-storage facilities. Approximately 29.4% of our mall space is committed to non-traditional tenants offering services such as dining and entertainment, health and wellness, off-price retail and fast fashion.

To enhance the experience for shoppers, most of our malls have restaurants and/or food courts, and some of the malls have multi-screen movie theaters and other entertainment options, either as part of the mall or on outparcels around the perimeter of the mall property. In addition, many of our malls have outparcels containing restaurants, banks or other stores. Our malls frequently serve as a central place for community, promotional and charitable events in their geographic trade areas.

The largest core mall in our retail portfolio is 1.4 million square feet and contains 175 stores, and the smallest core mall is 0.5 million square feet and contains 79 stores. The other properties in our retail portfolio range from 377,000 to 778,000 square feet.

We derive the substantial majority of our revenue from rent received under leases with tenants for space at retail properties in our real estate portfolio. In general, our leases require tenants to pay minimum rent, which is a fixed amount specified in the lease, and which is often subject to scheduled increases during the term of the lease for longer term leases. In 2021, 79% of the new leases that we signed contained scheduled rent increases, and these increases, which are typically scheduled to occur between two and four times during the term, ranged from 2.0% to 10.0%, with approximately 96% ranging from 2.0% to 4.0%. In addition or in the alternative, certain tenants are required to pay percentage rent, which can be either a percentage of their sales revenue that exceeds certain levels specified in their lease agreements, or a percentage of their total sales revenue.

The majority of our leases also provide that the tenant will reimburse us for certain expenses relating to the property for common area maintenance (“CAM”), real estate taxes, utilities, insurance and other operating expenses incurred in the operation of the property subject, in some cases, to certain limitations. The proportion of the expenses for which tenants are responsible was historically related to the tenant’s pro rata share of space at the property. We have continued to shift the CAM provision in our leases to be a fixed amount, which gives greater predictability to tenants, and a majority of such revenue is derived from leases specifying fixed CAM reimbursements.

Retail real estate industry participants sometimes classify malls based on the average sales per square foot of non-anchor mall tenants occupying spaces under 10,000 square feet in size, the population and average household income of the trade area and the geographic market, the growth rates of the population and average household income in the trade area and geographic market, and numerous other factors. Based on these factors, in general, malls that have high average sales per square foot and are in trade areas with large populations and high household incomes and/or growth rates are considered Class A malls, malls with average sales per square foot that are in the middle range of population or household income and/or growth rates are considered Class B malls, and malls with lower average sales and smaller populations and lower household incomes and/or growth rates are considered Class C malls. Although these classifications are defined differently by different market participants, in general, most of our malls would be classified as Class A or Class B properties. The classification of a mall can change, and one of the goals of our current property strategic plans and remerchandising programs is to increase the average sales per square foot of certain of our properties and correspondingly increase their rental income and cash flows, and thus potentially their class, in order to maximize the value of the property. The malls that we have sold pursuant to the strategic property disposition program we commenced in 2012 generally have been Class C properties.

Our primary objective is to maximize the long-term value of the Company for our shareholders. To that end, our business goals are to obtain the highest possible rental income, tenant sales and occupancy at our properties in order to maximize our cash flows, net operating income, funds from operations, funds available for distribution to shareholders and other operating measures and results, and ultimately to maximize the values of our properties.

To achieve this primary goal, we have developed a business strategy focused on increasing the values of our properties, and ultimately of the Company, which includes:

Improving Our Balance Sheet by Reducing Debt and Leverage; Maintaining Liquidity

Leverage. We continue to seek ways to reduce our leverage by improving our operating performance and through a variety of other means available to us. These means might include selling properties or interests in properties with values in excess of their mortgage loans and applying any excess proceeds to debt reduction; entering into joint ventures or other partnerships or arrangements involving our contribution of assets; or through other actions.

Mortgage Loan Refinancings and Repayments. We might pursue opportunities to make favorable changes to individual mortgage loans on our properties. When we refinance such loans, we might seek a new term, better rates and excess proceeds. An aspect of our approach to debt financing is that we strive to lengthen and stagger the maturities of our debt obligations in order to better manage our future capital requirements. We might seek to repay certain mortgage loans in full in order to unencumber the associated properties, which enables us to increase our pool of unencumbered assets, have greater financial flexibility and obtain additional financing.

Liquidity. As of December 31, 2021, our consolidated balance sheet reflected $43.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe that this amount and future net cash provided by operations, together with the available credit under the First Lien Revolving Facility (as defined below and assuming continued compliance with the financial covenants thereunder) and other sources of capital, provide sufficient liquidity to meet our liquidity requirements in the short term, including for one year from the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Capital Recycling. We regularly conduct portfolio property reviews and, if appropriate, we seek to dispose of malls, other retail properties or outparcels that we do not believe meet the financial and strategic criteria we apply, given economic, market and other circumstances. Disposing of these properties can enable us to redeploy or recycle our capital to other uses, such as to repay debt, to reinvest in other real estate assets and development and redevelopment projects, and for other corporate purposes. Along these lines, in 2021 we completed the sale of three outparcels for total consideration of $14.6 million. Since we began our disposition program in 2012, we have sold 17 malls, four power centers, two street retail properties, three office properties and multiple land parcels and other real estate assets for a total of $924.3 million. The proceeds generated from these sales were reinvested in our existing redevelopment program or used to repay debt. In September 2019, we conveyed Wyoming Valley Mall to the lender of the mortgage loan secured by the property. In August 2020, we derecognized the assets of

Valley View Mall as a result of a court order assigning a receiver, however, we continue to recognize the mortgage until the property foreclosure sales process is complete. We are currently under contract to sell eight additional land outparcels and have executed an agreement of sale for a hotel site at one of our malls. We have a letter of intent for another hotel site while we are actively marketing one other site. We have executed an agreement of sale for residential sites at two of our malls and have also executed an agreement of sale for a vacant retail site at one of our malls that we expect to close in 2022.

We expect to continue to look for opportunities to sell non-core assets, including land parcels, to residential, hotel and office developers at some of our mall properties.

Raising the Overall Level of Quality of Our Portfolio and of Individual Properties in Our Portfolio

Portfolio Actions. We continue to refine our collection of properties to enhance the overall quality of the portfolio. We seek to have a portfolio that derives most of its Net Operating Income (“NOI”) (a non-GAAP measure; as defined below) from higher productivity properties and from properties located in major metropolitan markets. We hold ownership interests in 10 properties in the Philadelphia metro area, four properties in the Washington, D.C. metro area and one property in the Boston-Providence metro area. One method we have used and continue to use for raising the level of quality of our portfolio is disposing of assets that had certain economic features, such as sales productivity or occupancy levels below the average for our portfolio and significantly lower expected income due to anchor closures. We currently have one non-core mall (“Non-Core Malls”), Exton Square Mall, which we designated as a Non-Core Mall in 2018 because we have completed the first phase of a redevelopment with the opening of Whole Foods and the sale of a land parcel to a multifamily developer as part of our densification effort (as discussed below), and are continuing to consider the possible inclusion of other non-retail uses on the site. A second Non-Core Mall, Valley View Mall, was derecognized in the third quarter of 2020 as a result of a receiver being assigned to manage the property. A third Non-Core Mall, Wyoming Valley Mall, was conveyed to the lender of the mortgage loan secured by that property in 2019.

Redevelopment. We might also seek to improve particular properties, to increase the potential value of properties in our portfolio, and to maintain or enhance their competitive positions by redeveloping them. We do so in order to make the properties more attractive to customers and retailers, which we expect to lead to increases in shopper traffic, sales, occupancy and rental rates. Redevelopments are generally more involved than strategic property plans or remerchandising programs and require the investment of capital. We give redevelopment priority to properties in our portfolio that are of a higher quality and where we anticipate the redevelopment can be economically transformative. Our property redevelopments focus primarily on anchor replacement and remerchandising. We believe these activities will position us to optimize our financial returns.

Densification. We seek to maximize the value of our retail properties by adding other uses where appropriate. We believe that by incorporating residential, hotel or office uses into some of our retail properties, we will increase the value of those properties. The addition of other property types to our sites may provide synergies to both the retail and non-retail uses. The presence of residents, hotel guests or office workers in close proximity to the retail center may result in additional visits to the retail property. We have executed an agreement of sale for a hotel site at one of our malls that we expect to close in 2023. In 2020 and 2021, we entered into agreements of sale for parcels for anticipated multifamily development at eight sites on, or adjacent to, our mall properties. The closing of these transactions is subject to numerous closing conditions, including the completion of due diligence and securing of zoning variances and entitlements, which in several cases has been delayed due to, among other things, the effects of COVID-19 on business operations and availability of financing. Although we currently expect some of these transactions to close in 2022 and more to close in 2023, the closing of the transactions cannot be assured and the timing of the completion is subject to change.

Since 2014, we, along with our 50/50 joint venture partner, Macerich, have been engaged in a redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia (formerly The Gallery). In connection therewith, we contributed and sold real estate assets to the venture and Macerich acquired its interest in the venture and real estate from us for $106.8 million in cash. We and Macerich are jointly and severally responsible for a minimum investment in the project of $300.0 million. Fashion District Philadelphia is in a key location in central Philadelphia, strategically positioned above regional mass transit, adjacent to the convention center and tourism sites, and amidst numerous offices and residential sites. See below under ‘Financing Activity’ for a description of our loan secured by the Fashion District Philadelphia properties, which was amended in 2020. Since January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the operations of Fashion District Philadelphia.

An important aspect of any redevelopment project is its effect on the property and on the tenants and customers during the time that a redevelopment is taking place. While we might undertake a redevelopment to maximize the long term performance of the property, in the short term, the operations and performance of the property, as measured by sales, occupancy and NOI, will often be negatively affected. Tenants might be relocated or closed as space for the redevelopment is aggregated, which affects overall tenant sales and rental rates. As Fashion District Philadelphia was being redeveloped, occupancy, sales and NOI decreased from their levels prior to the commencement of the redevelopment. We expect those trends to reverse as the newly constructed space is completed, leased and occupied. On September 19, 2019, Fashion District Philadelphia, an aggregation of properties spanning three blocks in downtown Philadelphia that were formerly known as Gallery I, Gallery II and 907 Market Street, opened. Joining Century 21 (which subsequently closed in 2020) and Burlington in 2019 were multiple dining and entertainment venues including Market Eats, a multi-offering food court, City Winery, AMC Theatres, and Round 1 Bowling & Amusement. In addition, Nike Factory Store, Ulta, H & M, and Primark opened Philadelphia flagship stores at the property.

Mall-Specific Plans. We seek to unlock value in our portfolio through a variety of targeted efforts at our properties. We believe that certain of our properties, including those in trade areas around major cities or those which are leading properties in secondary markets, can benefit from strategic remerchandising strategies, including, for example, selective re-tenanting of certain spaces in certain properties with higher quality, better-matched tenants. Based on the demographics of the trade area or the relevant competition, we believe that this subset of properties provides opportunities for meaningful value creation at the property level. We believe that we can successfully implement particular strategies at these assets by incorporating in-demand uses such as dining, entertainment and fitness, by adding discount, specialty, fast fashion and native internet retailer tenants, and by closing, relocating and right-sizing certain existing mall tenants. Some examples of in-demand tenants include Apple, Urban Outfitters and The Cheesecake Factory. We also continuously work to optimize the match between the demographics of the trade area, such as the household income level, and the nature and mix of tenants at such properties. We strive to work closely with tenants to enhance their merchandising opportunities at our properties. We believe that these approaches can attract more national and other tenants to the property and can lead to higher occupancy and NOI.

Shopper Experiences. In addition to such property-wide remerchandising efforts, we also seek to offer unique shopper experiences at our properties by having tenants that provide products, services or interactions that are unlike other offerings in the trade area. We seek to add first-to-market tenants, dining and entertainment options, beauty and fashion purveyors, off-price retail, traditionally online retailers and health and fitness destinations such as Legoland Discovery Center, Peloton, Ulta, HomeSense, Dave & Buster's, Balsam Hill and the 1776 retail incubator, among others, as well as to provide amenities like children’s play areas and mall shopping smartphone apps.

Vacant Anchor Replacements. In recent years, through property dispositions, proactive store recaptures, lease terminations and other activities, we have made efforts to reduce our risks associated with certain department store concentrations.

During 2019, we re-opened or introduced additional tenants to former anchor positions at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Valley Mall in Hagerstown, Maryland and Plymouth Meeting Mall, in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. Dick’s Sporting Goods at Valley Mall opened in the first quarter of 2020. At Plymouth Meeting Mall, we opened Michaels in the first quarter of 2020 and Shake Shack and Ideal Image in 2021. In 2017, we purchased the Macy’s location at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and opened HomeSense, Sierra Trading, Five Below, and Michaels between 2018 and the first quarter of 2020. During 2021, we opened Power Warehouse at Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey.

Construction was completed in the first quarter of 2020 giving way to the opening of Burlington in place of a former Sears at Dartmouth Mall in Dartmouth, Massachusetts. Aldi also opened in the space adjacent to Burlington in September 2021. We expect to continue to move forward with several outparcels at Dartmouth Mall resulting from the Sears recapture and to work with large format prospects for the additional space adjacent to Burlington, but have experienced delays due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

During 2019, an anchor tenant, Sears, closed at Exton Square Mall in Exton, Pennsylvania. In January 2020, the Lord & Taylor store at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey closed and we have leased the space to Turn 7, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2021. Sears closed its stores at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and Jacksonville Mall in Jacksonville, North Carolina in April 2020. Sears continues to be financially obligated pursuant to the lease at Jacksonville Mall. In July 2021, the former Sears site at Moorestown Mall was sold to Cooper University Health Care. In May 2020, J.C. Penney filed for bankruptcy and announced the closure of its stores at the Mall at Prince Georges in Hyattsville, Maryland, and Magnolia Mall in Florence, South Carolina. The Magnolia Mall location has been leased to Tilt Studio, an entertainment concept that opened in October 2021.

In response to anchor store closings and other trends in the retail space, we have been changing the mix of tenants at our properties. We believe our distinctive real estate is at the forefront of enabling communities to flourish through the built environment by providing opportunities to create vibrant multi-use destinations. In general, our malls include carefully curated retail and lifestyle offerings, including national and regional department stores, large format retailers and other anchors, mixed with destination dining and entertainment experiences. In recent years, we have been reducing the percentage of traditional mall tenants and increasing the share of space dedicated to non-traditional mall tenants, including life sciences, healthcare, supermarkets, fulfillment centers and self storage facilities. See “— Capital Improvements, Redevelopment and Development Projects.”

To fund the capital necessary to replace anchors and to maintain a reasonable level of leverage, we expect to use a variety of means available to us, subject to and in accordance with the terms of our credit agreements. These steps might include (i) making additional borrowings under our credit agreements (assuming availability and continued compliance with the financial covenants thereunder), (ii) obtaining construction loans on specific projects, (iii) selling properties or interests in properties with values in excess of their mortgage loans (if applicable) and applying the excess proceeds to fund capital expenditures or for debt reduction, or (iv) obtaining capital from joint ventures or other partnerships or arrangements involving our contribution of assets with institutional investors, private equity investors or other REITs.

We aim to improve the overall operational performance of our portfolio of properties with a multi-pronged approach.

Occupancy. We continue to work to increase non-anchor and total occupancy in our properties, both of which have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and tenant bankruptcies. From 2020 to 2021, total occupancy for our retail portfolio including consolidated and unconsolidated properties (and including all tenants irrespective of the term of their agreement) increased 330 basis points to 90.4%, and total occupancy at our malls other than the Non-Core Malls (such other malls, the “Core Malls”) increased 290 basis points to 93.2%.

In connection with the remerchandising plans at several of our properties, we are seeking or have obtained tenants for new spaces of different types, such as pads or kiosks. We are also seeking tenants that have not previously been prevalent at our mall properties.

Key Tenants; Mall Leasing. We continue to recruit, and expand our relationships with, certain high profile retailers, and to initiate and expand our relationships with other quality and first-to-market retailers or concepts. We coordinate closely with tenants on new store locations in an effort to position our properties for our tenants’ latest concept or store prototype, in order to drive traffic to our malls and stimulate customer spending. We believe that increasing our occupancy in ways that are tailored to particular properties will be helpful to our leasing efforts and will help increase rental rates and tenant sales. We have also diversified the mix of tenants within our portfolio, with approximately 29% of our mall space committed to non traditional tenants offering services such as dining and entertainment, health and wellness, off price retail and fast fashion.

Rental Rates and Releasing Spreads. Although we have been taking steps to seek positive rent spreads as we renew leases and enter into new leases, during the challenging 2021 operating environment, total renewal spreads improved 3.3% on all non-anchor leases as compared to the renewal spreads on all non-anchor leases in 2020. As discussed above, since 2012, we have sold 17 low-productivity or underperforming malls. In 2020, we derecognized the assets of Valley View Mall as the property was assigned to a receiver. We continue to recognize the mortgage until the property is sold through the foreclosure process. We believe that the disposition of these less productive assets will help improve our negotiating position with retailers with multiple stores in our portfolio (including stores at these properties), and potentially enable us to obtain higher rental rates from them at our remaining properties.

Specialty Leasing and Partnership Marketing. Some space at our properties might be available for a shorter period of time, pending a lease with a permanent tenant or in connection with a redevelopment. We strive to manage the use of this space through our specialty leasing function, which manages the short term leasing of stores and the licensing of income-generating carts and kiosks, with the goal of maximizing the rent we receive during the period when a space is not subject to a longer term lease.

We also seek to generate ancillary revenue (such as sponsorship marketing revenue and promotional income) from the properties in our portfolio. We believe that increased efforts in this area can enable us to increase the proportion of net operating income derived from ancillary revenue.

Operating Expenses and CAM Reimbursements. Our strategy for improving operating results also includes efforts to control or reduce the costs of operating our properties. With respect to operating expenses, we have taken steps to manage a significant proportion of them through contracts with third party vendors for housekeeping and maintenance, security services, landscaping and trash removal. These contracts provide reasonable control, certainty and predictability. We also seek to contain certain expenses through our active programs for managing utility expense and real estate taxes. We have taken advantage of opportunities to buy electricity economically in states that have opened their energy markets to competition, and we expect to continue with this approach. We have instituted a solar energy program at five of our properties, which we expect will lower our utility expenses and reduce our carbon footprint. We also review the annual tax assessments of our properties and, when appropriate, pursue appeals.

With respect to CAM reimbursements, we have converted most of our leases to fixed CAM reimbursement, in contrast to the traditional pro-rata CAM reimbursement. Fixed CAM reimbursement, while shifting some risk to us as landlord, offers tenants increased predictability of their costs, a decrease in the number of items to be negotiated in a lease thus speeding lease execution, and reduced need for detailed CAM billings, reconciliations and collections.

We are taking steps designed to position the Company to generate future growth. In connection therewith, we have implemented processes designed to ensure strong internal discipline in the use, harvesting and recycling of our capital, and these processes will be applied in

connection with proposals to redevelop properties or to reposition properties with a mix of uses, or possibly, in the future, to acquire additional properties.

External Opportunities. Although it is not currently a primary focus, we may continue to seek to acquire, in an opportunistic, selective and disciplined manner, properties that are well-located, that are in trade areas with growing or stable demographics, that have operating metrics that are better than or equal to our existing portfolio averages, and that we believe have strong potential for increased cash flows and appreciation in value if we call upon our relationships with retailers and apply our skills in asset management and redevelopment. We also seek to acquire additional parcels or properties that are included within, or adjacent to, the properties already in our portfolio, in order to gain greater control over the merchandising and tenant mix of a property. Taking advantage of any acquisition opportunities would likely involve some use of debt or equity capital.

We pursue development of retail and mixed use projects that we expect can meet the financial and strategic criteria we apply, given economic, market and other circumstances. We seek to leverage our skill sets in site selection, entitlement and planning, design, cost estimation and project management to develop new retail and mixed use properties. We seek properties in trade areas that we believe have sufficient demand, once developed, to generate cash flows that meet the financial thresholds we establish in the given environment. We manage all aspects of these undertakings, including market and trade area research, acquisition, preliminary development work, construction and leasing.

Depending on the nature of the acquisition or development opportunity, we might involve a partner or sell land to a qualified third party, including in connection with projects involving a use other than retail.

In light of the redevelopment and densification opportunities in our existing portfolio, the capital required to complete these investments, and the limitations under our credit facilities, together with a limited availability of properties that meet our investment criteria, we are not currently emphasizing external opportunities as part of our growth strategy.

Organic Opportunities. We look for ways to maximize the value of our assets by adding a mix of uses, such as office or multi-family residential housing, initiated either by ourselves or with a partner, that are designed to attract a greater number of people to the property. Multiple constituencies, from local governments to city planners to citizen groups, have indicated a preference for in-place development, development near transportation hubs, the addition of uses to existing properties, and sustainable development, as opposed to locating, acquiring and developing new green field sites. Also, if appropriate, we will continue to seek to attract certain nontraditional tenants to these properties, including tenants using the space for purposes such as entertainment, education, health care, government and childcare, which can bring larger numbers of people to the property, as well as regional, local or nontraditional retailers. We are increasingly focused on bringing such nontraditional tenants to our properties, and we believe that such uses will increase traffic and enable us to generate additional revenue and grow the value of the property.

On October 7, 2020, we and certain of our wholly owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company Parties") entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the "RSA"), which contemplated agreed-upon terms for a financial restructuring of the then-existing debt and certain other obligations of the Company Parties (collectively with the following events, the "Financial Restructuring"). The RSA was amended on October 16, 2020, and again on October 23, 2020, to, among other things, extend the date by which the Company Parties were required to commence the solicitation of votes on their joint prepackaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the "Plan") and, thereafter, the voluntary chapter 11 cases. On November 1, 2020, we and the other Company Parties under the RSA (the "Debtors") filed our respective voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court"), commencing the chapter 11 cases to confirm and consummate the Plan in order to effectuate the Debtors' financial restructuring. The Debtors' chapter 11 cases were jointly administered for procedural convenience under the caption In re Pennsylvania Real 8 state Investment Trust, el al., Case No. 20-12737 (KBO). Under the Plan, the Debtors would be recapitalized and their debt maturities extended. The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. On November 30, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the "Confirmation Order"), confirming the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries (with Additional Technical Modifications As of November 20, 2020) (the "Confirmed Plan"). On December 10, 2020 (the "Effective Date"), each condition precedent to consummation of the Confirmed Plan, enumerated in Section 8.2 thereof, was satisfied or waived in accordance with the Confirmed Plan and the Continuation Order, and therefore the Effective Date occurred and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy. On the Effective Date, we entered into (a) an Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Agreement”) for secured loan facilities consisting of: (i) a secured first lien revolving credit facility allowing for borrowings up to $130.0 million, including a sub-facility for letters of credit to be issued thereunder in an aggregate stated amount of up to $10.0 million (collectively, the “First Lien Revolving Facility”), and (ii) a $384.5 million secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Loan Facility”), as well as (b) a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Agreement” and together with the First Lien Credit Agreement, the “Credit Agreements”) for a $535.2 million secured second lien term loan facility (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”). The Credit Agreements replaced our previously existing secured term loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020 (as amended, the “Bridge Credit Agreement”), our Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement entered into on January 8, 2014 (as amended, the “7-Year Term Loan”), and our 2018 Amended and Restated Credit

Agreement entered into on May 24, 2018 (together with the 7-Year Term Loan, the “Prepetition Unsecured Credit Agreements”). For a detailed description of the terms of our Credit Agreements, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreements” and Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.

The final decree closing the bankruptcy case was entered by the Bankruptcy Court on March 11, 2021.

Our net loss decreased by $130.8 million to a net loss of $135.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from a net loss of $266.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The change in our 2021 results of operations was primarily due to (a) an increase in lease revenue of $34.9 million; (b) a loss on remeasurement of Fashion District Philadelphia's assets and an other than temporary impairment on our investment in Fashion District Philadelphia totaling $148.5 million, which had an unfavorable impact in 2020; (c) a decrease of $8.4 million in depreciation and amortization; (d) an increase of $6.1 million in gain on debt extinguishment; and (e) a decrease of $3.5 million in reorganization expenses incurred due to our 2020 financial restructuring; partially offset by: (a) an increase in interest expense of $43.7 million driven by higher interest rates on our Credit Agreements and higher overall debt balances; (b) impairment of assets of $9.9 million in 2021; (c) an $8.1 million non-recurring gain on derecognition of property in 2020; and (d) a decrease of $11.3 million in non-recurring gain on sales of real estate.

Funds From Operations (“FFO”), a non-GAAP measure, increased 357.2% from the prior year, and FFO as adjusted, also a non-GAAP measure, decreased 193.3% from the prior year. Adjustments to FFO included a provision for employee separation, insurance recoveries, reorganization expenses, gain or loss on hedge ineffectiveness and a loss on debt extinguishment recognized in the fourth quarter 2020 as a result of our financial restructuring. FFO as adjusted per diluted share decreased 2% from 2020.

Same Store net operating income (“Same Store NOI”), a non-GAAP measure, increased 27.4% over the prior year. Same Store NOI, excluding lease termination revenue, increased 26.4% compared to 2020.

Renewal spreads at our properties decreased 6.2% on non-anchor leases under 10,000 square feet and increased 12.1% for non-anchor leases of at least 10,000 square feet.

Retail portfolio occupancy at December 31, 2021 was 90.4%, an increase of 330 basis points compared to 2020. Non-anchor occupancy was 87.7%, an increase of 80 basis points compared to 2020. Core Mall occupancy was 93.2%, an increase of 290 basis points compared to 2020. Core Mall non-anchor occupancy was 89.5%, an increase of 10 basis points compared to 2020.

Descriptions of each non-GAAP measure mentioned above, NOI, Same Store NOI, FFO, FFO, as adjusted, and FFO as adjusted per diluted share, as well as the related reconciliation to the comparable GAAP measures, are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—NON-GAAP SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES”.

As described above, in connection with our financial restructuring and emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases, we entered into two secured credit agreements: (a) the First Lien Credit Agreement, which includes (i) the First Lien Revolving Facility and (ii) the First Lien Term Loan Facility, and (b) the Second Lien Credit Agreement, which includes the Second Lien Term Loan Facility. The First Lien Term Loan Facility and the Second Lien Term Loan Facility are collectively referred to as the “Term Loans.” As described further above and in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements, the Credit Agreements refinanced the credit agreements that were outstanding prior to the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, and those credit agreements previously in effect were cancelled as of the Effective Date. As of December 31, 2020, aggregate borrowings under the Credit Agreements were as follows: (a) $54.8 million under the First Lien Revolving Facility, (b) $384.1 million under the First Lien Term Loan Facility, and (c) $538.0 million under the Second Lien Term Loan Facility. For a detailed description of the terms of our Credit Agreements, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreements” and Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.

PM Gallery LP, a Delaware limited partnership and joint venture entity owned indirectly by us and Macerich, previously entered into a $250.0 million term loan in January 2018 (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich, the “Partnership Loan”) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to the Macerich lender prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to us and Macerich. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. For a description of the terms of the FDP Loan Agreement, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreements—FDP Loan Agreement” and Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

Mortgage Loan Activity. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we executed forbearance and loan modification agreements for our consolidated properties Francis Scott Key Mall, Viewmont Mall, and Woodland Mall. These arrangements allowed us to defer principal payments, and in some cases interest as well. Certain of these forbearance and loan modification agreements also impose certain additional informational reporting requirements during the applicable modification periods.

In support of the business strategies described above, our long-term corporate finance objective is to maximize the availability and minimize the cost of the capital we employ to fund our operations. In pursuit of this objective and for other business reasons, we seek the broadest range of funding sources (including commercial banks, institutional lenders, equity and debt investors and joint venture partners) and funding vehicles (including mortgage loans, commercial loans, sales of properties or interests in properties, and debt and equity securities) available to us on the most favorable terms. We pursue this goal by maintaining relationships with various capital sources and utilizing a variety of financing instruments, all in an effort to enhance our flexibility to execute our business strategy in different economic environments or at different points in the business cycle.

We have two wholly-owned property mortgage loans maturing in 2022. While mortgage interest rates remain relatively low, we intend to continue to seek to extend the maturity dates of our mortgage loans to the maximum extent possible, or to replace them with longer term mortgage loans. In February 2021, we amended our Woodland Mall mortgage loan to provide for an extension option, which we exercised in December 2021, extending the maturity date to December 10, 2022.

As part of our capital strategy, in the past, we have taken steps to restructure our debt and credit facilities to align with our needs and goals at such time (including by implementing the Plan upon our emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases) and we intend to continue to evaluate our debt and credit facilities going forward. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreements” for a detailed description of the terms of our Credit Agreements.

In general, in determining the amount and type of debt capital to employ in our business, we consider several factors, including: general economic conditions, the capital market environment, prevailing and forecasted interest rates for various debt instruments, the cost of equity capital, property values, capitalization rates for mall properties, our financing needs for acquisition, redevelopment and development opportunities, the debt ratios of other mall REITs and publicly-traded real estate companies, and the federal tax law requirement that REITs distribute at least 90% of net taxable income, among other factors.

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on our interest-bearing liabilities. We attempt to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of various types of financial instruments. To manage interest rate risk and limit overall interest cost, we may employ interest rate swaps, options, forwards, caps and floors or a combination thereof depending on our underlying exposure, and subject to our ability to satisfy collateral requirements and the terms of our Credit Agreements.

To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required, under federal tax laws, to distribute to shareholders 90% of our net taxable income, which generally leaves insufficient funds to finance major initiatives internally. Because of these requirements, we ordinarily fund most of our significant capital requirements through secured and unsecured indebtedness, sales of properties or interests in properties and, when appropriate, the issuance of additional debt, equity or equity-related securities. As described above, the terms of our Credit Agreements and the existing cumulative unpaid dividends on our preferred shares create significant limitations on our ability to raise capital, including in the capital markets.

Aggregate borrowings under our $130.0 million First Lien Revolving Facility may be limited by the debt yield covenants included in our Credit Agreements. The maximum amount that was available to be borrowed by us under our First Lien Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2021 was $75.5 million. As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, $54.5 million was outstanding under the First Lien Revolving Facility.

In addition, our ability to finance our growth using these sources depends, in part, on our creditworthiness, the availability of credit to us, the market for our securities at the time or times we need capital and prevailing conditions in the capital and credit markets, among other things. We believe that we will have adequate access to capital to fund the remaining cost of our redevelopment program, which we currently estimate to be $4.3 million. Our continued ability to borrow under the Credit Agreements and any other indebtedness that we have or may obtain will be subject to compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreements or in the debt agreement governing such other indebtedness. These covenants impose restrictions that limit our ability to raise capital, including by requiring us to use cash proceeds from certain capital events to prepay our debt in certain circumstances. Furthermore, as a result of the existing cumulative unpaid dividends on our preferred shares and our bankruptcy filing, we are no longer able to register the offer and sale of securities on Form S-3. This creates additional limitations on our ability to raise capital in the capital markets, potentially increasing our costs of raising capital in the future. We have been focused on improving operational efficiency and driving stable and increasing cash flows from operations while advancing our portfolio, including by undertaking, with the assistance of outside advisors, a thorough review of our business and capital structure and evaluating a wide range of opportunities to further strengthen our balance sheet and financial flexibility.

We hold our interests in our portfolio of properties through our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. We are the sole general partner of PREIT Associates and, as of December 31, 2021, held a 98.7% controlling interest in PREIT Associates. We consolidate PREIT Associates for financial reporting purposes. We own our interests in our properties through various ownership structures, including partnerships and tenancy in common arrangements (collectively, “partnerships”). PREIT Associates’ direct or indirect economic interest in the properties ranges from 25% or 50% (for eight partnership properties) up to 100%. See “Item 2. Properties—Retail Properties.”

We provide management, leasing and real estate development services through two of our subsidiaries: PREIT Services, LLC (“PREIT Services”), which generally develops and manages properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes, and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”), which generally develops and manages properties that we do not consolidate for financial reporting purposes, including properties owned by partnerships in which we own an interest, and properties that are owned by third parties in which we do not have an interest. PREIT Services and PRI are consolidated. PRI is a taxable REIT subsidiary, as defined by federal tax laws, which means that it is able to offer additional services to tenants without jeopardizing our continuing qualification as a REIT under federal tax law.

The existence or development of competing retail properties and the related increased competition for tenants might, subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, lead us to make capital improvements to properties that we would have deferred or would not have otherwise planned to make and might affect occupancy and net operating income of such properties. Any such capital improvements, undertaken individually or collectively, would involve costs and expenses that could adversely affect our results of operations.

properties or development sites that we seek, or, if we pay a higher price for a property or site, or generate lower cash flow from an acquired property or site than we expect, our investment returns will be reduced, which will adversely affect the value of our securities.

We are aware of certain past environmental matters at some of our properties. We have, in the past, investigated and, where we consider appropriate, performed remediation of such environmental matters, but we might be required in the future to perform testing relating to these matters or to satisfy requirements for further remediation, or we might incur liability as a result of such environmental matters. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Properties—We might incur costs to comply with environmental laws, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.”

We strive to be socially and environmentally conscious. We have the capacity to produce more than 7.7 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year from solar arrays at five of our properties. The annual environmental benefit accrued through the production of renewable energy at these five properties is equivalent to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from more than 1,200 passenger vehicles. Over 85% of our centers' rooftops contain at least a portion of white roofs, which reflect sunlight and prevent heat caused roof damage and reduce summer energy usage. We have installed energy-efficient lighting at over half of our properties, which is expected to reduce our energy usage. We also currently offer 74 electric vehicle charging stations across our properties.

As of December 31, 2021, we had 158 employees at our properties and in our corporate office.

Our key human capital management objectives are to attract, retain and develop the highest quality talent to enhance our mission of enriching communities through the built environment. To support these objectives, our human resources programs are designed to: reward and support employees through competitive pay, benefits, and perquisite programs; enhance the Company’s culture through efforts aimed at making the workplace more engaging and inclusive; acquire and develop talent and facilitate internal talent mobility; and evolve and invest in technology, tools, and other resources for our employees.

We embrace diversity as valuable to a well-functioning company and provide equal opportunities without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender/gender identity, disability, status as a protected veteran, or any other characteristic protected by applicable federal, state and local laws. We also endeavor to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of any such status or characteristic. In 2020, we hosted a black-owned business showcase at Woodland Mall. In 2021, we launched an initiative to support and highlight black-owned businesses throughout our portfolio.

Our compensation program is designed to attract and retain talent. We continually assess and strive to enhance employee satisfaction and engagement, including by conducting an annual culture survey to engage employees and identify opportunities for improvement. Our employees, many of whom have a long tenure with the Company, frequently express satisfaction with management. Our employees are offered regular opportunities to participate in professional development programs, including tuition reimbursement, continuing education reimbursement, and leadership training. Our corporate headquarters office space is designed to create a better sense of place and pride and to cultivate a more collaborative work environment.

The health and safety of our employees is a high priority, in particular during the COVID-19 pandemic. In protecting our employees’ safety, we have invested in creating safe work environments for our employees by taking additional measures such as additional work from home flexibility, increased cleaning protocols, mask wearing in our corporate office and at our properties and enhanced communication and engagement regarding Company responses to the pandemic. We also offer various wellness initiatives for our employees.

Additionally, we are committed to sustainability and giving back to the communities in which we operate. In 2021, our properties supported several charitable organizations, hosting blood and food drives, among other community-facing initiatives. Our corporate giving program raised funds and awareness for various charitable and non-profit organizations.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic disruption, together with the preexisting economic challenges facing the retail industry, the Company implemented reductions-in-force and unpaid furloughs in 2020. In order to attempt to ease the effects of such actions, the Company extended health insurance to furloughed employees for certain periods and encouraged use of the Company’s existing wellness and mental health services through its employee assistance program. The Company has since brought furloughed employees back to full pay.

None of our employees are unionized or covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our current employee relations to be good.

We have comprehensive liability, fire, flood, cyber liability, terrorism, extended coverage and rental loss insurance that we believe is adequate and consistent with the level of coverage that is standard in our industry. We cannot be assured, however, that our insurance coverage will be adequate to protect against a loss of our invested capital or anticipated profits, or that we will be able to obtain adequate coverage at a reasonable cost in the future.

We conduct our operations in a manner intended to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Generally, as a REIT, we will not be subject to federal or state income taxes on our net taxable income that we currently distribute to our shareholders. Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend on our ability to meet various qualification tests (including dividend distribution, asset ownership and income tests) and certain share ownership requirements prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code.

Our principal executive offices are currently located at One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. In December 2018, we entered into a lease for this office space with Brandywine Realty Trust. A member of our Board of Trustees is also a trustee of Brandywine Realty Trust. The lease commenced in late December 2019 and our corporate office opened on January 2, 2020 at the One Commerce Square location.

There is seasonality in the retail real estate industry. Retail property leases often provide for the payment of all or a portion of rent based on a percentage of a tenant’s sales revenue, or sales revenue over certain levels. Income from such rent is recorded only after the minimum sales levels have been met. The sales levels are often met in the fourth quarter, during the November and December holiday season. Also, many new and temporary leases are entered into later in the year in anticipation of the holiday season and a higher number of tenants vacate their space early in the year. As a result, our occupancy and cash flows are generally higher in the fourth quarter and lower in the first and second quarters. Our concentration in the retail sector increases our exposure to seasonality and has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in a greater percentage of our cash flows being received in the fourth quarter.

We maintain a website with the address www.preit.com. We are not including or incorporating by reference the information contained on our website into this report. We make available on our website, free of charge and as soon as practicable after filing with the SEC, copies of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, all Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and all Current Reports on Form 8-K filed during each year, including all amendments to these reports, if any. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports are also available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of our corporate governance guidelines, codes of business conduct and ethics (which include the code of ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) and the governing charters for the audit, nominating and governance, and executive compensation and human resources committees of our Board of Trustees are available free of charge on our website, as well as in print to any shareholder upon request. We intend to comply with the requirements of Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to and waivers under the code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer by providing such information on our website within four days after effecting any amendment to, or granting any waiver under, that code, and we will maintain such information on our website for at least twelve months.

The COVID-19 global pandemic and the public health and governmental response have adversely affected, and will likely continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results. The extent and duration of such effects are uncertain, continuously changing and difficult to predict. Additionally, the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results.

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic that began in early 2020 has adversely impacted and continues to impact our operations, business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results, as well as our tenants’ businesses. The prolonged spread of COVID-19 has also led to unprecedented global economic disruption and volatility in financial markets. Some of our tenants’ financial health and business viability have been adversely impacted and their creditworthiness has deteriorated. We anticipate that our future business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including our results for 2022 and potentially future periods, may continue to be materially impacted by the ongoing implications of the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant uncertainty remains with regard to the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting impact on the economy and day-to-day life and business operations. In particular, the duration and impact of COVID-19 will depend on a variety of factors as conditions continue to fluctuate around the country, with vaccination rates, spikes in infections and restrictions on activities and recommended protocols continuing to vary and evolve. Given these factors, so long as the lingering effects of COVID-19 remain, the virus may continue to impact us or our tenants, or our ability or the ability of our tenants to resume more normal operations. Additionally, other future global health crises could result in significant effects on regional and global economies and on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

While we have taken several responsive steps, potential further actions may be necessary to adapt our business and address the impacts of the pandemic, including if and to the extent business operations normalize in a manner that is different from past experience. The spread of COVID-19 and measures taken to reduce its spread subject us to a variety of risks and could result in the following impacts, many of which have already occurred and could continue and increase the longer it continues:

The significance of COVID-19 on our business will continue to depend on, among other things, the extent and duration of the pandemic, the severity of the disease and the number of people infected with the virus, and certain variants thereof, vaccination rates in regions in which our properties are located, further effects on the economy of the pandemic and of the measures taken by governmental authorities and other third parties restricting daily activities and the length of time that such measures remain in place or are renewed, implementation of governmental

programs to assist businesses and consumers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effect of any changes to current restrictions or recommended protocols, all of which could vary by geographic region in which our properties are located. We continue to experience uncertainty as to whether government authorities will maintain the relaxation of current restrictions on businesses in the regions in which our properties are located, and whether government authorities will issue recommendations or impose requirements on landlords like us to further enhance health and safety protocols, or whether we will voluntarily adopt any of these requirements ourselves, which could result in increased operating costs and demands on our property management teams to ensure compliance with any of these requirements. While we have experienced and expect to continue to experience an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, we cannot estimate the extent to which COVID-19 will impact our future business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

We emerged from bankruptcy in 2020, which could adversely affect our business and relationships.

We emerged from bankruptcy at the end of 2020 and the final decree closing our bankruptcy case was entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in March 2021. This recent bankruptcy filing and emergence from chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings could adversely affect our business and relationships with tenants, employees and other constituents. Due to uncertainties, many risks exist, including the following:

The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material and adverse effect on our operations, financial condition and reputation.

Store closings, leasing and construction delays, lease terminations, tenant financial difficulties and tenant bankruptcies have in the past and could in the future adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We receive a substantial portion of our operating income as rent under leases with tenants. At any time, any tenant having space in one or more of our properties could experience a downturn in its business that might weaken its financial condition. There are also a number of tenants that are based outside the U.S., and these tenants are affected by economic conditions in the country where their headquarters are located and internationally. Any of such tenants might enter into or renew leases with relatively shorter terms. Such tenants might also defer or fail to make rental payments when due, delay or defer lease commencement, voluntarily vacate the premises or declare bankruptcy, which could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease, or preclude the collection of rent in connection with the space for a period of time, and could result in material losses to us and harm to our results of operations. Also, it might take time to terminate leases of underperforming or nonperforming tenants, and we might incur costs to remove such tenants. Some of our tenants occupy stores at multiple locations in our portfolio, therefore, as we have experienced in the past with tenants, the effect of any bankruptcy or store closing of those tenants might be more significant to us than the bankruptcy or store closings of other tenants. In addition, under some of our leases, our tenants pay rent based, in whole or in part, on a percentage of their sales. Accordingly, declines in these tenants’ sales, including due to factors such as tenants’ failure to innovate or change their business models at a pace sufficient to adapt to the evolving consumer landscape, could directly affect our results of operations, and in some cases allow these tenants to cancel their leases pursuant to a sales termination clause. Also, if tenants are unable to comply with the terms of our leases, or otherwise seek changes to the terms, including changes to the amount of rent, we might modify lease terms in ways that are less favorable to us.

If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the tenant might have the right to reject its leases, and we cannot be sure that it will assume its leases and continue to make rental payments in a timely manner. A bankruptcy filing by, or relating to, one of our tenants would bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant, or from their property, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. In addition, we cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. If a lease is assumed by the tenant in bankruptcy, all pre-bankruptcy balances due under the lease must be paid to us in full. However, if a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages in connection with such past-due balances in addition to the rejection damages, which amounts are likely to be less than the full amount owed to us for the rest of the lease term. If a bankrupt tenant vacates a space, it might not do so in a timely manner, and we might be unable to re-lease the vacated space during that time, at attractive rates, or at all. We may also need to incur significant expenses to re-let the space. In addition, such a scenario with one tenant could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants of the same property whose leases have co-tenancy provisions. These other tenants might seek changes to the terms of their

leases, including changes to the amount of rent to be paid. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt tenant might be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims, and there are restrictions under bankruptcy laws that limit the amount of the claim we can make if a lease is rejected. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, retailers that have sought protection from creditors under bankruptcy law have had difficulty in obtaining debtor-in-possession financing, which has decreased the likelihood that such retailers will emerge from bankruptcy protection and has limited their alternatives. In recent years, there has been an increased level of tenant bankruptcies and store closings by tenants that have been adversely affected by challenging economic conditions, which has been exacerbated by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations—Overview—Current Economic Conditions and Our Near Term Capital Needs” for information regarding tenants in bankruptcy. Tenant bankruptcies and liquidations have adversely affected, and are likely in the future to adversely affect, our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in the retail industry, particularly among anchor tenant retailers, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The income we generate depends in part on our anchor or other major tenants’ ability to attract customers to our properties and generate traffic, which affects the property’s ability to attract non-anchor tenants, and thus the revenue generated by the property. In recent years, in connection with economic conditions and other changes in the retail industry, including customers’ use of smartphones and websites, the continued expansion of e-commerce generally, and changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and measures taken to reduce its spread, some anchor tenant retailers have experienced decreases in operating performance, and in response, they are contemplating strategic, operational and other changes. The strategic and operational changes being considered by anchor tenants include subleasing, combinations and other consolidation designed to increase scale, leverage with suppliers like landlords, and other efficiencies, which might result in the restructuring of these companies and which could involve withdrawal from certain geographic areas, such as secondary or tertiary trade areas, or the closure or sale of stores operated by them.][1] Further, our tenants may fail to innovate or change their business models at a pace sufficient to adapt to the evolving consumer landscape, which could result in an increase in store closings, tenant bankruptcies or requests for rent relief, particularly among anchor tenants. We have been affected by anchor store closings in the past and cannot assure you that there will not be additional store closings by any anchor or other tenant in the future, which could affect our results of operations and cash flows. Although we have adapted and continue to evolve our business to reduce reliance on traditional anchor department stores, closure of one or more anchor stores would have a negative effect on the affected properties, on our portfolio and on our results of operations. In addition, a lease termination by an anchor for any reason, a failure by an anchor to occupy the premises, or any other cessation of operations by an anchor could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants of the same property whose leases permit cancellation or rent reduction (i.e., co-tenancy provisions) if an anchor’s lease is terminated or the anchor otherwise ceases occupancy or operations. In that event, we might be unable to re-lease the vacated space of the anchor or non-anchor stores in a timely manner, or at all. If a large number of anchor stores close in a particular region, competition to fill these vacancies could cause us to lease space at lower rates than we would otherwise seek, which could negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, the leases of some anchors might permit the anchor to transfer its lease, including any attendant approval rights, to another retailer. The transfer to a new anchor could cause customer traffic in the property to decrease or to be composed of different types of customers, which could reduce the income generated by that property. A transfer of a lease to a new anchor also could allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases at the property, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Approximately 40% of our non-anchor leases expire in 2022 or 2023 or are in holdover status, and if we are unable to renew these leases or re-lease the space covered by these leases on equivalent terms, we might experience reduced occupancy and traffic at our properties and lower rental revenue, net operating income and cash flows.

The current conditions in the economy, including changes in the means and patterns of consumer behavior generally and particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, may affect employment growth and cause fluctuations and variations in retail sales, consumer confidence and consumer spending on retail goods. The weaker operating performance of certain retailers, combined in some circumstances with overleveraged retailer balance sheets in recent years has resulted in bankruptcies, store closings, consolidations of operations, and in delays or deferred decisions regarding the openings of new retail stores at some of our properties and affected renewals of both anchor and non-anchor leases. In recent years, partially because of the economic environment, we frequently renewed leases with terms of one year, two years or three years, rather than the more typical five years or ten years. These shorter term leases enabled both the tenant and us, before entering into a longer term lease, to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a longer term lease at a later time in the economic cycle, at least in part with the expectation that there will be greater visibility into future conditions in the economy and future trends. As a result, we have a substantial number of such leases that are in holdover status or will expire in the next few years, including some leases with our top 20 tenants, and including both anchor and non-anchor leases. See “Item 2. Properties—Retail Lease Expiration Schedule” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Leasing Activity.” We might not be successful in renewing the leases for, or re-leasing, the space covered by leases that are in holdover status or that are expiring in 2022 or 2023, or obtaining positive rent renewal spreads, or even renewing the leases on terms comparable to those of the expiring leases. If we are not successful, we will be likely to experience reduced occupancy, traffic, rental revenue and net operating income, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely and accurate manner, and our stock price.

As further described in Part II, Item 9A of this report, in the course of completing our assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Form 10-K”), our management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. These deficiencies related to (i) identifying and assessing risks of misstatement to ensure management review controls are designed, implemented, and operating at a level to effectively respond to those risks, (ii) monitoring the consistent operation of internal control over financial reporting and remediation of known control deficiencies, and (iii) evaluating the reliability of information used in management review controls.

Management developed and implemented its remediation plan during 2021, however, as further described in Part II, Item 9A of this report, the Company has not yet fully remediated its material weakness identified as of December 31, 2020, as the remediated steps were not in place for the full year 2021. Until our remediation plan is implemented for a full year and operating effectively, management will continue to devote time and attention to these efforts. Management has concluded that, because of the material weaknesses, our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021. If our remediation plan is ineffective, there will be an increased risk that we will be unable to timely file future periodic reports with the SEC and that our future consolidated financial statements could contain errors that will be undetected. If we are unable to report our results in a timely and accurate manner, we may not be able to comply with the applicable covenants in our financing arrangements and may be required to seek amendments or waivers under these financing arrangements, which, if not agreed to, could adversely impact our liquidity and financial condition. Among other adverse consequences, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could lead to a decline in our stock price. In addition, we could be subjected to regulatory scrutiny, investigations by the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation, the defense of any of which could cause the diversion of management’s attention and resources. We could incur significant legal and other expenses, and we could be required to pay damages to settle such actions if any such actions were not resolved in our favor. There can be no assurance that we will not conclude in the future that the material weaknesses continue to exist or that we will not identify any significant deficiencies or other material weaknesses that will impair our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations accurately or on a timely basis.

The investments we have made in redeveloping older properties and developing new properties could be subject to delays or other risks and might not yield the returns we anticipate, which would harm our financial condition and operating results.

To the extent we continue current redevelopment projects or enter into new redevelopment or development projects in the longer term, they will be subject to a number of risks that could negatively affect our return on investment, financial condition and results of operations, including, among others:

Further, any required zoning, occupancy or other government approvals or, to the extent required, other third-party approvals, may delay the sale by us of our properties or interests in our properties. Some of our retail properties were constructed or last renovated more than 10 years ago. Older, unrenovated properties tend to generate lower rent and might require significant expense for maintenance or renovations to maintain competitiveness, which, if incurred, could harm our results of operations. Subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, as a key component of our growth strategy, we plan to continue to redevelop existing properties, and we might develop or

redevelop other projects as opportunities arise. These plans are subject to then-prevailing economic, capital market and retail industry conditions.

We might elect not to proceed with certain development projects after they have begun. In general, when we elect not to proceed with a project that has commenced, development costs for such a project will be expensed in the then-current period. The accelerated recognition of these expenses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which the expenses are recognized.

We might be unable to effectively manage any redevelopment and development projects involving a mix of uses, or other unique aspects, such as a project located in a city rather than a suburb, which could affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The complex nature of redevelopment and development projects calls for substantial management time, attention and skill. Some of our redevelopment and development projects currently, and in the future, are likely to involve mixed uses of the properties, including residential, office and other uses. We might not have all of the necessary or desirable skill sets to manage such projects. When a development or redevelopment project includes a non-retail use, we generally seek to sell the rights to that component to a third-party developer with experience in that use, or we seek to partner with such a developer. If we are not able to sell the rights to, or partner with, such a developer, or if we choose to develop the other component ourselves, we would be exposed not only to those risks typically associated with the development of commercial real estate generally, and of retail real estate, but also to specific risks associated with the development, ownership and property management of non-retail real estate, such as the demand for residential or office space of the types to be developed and the effects of general economic conditions on such property types, as opposed to the effects on retail real estate, with which we are more familiar. Also, if we pursue a redevelopment or development project with a different or unique aspect, such as a project in a dense city location like the redevelopment of [the Fashion District Philadelphia (“FDP”)], either in a partnership with another developer (like with Macerich for FDP) or ourselves, we would be, and are, exposed to the particular risks associated with the unique aspect such as, in the case of dense city projects, differences in the entitlements process, different types of responses by particular stakeholders and different involvement and priorities of local, state and federal government entities. In addition, even if we sell the rights to develop a specific component or elect to participate in the development through a partnership, we might be exposed to the risks associated with the failure of the other party to complete the development as expected. These include the risk that the other party would default on its obligations, necessitating that we complete the component ourselves (including providing any necessary financing). Additionally, in connection with our restructuring in 2020, Macerich now substantially controls the FDP joint venture’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. The lack of sufficient management resources, or of the necessary skill sets to execute our plans, or the failure of a partner in connection with a joint, mixed-use or other unique development such as FDP, could delay or prevent us from realizing our expectations with respect to any such projects and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Expense reimbursements are relatively low and might continue to be relatively low. Also, operating expenses may increase in the future, reducing our cash flows.

Our leases have historically provided that the tenant is liable for a portion of common area maintenance (“CAM”) costs, real estate taxes and other operating expenses. If these expenses increase, then under such provisions, the tenant’s portion of such expenses also increases. Our new leases are continuing to incorporate terms providing for fixed CAM reimbursement or caps on the rate of annual increases in CAM reimbursement. In these cases, a tenant will pay a set or capped expense reimbursement amount, regardless of the actual amount of operating expenses. The tenant’s payment remains the same even if operating expenses increase, causing us to be responsible for the excess amount. To the extent that existing leases, new leases or renewals of leases do not require a pro rata contribution from tenants, and to the extent that any new fixed CAM reimbursement provision sets an amount below actual expense levels, we are liable for the cost of such expenses in excess of the portion paid by tenants, if any. This has affected and could, in the future, adversely affect our net effective rent and our results of operations. Further, if a property is not fully occupied, as it typically is not, we are required to pay the portion of the expenses allocable to the vacant space that is otherwise typically paid by tenants, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Our properties are also subject to the risk of increases in CAM costs and other operating expenses, which typically include real estate taxes, energy and other utility costs, repairs, maintenance on and capital improvements to common areas, security, housekeeping, property and liability insurance and administrative costs. A significant portion of our operating expenses are managed through contracts with third-party vendors. Vendor consolidation could result in increased expense for such services. In addition, in recent years, municipalities have sought to raise real estate taxes paid by our property in their jurisdiction because of their strained budgets, our recent redevelopment of such property or for other reasons. In some cases, our mall might be the largest single taxpayer in a jurisdiction, which could make real estate tax increases significant to us. If operating expenses increase, the availability of other comparable retail space in the specific geographic markets where our properties are located might limit our ability to pass these increases through to tenants, or, if we do pass all or a part of these increases on, might lead tenants to seek retail space elsewhere, which, in either case, could adversely affect our results of operations.

The valuation and accounting treatment of certain long-lived assets, such as real estate, or of intangible assets, such as goodwill, could result in future asset impairments, which would be recorded as operating losses.

Real estate investments and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as a decrease in net operating income, the loss of an anchor tenant or an agreement of sale at a price below book value, indicate that the carrying amount of the property might not be recoverable. An operating property to be held and used is considered impaired under applicable accounting authority only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest

charges, is less than the carrying value of the property. In addition, this estimate may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or when a range of possible values is estimated. This estimate takes into consideration factors such as expected future net operating income, trends and prospects, and upcoming lease maturities, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. We have set our estimates of future cash flows to be generated by our properties taking into account these factors, which might cause changes in our estimates in the future. If we find that the carrying value of real estate investments and related intangible assets has been impaired, as we did in recent years, we will recognize impairment with respect to such assets. Applicable accounting principles require that goodwill and certain intangible assets be tested for impairment annually or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances. If we find that the carrying value of goodwill or certain intangible assets exceeds estimated fair value, we will reduce the carrying value of the real estate investment or goodwill or intangible asset to the estimated fair value, and we will recognize impairment with respect to such investments or goodwill or intangible assets.

Impairment of long-lived assets is required to be recorded as a non-cash operating expense. In 2021, we recorded approximately $9.9 million in non-cash impairment charges. We did not record any noncash impairment charges on our long-lived assets in 2020. Any decline in the estimated fair values of our assets could result in impairment charges in the future. It is possible that such impairments, if required, could be material. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Asset Impairment.”

Conditions in the U.S. economy might adversely affect our cash flows from operations.

The U.S. economy has continued to experience fluctuating income growth distributed unevenly among the population, and is experiencing increased health care costs and inflation. Particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. economy experienced a downturn in economic activity in 2020 and significant supply chain and labor market disruptions into 2021 and early 2022. Changes in the patterns of consumer spending, consumer confidence and seasonal spending have led to decreased operating performance of and bankruptcy or similar filings by several retailer tenants, which has led to store closings, delays or deferred decisions regarding lease renewals and the openings of new retail stores at our properties, and has in some cases affected the ability of our current tenants to meet their obligations to us. This has affected our ability to generate cash flows, meet our debt service requirements, comply with the covenants under our Credit Agreements, make capital expenditures and make distributions to shareholders, and we expect these impacts to continue. These conditions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Periods of economic disruption can result in volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets, and the resulting economic environment may be affected by increases in foreclosures and costs of living, all of which is likely to impact consumer spending. These circumstances could result in decreased revenues for our tenants and related decreases in the value of our properties. A sustained downward economic trend could impact our tenants’ ability to meet their lease obligations due to poor operating results, lack of liquidity or other reasons. Our ability to lease space may be impacted in this type of economic environment as could access to capital and credit markets, which may make it difficult to refinance our debt at maturity. Any of these events could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our retail properties are concentrated in the Eastern United States, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region, and adverse market conditions in that region might affect the ability of our tenants to make lease payments and the interest of prospective tenants to enter into leases, which might reduce the amount of revenue generated by our properties.

Our retail properties are concentrated in the Eastern United States, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region, including a number of properties in the Philadelphia, and to a lesser extent, the Washington, D.C. metropolitan areas. To the extent adverse conditions affecting retail properties, such as economic conditions, population trends, changing demographics and urbanization, availability and costs of financing, construction costs, income, unemployment, declining real estate values, local real estate conditions, sales and property taxes and tax laws, and weather conditions are particularly adverse in these areas, our results of operations will be affected to a greater degree than companies that do not have concentrations in these regions. If the sales of stores operating at our properties were to decline significantly due to adverse regional conditions, the risk that our tenants, including anchors, will be unable to fulfill the terms of their leases to pay rent or will enter into bankruptcy might increase. Furthermore, such adverse regional conditions might affect the likelihood or timing of lease commitments by new tenants or lease renewals by existing tenants as such parties delay their leasing decisions in order to obtain the most current information about trends in their businesses or industries. If, as a result of prolonged adverse regional conditions, occupancy at our properties decreases or our properties do not generate sufficient revenue to meet our operating and other expenses, including debt service, our financial position, results of operations and cash flow would be adversely affected beyond the impairment charge already taken.

The benefits of our redevelopment of The Gallery at Market East into Fashion District Philadelphia may not be realized as expected and our financial results could be adversely affected.

We, along with our joint venture partner, The Macerich Company, undertook the significant redevelopment of FDP. FDP opened in 2019, but full occupancy has not yet been achieved, and stabilization is currently anticipated to be realized in 2022. Although FDP is expected to generate

a positive contribution and provide for future growth, operating FDP involves a number of risks, including those that are financial and operational in nature. For example, FDP may under-perform relative to our expectations or not perform in accordance with our anticipated timetable or it may place unanticipated demands on our resources, and in 2020, we recorded a non-cash impairment to our investment in FDP of $148.5 million. Additionally, in connection with our restructuring in 2020, Macerich now substantially controls the joint venture’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. If we are unable to realize the expected benefits of our investment in this joint venture, our financial results could be adversely affected.

We have invested and may in the future invest in partnerships with third parties to acquire, develop or redevelop properties, and we might not control the management, redevelopment or disposition of these properties, or we might be exposed to other risks.

We have invested and may in the future invest as a partner with third parties in the acquisition or ownership of existing properties or the development of new properties, in contrast to acquiring or owning properties or developing projects by ourselves. Entering into partnerships with third parties involves risks not present where we act alone, in that we might not have primary control over the acquisition, disposition, development, redevelopment, financing, leasing, management, budgeting and other aspects of the property or project. These limitations might adversely affect our ability to develop, redevelop or sell these properties at the most advantageous time for us, if at all. Also, there might be restrictive provisions and rights that apply to sales or transfers of interests in our partnership properties, which might require us to make decisions about buying or selling interests at a disadvantageous time.

Some of our retail properties are owned by partnerships for which major decisions, such as a sale, lease, refinancing, redevelopment, expansion or rehabilitation of a property, or a change of property manager, require the consent of all partners. Accordingly, because decisions must be unanimous, necessary actions might be delayed significantly and it might be difficult or even impossible to remove a partner that is serving as the property manager. We might not be able to resolve favorably any conflicts which arise with respect to such decisions, or we might be required to provide financial or other inducements to our partners to obtain a resolution. In cases where we are not the controlling partner or where we are only one of the general partners, there are many decisions that do not relate to fundamental matters that do not require our approval and that we do not control. Also, in cases in which we serve as managing general partner of the partnership that owns the property, we might have certain fiduciary responsibilities to the other partners in those partnerships.

Business disagreements with our third-party partners might arise. We might incur substantial expenses in resolving these disputes. Moreover, we cannot assure you that our resolution of a dispute with a third-party partner will be on terms that are favorable to us.

The profitability of each partnership we enter into with a third party that has short-term financing or debt requiring a balloon payment is dependent on the subsequent availability of long-term financing on satisfactory terms. If satisfactory long-term financing is not available, we might have to rely on other sources of short-term financing or equity contributions. Although these partnerships are not wholly-owned by us, if any obligations were recourse, we might be required to pay the full amount of any obligation of the partnership, or we might elect to pay all of the obligations of such a partnership to protect our equity interest in its properties and assets. This could cause us to utilize a substantial portion of our liquidity sources or operating funds and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Our business could be harmed if members of our corporate management team terminate their employment with us or otherwise are unable to continue in their current capacity or we are unable to attract and retain talented employees.

Our future success depends, to a meaningful extent, upon the continued services of Joseph F. Coradino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mario C. Ventresca, Jr., our Chief Financial Officer, and the services of our corporate management team and, more broadly, our employees generally. Our executives have substantial experience in managing, developing and acquiring retail real estate. During 2021, in an effort to incentivize and retain our personnel, we extended retention bonuses to certain employees payable in installments in April and December 2022. We also entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Joseph F. Coradino, our Chief Executive Officer, and an amendment to employment agreement with Mario C. Ventresca, Jr., our Chief Financial Officer. Each of these executives could elect to

terminate their respective agreements at any time. The loss of services of one or more members of our corporate management team, or our failure to attract and retain talented employees generally could harm our business and our prospects. Further, if we undertake certain cost-savings and restructuring initiatives in the future, they may be disruptive to our workforce and operations and adversely affect our financial results, because they may impact employee morale and may impair our ability to attract and retain talent.

If we suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of our insurance coverage limits, we could lose invested capital and anticipated profits.

There are some types of losses, including those of a catastrophic nature, such as losses due to wars, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, environmental matters, information technology system failures (including phishing, ransomware and cyber attacks) and lease and contract claims, that are generally uninsurable or not economically insurable, or might be subject to insurance coverage limitations, including large deductibles or co-payments or caps on coverage amounts. Under federal terrorism risk insurance legislation, the United States government provides reinsurance coverage to insurance companies following a declared terrorism event. There is a generally similar program relating to flood insurance. If either or both of these programs were no longer in effect, it might become prohibitively expensive, or impossible, to obtain insurance that covers damages or losses from those types of events. Tenants might also encounter difficulty obtaining coverage.

If one of these events occurred to, or caused the destruction of, one or more of our properties, we could lose both our invested capital and anticipated profits from that property. We also might remain obligated for any mortgage loan or other financial obligation related to the property. In addition, if we are unable to obtain insurance in the future at acceptable levels and at a reasonable cost, the possibility of losses in excess of our insurance coverage might increase and we might not be able to comply with covenants under our debt agreements, which could adversely affect our financial condition. If any of our properties were to experience a significant, uninsured loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay our receipt of revenue and result in large expense to repair or rebuild the property. These types of events could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Inflation has become a growing concern. The 2021 annual rate of inflation in the U.S. is higher than at any point in recent years. Inflationary price increases could have an adverse effect on consumer spending, which could impact our tenants’ sales and, in turn, our tenants’ business operations. This could affect the amount of rent these tenants pay, including if their leases provide for percentage rent or percentage of sales rent, and their ability to pay rent. Also, inflation could cause increases in operating expenses, which could increase occupancy costs for tenants and, to the extent that we are unable to recover operating expenses from tenants, could increase operating expenses for us. In addition, if the rate of inflation exceeds the scheduled rent increases included in our leases, then our net operating income and our profitability would decrease. Inflation could also result in increases in market interest rates, which could not only negatively impact consumer spending and tenant investment decisions, but would also increase the borrowing costs associated with our existing or any future variable rate debt, to the extent such rates are not effectively hedged or fixed, or any future debt that we incur.

We face risks associated with, and have experienced, security breaches through cyber attacks. A significant privacy breach or IT system disruption could adversely affect our business and we might be required to increase our spending on data and system security, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities. In addition, our business relationships with our tenants and vendors involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. Like many businesses today, we have experienced an increase in cyber-threats and attempted intrusions. Our systems are subject to a variety of forms of cyber attacks (including phishing and ransomware attacks) with the objective of gaining unauthorized access to our systems or data or disrupting our operations. Security breaches have, from time to time, occurred and may occur in the future. Due to the nature of these attacks, there is a risk that an attack or intrusion remains undetected for a period of time. Although the cyber attacks we have experienced have not had a material impact on our financial results to date, and we maintain cyber liability insurance coverage, there remains a risk that breaches in security could expose us, our tenants or our employees to a risk of loss, misappropriation of assets that cannot be recovered, or misuse of proprietary information and of sensitive or confidential data. In addition, our information technology systems, some of which are managed or hosted by third-parties, may be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to computer viruses, attacks by computer hackers, telecommunication failures, user errors or catastrophic events, failures during the process of upgrading or replacing software, databases or components thereof, power outages or hardware failures. Any of these occurrences could result in disruptions in our operations, the loss of existing or potential tenants or shoppers, damage to our brand and reputation, regulatory compliance efforts and costs, remediation costs, and litigation and potential liability. Even the most well-protected information remains potentially vulnerable, because the techniques and sophistication used to conduct cyber attacks and breaches of IT systems, as well as the sources of these attacks, change frequently and are often not recognized until they are launched and have been put in place for a period of time. Although we make substantial efforts to maintain the security of our networks and related systems, there can be no assurance that our security efforts will be effective or that attempted security breaches would not be successful or damaging. Our efforts include conducting periodic assessments of internal and external threats to and vulnerabilities of our information and technology systems, security controls and processes in place and the effectiveness of our management of cybersecurity risk. The results of these

assessments are used to create and implement strategies designed to prevent, detect and respond to cybersecurity threats, and we expect to continue to employ cybersecurity risk mitigation measures, as well as seek to improve and expand such measures. We expect to continue to dedicate resources to technology and mitigating related risks. We may incur increasing costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, to train employees and engage third-party experts and consultants, or to notify employees, suppliers or the general public as part of our notification obligations. The cost and operational consequences of implementing further data or system protection measures or remediation efforts could be significant. Our processes, procedures and controls to reduce these risks, our increased awareness of the risk of a cyber incident, and our insurance coverage, however, do not guarantee that our financial results would not be materially impacted by a cyber incident.

Our retailer tenants’ businesses also require the collection, transmission and retention of large volumes of shopper and employee data, including credit and debit card numbers and other personally identifiable information, in various information technology systems. The consequences of cyber attacks perpetrated against our retailer tenants, which may include the misappropriation of assets or sensitive information or an operational disruption, could diminish consumer confidence and spending, result in fines, legal claims or proceedings or other liability, as well as significant remediation costs, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on their financial condition and results of operations and business. This could, in turn, have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We might incur costs to comply with environmental laws, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations and case law, an owner, former owner or operator of real estate might be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances present at, on, under, in or released from its property, regardless of whether the owner, operator or other responsible party knew of or was at fault for the release or presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The responsible party also might be liable to the government or to third parties for substantial property damage and investigation and cleanup costs. Even if more than one person might have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws might be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination. Contamination might adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate or borrow with that real estate as collateral. In connection with our ownership, operation, management, development and redevelopment of properties, or any other properties we acquire in the future, we might be liable under these laws and might incur costs in responding to these liabilities.

We are aware of certain environmental matters at some of our properties. We have, in the past, investigated and, where appropriate, performed remediation of such environmental matters, but we might be required in the future to perform testing relating to these matters and further remediation might be required, or we might incur liability as a result of such environmental matters. Environmental matters at our properties include the following:

Asbestos. Asbestos-containing materials are present at a number of our properties, primarily in the form of floor tiles, mastics, roofing materials and adhesives. Fire-proofing material containing asbestos is present at some of our properties in limited concentrations or in limited areas. Under applicable laws and practices, asbestos-containing material in good, non-friable condition are allowed to be present, although removal might be required in certain circumstances. In particular, in the course of any redevelopment, renovation, construction or build out of tenant space, asbestos-containing materials are generally removed.

Underground and Above Ground Storage Tanks. Underground and above ground storage tanks are or were present at some of our properties. These tanks were used to store waste oils or other petroleum products primarily related to the operation of automobile service center establishments at those properties. In some cases, the underground storage tanks have been abandoned in place, filled in with inert materials or removed and replaced with above ground tanks. Some of these tanks might have leaked into the soil, leading to ground water and soil contamination. Where leakage has occurred, we might incur investigation, remediation and monitoring costs if responsible current or former tenants, or other responsible parties, are unavailable to pay such costs.

Ground Water and Soil Contamination. Ground water contamination has been found at some properties in which we currently or formerly had an interest. At some properties, dry cleaning operations, which might have used solvents, contributed to ground water and soil contamination.

Each of our retail properties has been subjected to a Phase I or similar environmental audit (which involves a visual property inspection and a review of records, but not soil sampling or ground water analysis) by environmental consultants. These audits have not revealed, and we are not aware of, any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. It is possible, however, that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware. Also, we cannot assure you that future laws will not impose any material environmental liability, or that the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by the operations of our tenants, by the existing condition of the land, by operations in the vicinity of the properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks) or by the activities of unrelated third parties.

We have environmental liability insurance coverage for the types of environmental liabilities described above, which currently covers liability for pollution and on-site remediation of up to $10.0 million per occurrence and $10.0 million in the aggregate over our two-year policy term.

We cannot assure you that this coverage will be adequate to cover future environmental liabilities. If this environmental coverage were inadequate, we would be obligated to fund those liabilities. We might be unable to continue to obtain insurance for environmental matters, at a reasonable cost or at all, in the future.

In addition to the costs of remediation, we might incur additional costs to comply with federal, state and local laws relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. There are also various federal, state and local fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations that might be applicable to our operations and that might subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. The cost described above, individually or in the aggregate, could adversely affect our results of operations.

There is increasing evidence of global warming and, more generally, climate change as extreme weather events and associated damage is being experienced with increasing frequency and severity. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, our properties in certain markets and regions could be impacted by increases in storm intensity and rising sea levels, any of which may cause damage and result in costly repairs or renovations to adapt our properties, and/or require extended closures of our properties. Over time, these conditions could result in volatile or decreased demand for retail space at certain of our properties or, in extreme cases, our inability to operate the properties at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) insurance on favorable terms and increasing the cost of energy and snow removal at our properties. Moreover, compliance with new laws or regulations related to climate change, including compliance with “green” building codes, may require us to make improvements to our existing properties or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. At this time, there can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on us.

We might not be successful in identifying suitable acquisitions, completing acquisitions, or integrating any properties we acquire, which might adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Acquisitions of retail properties were historically an important component of our growth strategy, although we have not completed any acquisitions in recent years and do not currently anticipate acquisition activity in the near term. Expanding by acquisitions requires us to identify suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet the criteria we apply, given economic, market or other circumstances, and that are compatible with our growth strategy. Our credit facilities substantially limit our right to pursue acquisitions, subject to certain exceptions. We might not be successful in identifying suitable properties or other assets in our existing geographic markets or in markets new to us that meet the acquisition criteria we apply, given economic, market or other circumstances, in financing such properties or other assets or in consummating acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms or we may not be able to compete effectively. Further, time constraints or other limitations in the scope of our diligence review might lead us to make acquisitions that might have additional or larger issues than we anticipated, which might reduce the returns on our investment and affect our financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent that we pursue and complete acquisitions of additional properties or portfolios of properties that meet the investment criteria we apply, given economic, market and other circumstances, we might not be able to adapt our management and operational systems to effectively manage any such acquired properties or portfolios, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Online shopping and other uses of technology could affect the business models and viability of retailers, which could, in turn, affect their demand for retail real estate.

Online retailing and shopping and the use of technology to aid purchase decisions have increased in recent years, and particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the shift to online shopping has been accelerated and significant. These changes to retail models are expected to continue to remain popular in the future. In certain categories, such as books, music, apparel and electronics, online retailing has become a significant proportion of total sales, and has affected retailers and consumers significantly. The information available online empowers consumers with knowledge about products and information about prices and other offers differently than information available in a single physical store with sales associates. Consumers are able to purchase products anytime and anywhere and are able to compare more products than are typically found in a single retail location, and they are able to read product reviews and to compare product features and pricing. In addition, customers of certain of our retailers use technology including smartphones to check competitors’ product offerings and prices while in stores evaluating merchandise. Some tenants utilize our shopping centers as showrooms or as part of an omni-channel strategy (allowing for customers to shop online or in stores and for order fulfillment and returns to take place in stores or via shipping). In this model, customers may make purchases during or immediately after visiting our malls, with such sales not currently being captured in our tenant sales figures or monetized in our minimum or percentage rents.

Online shopping and technology, such as smartphone applications, are affecting and might continue to affect the business models, sales and profitability of retailers, which would, in turn, affect the demand for retail real estate, occupancy at our properties and the amount of rent that we receive. Any resulting decreases in rental revenue could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to risks that affect the retail real estate environment generally.

Our business focuses on retail real estate, predominantly malls. As such, we are subject to certain risks that can affect the ability of our retail properties to generate sufficient revenue to meet our operating and other expenses, including debt service, to make capital expenditures and to make future distributions to our shareholders. We face continuing challenges because of changing consumer preferences and because the conditions in the economy affect employment growth and cause fluctuations and variations in retail sales and in business and consumer confidence and consumer spending on retail goods. Although we have adapted our properties to rely less on traditional retail and include more community-centric mixed-uses, we remain subject to a number of factors that can negatively affect the income generated by a retail property or the value of a property, including: a downturn in the national, regional or local economy; a decrease in employment or consumer confidence or spending; increases in operating costs, such as CAM, real estate taxes, utility rates and insurance premiums; higher energy or fuel costs resulting from adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, geopolitical concerns, terrorist activities and other factors; changes in interest rate levels and the cost and availability of financing; a weakening of local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the availability and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants; trends in the retail industry; seasonality; changes in perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of a retail property; perceived changes in the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing options such as internet shopping or other strategies, such as using smartphones or other technologies to determine where to make and to assist in making purchases; tenants’ ability to innovate or change their business models at a pace sufficient to adapt to the evolving consumer landscape; the ability of our tenants to meet shoppers’ demands for quality, variety, and product availability, which may be impacted by supply chain disruptions; and changes in laws and regulations applicable to real property, including tax and zoning laws. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in travel restrictions and plant shutdowns, which impacted our tenants’ supply chains and, ultimately, retail product availability. Even as quarantine and other business restrictions have been relaxed, ongoing supply chain and labor force challenges have impacted product availability and ability to operate at full capacity. Continuing fears related to the continually evolving COVID-19 pandemic could impact shoppers’ willingness to visit our retail properties and the continued spread of the virus and emergence of numerous variants has led to operational changes in our mall environments to allow for social distancing and to provide enhanced health and safety measures. The extent and duration of the pandemic and its impact on our tenants and our operations is uncertain, but the longer the pandemic continues, the greater the risk is that its effects and various measures taken in response could continue to adversely affect us.

Changes in one or more of the aforementioned factors can lead to a decrease in the revenue or income generated by our properties and can have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Many of these factors could also specifically or disproportionately affect one or more of our tenants, which could lead to decreased operating performance, reduce property revenue and affect our results of operations. If the estimated future cash flows related to a particular property are significantly reduced, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of the property.

The retail real estate industry is highly competitive, and this competition could harm our ability to operate profitably.

Competition in the retail real estate market is intense. We compete with other public and private retail real estate companies, including companies that own or manage malls, power centers, strip centers, lifestyle centers, factory outlet centers, theme/festival centers and community centers, as well as other commercial real estate developers and real estate owners, particularly those with properties near our properties, on the basis of several factors, including location and rent charged. We compete with these companies to attract customers to our properties, as well as to attract anchor and non-anchor store and other tenants. Our malls and our other operating properties face competition from similar retail, destination dining and entertainment centers, including more recently developed or renovated centers that are near our retail properties. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources or have different investment criteria than we do, a competitive factor that could become even more relevant as competitors gain size and economies of scale as a result of merger and consolidation activity. We also face competition from a variety of different retail formats, including internet retailers, discount or value retailers, home shopping networks, mail order operators, catalogs, and telemarketers. Our tenants face competition from companies at the same and other properties and from other retail formats as well, including internet retailers. Further, the increased use of online retail shopping may lead to the closure of underperforming stores by retailers, which could impact our occupancy levels and the rates that tenants are willing to pay to lease our space. They also face competition for employees in the current highly constrained labor market, which could impact their operations and operating costs. This competition could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the amount of rent and expense reimbursements that we receive.

The existence or development of competing retail properties and the related increased competition for tenants might, subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would have deferred or would not have otherwise planned to make, and might also affect the total sales, occupancy and net operating income of such properties. Any such capital

improvements, undertaken individually or collectively, would involve costs and expenses that could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, such costs and expenses could lead to greater earnings volatility than would be experienced by our larger competitors.

Acts of violence or war or other terrorist activity, including at our properties, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Violent activities, terrorist or other attacks, threats of attacks or the increased frequency of such attacks or threats of attacks could directly affect the value of our properties as a result of casualties or through property damage, destruction or loss, or by making shoppers afraid to patronize such properties. The availability of insurance for such acts, or of insurance generally, might decrease, or cost more, which could increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Future acts of violence or terrorist attacks in the United States might result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for goods and services offered by our tenants and the value of our properties, and might adversely affect the value of an investment in our securities. Such a decrease in retail demand could make it difficult for us to renew leases or enter into new leases at our properties at lease rates equal to or above historical rates. To the extent that our tenants are directly or indirectly affected by future attacks, their businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to meet obligations under their existing leases. Customers of the tenants at an affected property, and at other properties, might be less inclined to shop at an affected location or at a retail property generally. Such acts might erode business and consumer confidence and spending, and might result in increased volatility in national and international financial markets and economies. Any such acts could decrease demand for retail goods or real estate, decrease or delay the occupancy of our properties, and limit our access to capital or increase our cost of raising capital.

Social unrest and acts of vandalism or violence could adversely affect our business operations.

Our business may be adversely affected by social, political, and economic instability, unrest, or disruption, including protests, demonstrations, strikes, riots, civil disturbance, disobedience, insurrection and looting in geographic regions where our properties are located. Such events may result in property damage and destruction and in restrictions, curfews, or other governmental actions that could give rise to significant changes in economic conditions and cycles, which may adversely affect our financial condition and operations.

In 2020 and 2021, there have been demonstrations and protests, some of which involved violence, looting, arson and property destruction, in cities throughout the United States. While the majority of protests have been peaceful, looting, vandalism and fires have taken place in certain places, which led to the imposition of mandatory curfews and, in some locations, deployment of the National Guard. Governmental actions taken to protect people and property, including curfews and restrictions on business operations, may disrupt operations, harm perceptions of personal well-being and increase the need for additional expenditures on security resources. The effect and frequency of the demonstrations, protests or other factors is uncertain, and we cannot assure there will not be further political or in the future or that there will not be other events that could lead to further social, political and economic instability. If such events or disruptions persist for a prolonged period of time, our overall business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The illiquidity of real estate investments might delay or prevent us from selling properties that we determine no longer meet the strategic and financial criteria we apply and could significantly affect our ability to respond in a timely manner to adverse changes in the performance of our properties and harm our financial condition.

Substantially all of our assets consist of investments in real properties. We review all of the assets in our portfolio regularly and we make determinations about which assets have growth potential and which properties do not meet the strategic or financial criteria we apply and should thus be divested. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to quickly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to our evaluation or to changing economic and financial conditions is limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors that are beyond our control, such as general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates, and the supply and demand for space. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms we set, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. The number of prospective buyers interested in purchasing malls is limited. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. In addition, prospective buyers might experience increased costs of debt financing or other difficulties in obtaining debt financing (as the volatility in the credit markets may be reflected in lending on unfavorable terms to the retail industry), which might make it more difficult for us to sell properties or might adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell. In the recent past, we have sold various properties, including land parcels for development, and entered into agreements to sell others, and the sale process has taken an extended period, often subject to delays, in order to complete diligence and secure entitlements. Further, we have entered into agreements to sell properties that were delayed and then terminated because the purchaser was unable to raise sufficient financing for closing. There are also limitations under federal income tax laws applicable to REITs that could limit our ability to sell assets. In addition, because our properties are mortgaged to secure our debts, we may not be able to secure a release of a lien on a mortgaged property without payment of the associated debt and/or a substantial prepayment penalty, or transfer of a debt to a buyer, which restricts our ability to dispose of property, even though the sale might otherwise be desirable. Therefore, if we want to sell one or more of our properties, we might not be able to make such dispositions in the desired time period, or at all, and might

receive less consideration than we seek or than we originally invested in the property. Additionally, the terms of our Credit Agreements require us to apply a portion of the net cash proceeds of asset dispositions as prepayments under the Credit Agreements.

Before a property can be sold, we might be required to make expenditures to correct defects or to make improvements. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to make those improvements, and if we cannot do so, we might not be able to sell the property, or might be required to sell the property on unfavorable terms. In acquiring a property, we might agree with the sellers or others to provisions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as limitations on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could significantly harm our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, failure to sell the properties that we intend to sell could delay or negatively affect our strategy to obtain higher rental rates from retailers with multiple stores in our portfolios, including at these properties.

We have substantial debt and preferred shares outstanding with substantial liquidation preference, which could adversely affect our overall financial health and our operating flexibility. We require significant cash flows to satisfy our debt service. These obligations may prevent us from using our cash flows for other purposes. If we are unable to satisfy these obligations, we might default on our debt and our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We use a substantial amount of debt and preferred shares outstanding to finance our business, including through indebtedness secured by mortgages and deeds of trust on our properties. As of December 31, 2021, we had an aggregate consolidated indebtedness of $1,872.7 million, substantially all of which is secured by our assets, including mortgages on our properties. These aggregate debt amounts do not include our proportionate share of indebtedness of our partnership properties, which was $381.0 million as of December 31, 2021. We also had outstanding as of December 31, 2021, in the aggregate, $95.8 million of 7.375% Series B Preferred Shares, $191.1 million of 7.20% Series C Preferred Shares and $137.9 million of 6.875% Series D Preferred Shares.

Our substantial indebtedness involves significant obligations for the payment of interest and principal. Our first and second lien Credit Agreements mature and come due in December 2022, subject to a one-year extension to December 2023 at our option, subject to minimum liquidity of $35.0 million, a minimum corporate debt yield of 8.0%, a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 105% as determined by an appraisal and no default or event of default existing. If we are unable to meet the conditions to extend the maturity date of our Credit Agreements, or if we do not have sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our payment obligations, we might be forced to sell assets to generate cash, which might be on unfavorable terms, if at all, or we might not be able to make all required payments of principal and interest on our debt, which could result in a default or have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We are not currently paying dividends on our preferred shares due to, among other things, restrictions in our credit facilities. As a result, unpaid dividends are accruing and increasing the liquidation amount of our preferred shares. Because we have not paid dividends on the preferred shares for six quarters, the holders of the outstanding preferred shares, voting together as a single class, have the right to elect two additional trustees to our Board. On February 23, 2022, we received a notice from a holder of the outstanding preferred proposing to nominate two individuals to be elected to serve as two additional trustees to our Board at our upcoming 2022 annual meeting. As of December 31, 2021, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends on the outstanding preferred shares totaled approximately $41.1 million. See “—We could face adverse consequences as a result of the actions of activist shareholders” for a description of risks related to the election of trustees by holders of our preferred shares.

Our substantial obligations arising from our indebtedness could also have other negative consequences to our shareholders, including the acceleration of a significant amount of our debt if we are not in compliance with the terms of such debt or, if such debt contains cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions (as our Credit Agreements do), other debt. If we fail to meet our obligations under our debt, we could lose assets due to foreclosure or sale on unfavorable terms, which could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, or such failure could harm our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions, redevelopment and development activities, execution of our business strategy or other general corporate purposes. Also, our indebtedness and mandated debt service might limit our ability to refinance existing debt or to do so at a reasonable cost, might make us more vulnerable to adverse economic and market conditions, might limit our ability to respond to competition or to take advantage of opportunities, and might discourage business partners from working with us or counterparties from entering into hedging transactions with us.

Furthermore, since a significant percentage of our assets are used to secure our debt, this reduces the amount of collateral available for future secured debt or credit support and reduces our flexibility in operating these secured assets. This relatively high level of debt and related security could also limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy or other purposes and could limit our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service debt.

In addition to our current debt, we might incur additional debt in the future in the form of mortgage loans, unsecured borrowings, additional borrowing under our existing Credit Agreements, other term loan borrowings or other financing vehicles or arrangements. We might do so in order to finance development or redevelopment of properties, acquisitions or for other general corporate purposes, subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, which could exacerbate the risks described above. These consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The covenants in our Credit Agreements limit our ability to take certain actions, which could adversely affect our business and our ability to raise capital.

The terms of our Credit Agreements place restrictions on, among other things, our ability to make certain restricted payments (including distributions to shareholders, subject to limited exceptions including to preserve REIT status), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities (subject to exceptions for shares that are redeemable solely in exchange for common shares or other equivalents), incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate, or sell our assets or the equity interests of our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. These restrictions could limit our ability to respond to changes and competition and reduce our flexibility in conducting our operations, including by restricting our ability to manage our cash flows, pursue acquisitions and redevelopment and development projects, and raise capital through securities offerings. The terms of our Credit Agreements also restrict us, subject to certain exceptions, from entering into certain major leases, assigning leases, discounting rent under certain leases, collecting rent in advance, terminating or modifying certain leases, consenting to tenants’ assignment or subletting of certain leases, or subordinating leases.

Additionally, if we receive net cash proceeds from certain capital events (including equity issuances), we are required to prepay loans under our Credit Agreements. In addition, the Credit Agreements contain, and any future debt agreements may contain, cross-default provisions that trigger an event of default if we fail to make certain payments or otherwise fail to comply with our obligations with respect to certain of our other indebtedness. Our continued ability to borrow under the Credit Agreements and any other indebtedness that we have or may obtain will be subject to compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreements or in the debt agreement governing such other indebtedness.

Furthermore, as a result of the existing cumulative unpaid dividends on our preferred shares and our bankruptcy filing, we are no longer able to register the offer and sale of securities on Form S-3. This creates limitations on our ability to raise capital in the capital markets, potentially increasing our costs of raising capital in the future.

The restrictions on our business imposed by the terms of our Credit Agreements could adversely affect our business generally in addition to our ability to raise capital and our results of operations, cash flow and ability to make capital expenditures in the future.

If we are unable to comply with the covenants in our Credit Agreements, we might be adversely affected.

As discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Identical covenants and common provisions contained in the Credit Agreements,” on December 10, 2020, we entered into agreements for secured credit facilities as part of our restructuring efforts upon emergence from bankruptcy and in accordance with the Plan. Our Credit Agreements require us to satisfy certain affirmative and negative covenants (including maintaining minimum liquidity of $25 million) and to meet certain financial tests, including tests relating to our corporate debt yield and senior debt yield. As of December 31, 2021, the maximum amount that was available to be borrowed by us under the First Lien Revolving Facility was $75.5 million, which is not reduced by any usage of the borrowing capacity to fulfill our unrestricted cash liquidity requirement of $25 million as described further in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all the financial covenants in our Credit Agreements, however, a material decline in future operating results could affect our ability to comply with these covenants. Particularly in light of recent property sales, reduction in our asset base and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, we are at increased risk of being unable to comply with these covenants or having reduced borrowing capacity in the future. We expect the current conditions in the economy and the retail industry, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting unprecedented global economic disruption (including disruptions to our and our tenants’ businesses and operations), to continue to materially affect our operating results. Furthermore, to determine our compliance with the Credit Agreements, including the covenants, we must apply our judgment to our facts, taking into account our past practice, and interpret the contractual provisions in the agreements. To the extent that our lenders interpret these differently than us, we may have disagreements or disputes, and if we are unable to resolve them, these disagreements may result in material limitations on our ability to access funding under the facility, protracted negotiations, and/or legal proceedings.

We regularly engage in discussions with lenders that participate in our credit facilities regarding our capital and liquidity resources and needs, including, as appropriate, to explore alternatives and ensure that we will remain in compliance with our financial covenants and have continued access to funding under the facilities, which alternatives may include waivers or amendments. There is no assurance that we could obtain such agreements, waivers or amendments, and even if obtained, we would likely incur additional costs. Our inability to comply with the terms of our credit agreements or to obtain any such agreement, waiver or amendment could result in a breach and a possible event of default under our Credit Agreements, which could allow the lenders to discontinue lending or issuing letters of credit, terminate any commitments they have made to provide us with additional funds, declare amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable, and/or take possession of the property or properties securing such debt. If a default were to occur, we might have to refinance the debt through secured or unsecured debt financing or private or public offerings of debt or equity securities. If we are unable to do so, we might have to liquidate assets, potentially on unfavorable terms. No assurance can be provided that we would be able to liquidate assets in a timely fashion or in satisfaction of our obligations.

Any of the factors described above could negatively affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make capital expenditures in the future.

We have determined that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In evaluating whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued, our management considered our current financial condition and liquidity sources, including current funds available, forecasted future cash flows and our conditional and unconditional obligations due over the next twelve months. Management specifically considered the FDP Loan Agreement, which includes a quarterly debt yield covenant and a loan balance of $194.6 million as of December 31, 2021 with a maturity date of January 2023 (unless extended by one year upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions), and for which PREIT Associates, L.P. has guaranteed 50% of the borrowers’ obligations thereunder. As a result of the considerations articulated below, management concluded there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.

The FDP Loan Agreement has a balance of $194.6 million at December 31, 2021, maturing January 2023, with an option to extend maturity to January 2024. This agreement also contains a 10% quarterly debt yield covenant beginning on December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, the FDP joint venture entity borrower, PM Gallery L.P., did not meet the minimum 10% debt yield covenant, which triggered the lender to sweep cash from the property. This is not an event of default. As of June 30, 2022, the debt yield covenant threshold is 9%, subsequent to which the joint venture would be required to pay down the term loan to achieve a 9% debt yield. Based on the joint venture’s current forecast, management projects that the joint venture will not be able to meet this covenant as the debt yield is projected to be under 9%. To the extent the term loan is not paid down by the joint venture, this term loan could become due and payable during the second half of 2022. The Company guarantees 50% of the joint venture’s obligations under the FDP Loan Agreement and management projects that the Company would not be able to satisfy its obligations if the FDP term loan would become due and payable in 2022. The Company plans to work with its joint venture partner to satisfy any obligations coming due under the FDP Loan Agreement should it become due and payable as a result of the joint venture not meeting the debt yield covenant. If, however, the administrative agent makes a demand of payment under our guarantee, there are circumstances, including the commencement of court proceedings under that guarantee, under which the default under the FDP Loan Agreement could give rise to an event of default under our Credit Agreements, which would permit our lenders to exercise remedies including to accelerate the payment obligations thereunder.

Although we plan to work with our joint venture partner to obtain the financial support necessary to satisfy any obligations coming due under the FDP Loan Agreement should it become due and payable as a result of not meeting the debt yield covenant, there are inherent risks, unknown results and significant uncertainties associated with this matter and a direct correlation to our ability to satisfy our financial obligations that may arise over the applicable twelve month period. Our ability to obtain relief from the FDP Loan Agreement lender involves performance by third parties and therefore cannot be considered probable of occurring.

The consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Management is taking steps to mitigate the associated risks, but we can provide no assurance that cash generated from our operations together with cash received in the future from our various sources of funding will be sufficient to enable us to continue as a going concern.

Secured indebtedness exposes us to the possibility of foreclosure, which could result in the loss of our investment in certain of our subsidiaries or in a property or group of properties or other assets subject to indebtedness.

We have granted our lenders security interests in a portfolio of our assets, including equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries and in certain of our real property. Incurring secured indebtedness, including mortgage indebtedness, increases our risk of asset and property losses because defaults on indebtedness secured by our assets, including equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries and in certain of our real property, may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and ultimately our loss of the property or other assets securing any loans for which we are in default.

Any foreclosure on a mortgaged property or group of properties could have a material adverse effect on the overall value of our portfolio of properties and more generally on our business. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the indebtedness secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the indebtedness secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not

receive any cash proceeds, which could materially and adversely affect us. As a result, our substantial secured indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We might not be able to refinance our existing obligations or obtain the capital required to finance our activities.

The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally require the distribution to shareholders of 90% of a REIT’s net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, which generally leaves insufficient funds to finance major initiatives internally. Due to these requirements, and subject to the terms of the Credit Agreements, we generally fund certain capital requirements, such as the capital for renovations, expansions, redevelopments, other non-recurring capital improvements, scheduled debt maturities, and acquisitions of properties or other assets, through secured and unsecured indebtedness and, when available and market conditions are favorable, the issuance of additional equity securities.

As of December 31, 2021, our mortgage loans are secured by nine of our consolidated properties and are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2025. Also, we estimate that we will need $4.3 million of additional capital to complete our current redevelopment projects, including the completion of redevelopment at FDP, which opened on September 19, 2019. Our ability to finance growth from financing sources depends, in part, on our creditworthiness, the availability of credit to us from financing sources, or the market for our debt, equity or equity-related securities when we need capital, and on conditions in the capital markets generally. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for information about our available sources of funds. There can be no assurances that we will continue to be able to obtain the financing we need for future growth or to meet our debt service as obligations mature, or that the financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. A lack of acceptable financing could delay or hinder our growth initiatives, or prevent us from implementing our initiatives on satisfactory terms.

If our mortgage loans and other debts cannot be repaid in full, refinanced or extended at maturity on acceptable terms, or at all, a lender could foreclose upon the mortgaged property and receive an assignment of rent and leases or pursue other remedies, or we might be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties on unfavorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and which might adversely affect our cash flow.

Payments by our direct and indirect subsidiaries of dividends and distributions to us might be adversely affected by their obligations to make prior payments to the creditors of these subsidiaries.

We own substantially all of our assets through our interest in PREIT Associates. PREIT Associates holds substantially all of its properties and assets through subsidiaries, including subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies, and derives substantially all of its cash flow from cash distributions to it by its subsidiaries. We, in turn, derive substantially all of our cash flow from cash distributions to us by PREIT Associates. Our direct and indirect subsidiaries must make payments on their obligations to their creditors when due and payable before they may make distributions to us. Thus, PREIT Associates’ ability to make distributions to its partners, including us, depends on its subsidiaries’ ability first to satisfy their obligations to their creditors. Similarly, our ability to pay dividends to holders of our shares depends on PREIT Associates’ ability first to satisfy its obligations to its creditors before making distributions to us. If the subsidiaries were unable to make payments to their creditors when due and payable, or if the subsidiaries had insufficient funds both to make payments to creditors and distribute funds to PREIT Associates, we might not have sufficient cash to satisfy our obligations and/or make distributions to our shareholders. Furthermore, our credit facilities limit our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common and preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions. Even if permissible under our credit facilities, we do not anticipate paying dividends on our shares in the foreseeable future. See “—We do not anticipate paying dividends on our shares in the foreseeable future” for additional information on the limitations imposed by our credit facilities on our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

In addition, we will only have the right to participate in any distribution of the assets of any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency of such subsidiary after the claims of the creditors, including mortgage lenders and trade creditors, of that subsidiary are satisfied. Our shareholders, in turn, will have the right to participate in any distribution of our assets upon our liquidation, reorganization or insolvency only after the claims of our creditors, including trade creditors, are satisfied.

Some of our properties are owned or ground-leased by subsidiaries that we created solely to own or ground-lease those properties. The mortgaged properties and related assets are restricted solely for the payment of the related loans and are not available to pay our other debts, which could impair our ability to borrow, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We are subject to risks associated with increases in interest rates, including in connection with our variable interest rate debt.

As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.2 billion of indebtedness with variable interest rates, although we have fixed the interest rates on an aggregate of $300.0 million of this variable rate debt by using derivative instruments. In addition, our unconsolidated partnerships have $121.8 million, at our proportionate share, of indebtedness with variable rates. We might incur additional variable rate debt in the future, and, if we do

so, the proportion of our debt with variable interest rates might increase. See “Part I. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

An increase in market interest rates applicable to the variable portion of the debt portfolio would increase the interest incurred and cash flows necessary to service such debt, subject to our hedging arrangements on such debt. This has and could, in the future, adversely affect our results of operations. Also, in coming years, as our current mortgage loans mature, if these mortgage loans are refinanced at higher interest rates than the rates in effect at the time of the prior loans, our interest expense in connection with debt secured by our properties will increase, and could adversely affect our results of operations.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) announced it would no longer compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative to USD-LIBOR. The FCA no longer publishes one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rates and plans to cease publishing all other LIBOR tenors (overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month) on June 30, 2023. It is not presently known whether SOFR or any other alternative reference rates will attain broad market acceptance as replacements of LIBOR. There remains uncertainty as to how the financial services industry will address the discontinuance of LIBOR in financial instruments that are indexed to LIBOR. Further, various financial instruments indexed to LIBOR could experience different outcomes based on their contractual terms, ability to amend those terms, market or product type, legal or regulatory jurisdiction, and other factors. Alternative reference rates that replace LIBOR may not yield the same or similar economic results over the lives of the financial instruments, which could adversely affect the value of and return on these instruments.

As of December 31, 2021, we had borrowings under our Credit Agreements and mortgage loans of $1.4 billion with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. We are monitoring and evaluating the risks related to changes in LIBOR availability, which include potential changes in interest paid on debt and amounts received and paid on interest rate swaps and other derivative instruments. These risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to a new alternative rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans, securities, and derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be affected if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require negotiation with the respective counterparty.

If a contract is not transitioned to an alternative rate and LIBOR is discontinued, the impact on our contracts is likely to vary by contract. If LIBOR is phased out and changes are implemented, interest rates on our current or future indebtedness may be adversely affected.

Our actual financial results after emergence from bankruptcy may not be comparable to our historical financial information as a result of the implementation of the Plan and the transactions contemplated thereby.

In the Disclosure Statement Relating to the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of Its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries (including any exhibits, appendices, schedules, ballots and related documents thereto, the “Disclosure Statement”) that we filed pursuant to section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court during the Chapter 11 Cases, we included financial projections as required by the Bankruptcy Code to demonstrate to the bankruptcy court the feasibility of the Plan and establish that we will have sufficient liquidity and be able to meet our financial obligations under the Plan and in the ordinary course of our business upon emergence from bankruptcy. Those projections were prepared solely for the purpose of the bankruptcy proceedings and have not been, and will not be, updated on an ongoing basis and should not be relied upon by investors. At the time they were prepared, the projections included in the Disclosure Statement reflected numerous assumptions concerning our then-anticipated future performance and with respect to prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and remain beyond our control and that may not materialize. Projections are inherently subject to substantial and numerous uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic and competitive risks, including risks related to or deriving from the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, and the assumptions underlying the projections and/or valuation estimates may ultimately prove to be inaccurate in material respects. There is no guarantee that the financial projections included in the Disclosure Statement will be realized, and actual results may vary significantly from those contemplated by the projections. As a result, investors should not consider the financial projections to be assurances or guarantees of future performance.

Our organizational documents contain provisions that might discourage a takeover of us and depress our share price.

Our organizational documents contain, or might contain in the future, provisions that might have an anti-takeover effect and might inhibit a change in our management and the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our securities. These provisions currently include:

(2) Our Trust Agreement permits our Board of Trustees to issue preferred shares with terms that might discourage a third party from acquiring the Company. Our Trust Agreement permits our Board of Trustees to create and issue multiple classes and series of preferred shares, and classes and series of preferred shares having preferences to the existing shares on any matter, without a vote of shareholders, including preferences in rights in liquidation or to dividends and option rights, and other securities having conversion or option rights. Also, the Board might authorize the creation and issuance by our subsidiaries and affiliates of securities having conversion and option rights in respect of our shares. Our Trust Agreement further provides that the terms of such rights or other securities might provide for disparate treatment of certain holders or groups of holders of such rights or other securities. The issuance of such rights or other securities could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of us, even if a change in control were in our shareholders’ interest or would give the shareholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our securities.

(3) Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder Nominations of Trustees. The Company’s advance notice procedures with regard to shareholder proposals relating to the nomination of candidates for election as trustees, as provided in our amended and restated Trust Agreement, require, among other things, that advance written notice of any such proposals, containing prescribed information, be given to our Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s meeting (or within 10 business days of the day notice is given of the annual meeting date, if the annual meeting date is not within 30 days of the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting).

Limited partners of PREIT Associates may vote on certain fundamental changes we propose, which could inhibit a change in control that might otherwise result in a premium to our shareholders.

Our assets generally are held through our interests in PREIT Associates. We currently hold a majority of the outstanding limited partnership interests (“OP Units”) in PREIT Associates. However, PREIT Associates might, from time to time, issue additional OP Units to third parties in exchange for contributions of property to PREIT Associates in amounts that could, individually or in the aggregate, be substantial. These issuances will dilute our percentage ownership of PREIT Associates. OP Units generally do not carry a right to vote on any matter voted on by our shareholders, although OP Units might, under certain circumstances, be redeemed for our shares. However, before the date on which at least half of the units issued on September 30, 1997 in connection with our acquisition of The Rubin Organization have been redeemed, the holders of units issued on September 30, 1997 are entitled to vote such units together with our shareholders, as a single class, on any proposal

to merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of our assets. Joseph F. Coradino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is among the holders of these units.

These existing rights could inhibit a change in control that might otherwise result in a premium to our shareholders. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will not agree to extend comparable rights to other limited partners in PREIT Associates.

We have, in the past, and might again, in the future, enter into tax protection agreements for the benefit of certain former property owners, including some limited partners of PREIT Associates, that might affect our ability to sell or refinance some of our properties that we might otherwise want to sell or refinance, which could harm our financial condition.

As the general partner of PREIT Associates, we have previously agreed to indemnify certain former property owners against tax liabilities that they might incur if we sell a property in a taxable transaction or significantly reduce the debt secured by a property acquired from them within a certain number of years after we acquired it, and we might do so again in the future. In some cases, these agreements might make it uneconomical for us to sell or refinance these properties, even in circumstances in which it otherwise would be advantageous to do so, which could interfere with our ability to execute strategic dispositions, harm our ability to address liquidity needs in the future or otherwise harm our financial condition.

We could face adverse consequences as a result of the actions of activist shareholders.

In recent years, proxy contests and other forms of shareholder activism have been directed against numerous public companies, including us. Shareholders may engage in proxy solicitations, advance shareholder proposals, or otherwise attempt to effect changes in or acquire control over us. Campaigns by shareholders to effect changes at publicly traded companies are sometimes led by investors seeking to increase short-term shareholder value through actions such as financial restructuring, increased debt, special dividends, share repurchases, or sales of assets or the entire company. Shareholder activists may also seek to involve themselves in the governance, strategic direction and operations of the company.

If a shareholder, by itself or in conjunction with other shareholders or as part of a group, engages in activist activities with respect to us, our business could be adversely affected because responding to proxy contests and other actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, potentially disrupting operations and diverting the attention of our Board of Trustees, senior management and employees from the execution of business strategies. In addition, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction might result in the loss of potential business opportunities and harm our ability to attract new tenants, customers and investors. If individuals are elected to our Board of Trustees with a specific agenda, it might adversely affect our ability to effectively and timely implement our strategies and initiatives and to retain and attract experienced executives and employees. Finally, we might experience a significant increase in legal fees and administrative and associated costs incurred in connection with responding to a proxy contest or related action. These actions could also negatively affect our share price.

Because we have not paid dividends on our outstanding preferred shares for six quarters, the holders of the outstanding preferred shares, voting together as a single class, have the right to elect two additional trustees to our Board. On February 23, 2022, we received a notice from a holder of the outstanding preferred proposing to nominate two individuals to be elected to serve as two additional trustees to our Board at our upcoming 2022 annual meeting. If the holders of our outstanding preferred shares elect additional trustees with a specific agenda (such as pursuing strategies to benefit holders of our preferred shares), the risks described above could be exacerbated.

A few significant shareholders may influence or control the direction of our business, and, if the ownership of our common shares continues to be concentrated, or becomes more concentrated in the future, it could prevent our other shareholders from influencing significant corporate decisions.

As of December 31, 2021, a small number of individual shareholders together own or control more than 10% of our outstanding common shares. Although these investors do not act as a group, they may be able to exercise influence over matters requiring shareholder approval,

including approval of significant corporate transactions that might affect the price of our shares. The concentration of ownership of our shares held by these investors may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without their support.

The interests of these investors may conflict with our interests or the interests of our other shareholders. For example, the concentration of ownership with these investors could allow them to influence our policies and strategies and could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or business combination from occurring that might otherwise be favorable to us and our other shareholders.

Holders of our common shares might have their interest in us diluted by actions we take in the future.

We continue to contemplate ways to reduce our leverage through a variety of means available to us, subject to the terms of the Credit Agreements. These means might include obtaining equity capital, including through the issuance of common or preferred equity or equity-related securities if market conditions are favorable. In addition, we might contemplate acquisitions of properties or portfolios, and we might issue equity, in the form of common shares, OP Units or other equity securities in consideration for such acquisitions, potentially in substantial amounts. Any issuance of equity securities might result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common shares held by our then existing shareholders, and the interest of our shareholders might be materially adversely affected. The market price of our common shares could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares in the market or the perception that such sales could occur. Additionally, future sales or issuances of substantial amounts of our common shares might be at prices below the then-current market price of our common shares and might adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

Many factors, including changes in interest rates and the negative perceptions of the retail sector generally, can have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

As is the case with other publicly traded companies, a number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

Our Credit Agreements limit our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common and preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions, and thus we have deferred payments on our preferred shares and suspended payments on our common shares. We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our common or preferred shares for the foreseeable future. Any future payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will depend on numerous factors in addition to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, including our cash flow, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and other factors that our Board of Trustees deems relevant. We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay dividends on our shares in the future. Consequently, you should not rely on dividends to receive a return on your investment. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect the market price of our publicly traded securities.

Because we have not paid dividends on our outstanding preferred shares for six quarters, the holders of the outstanding preferred shares, voting together as a single class, have the right to elect two additional trustees to our Board. On February 23, 2022, we received a notice from a holder of the outstanding preferred proposing to nominate two individuals to be elected to serve as two additional trustees to our Board at our upcoming 2022 annual meeting. This could have an adverse impact on our governance and on the interests of our shareholders other than the holders of our preferred shares if additional trustees are elected and focus primarily on pursuing strategies to benefit holders of our preferred shares.

The dividend arrearage created by the suspension of dividends that continue to accrue on our outstanding preferred shares also will require that we not resume any payment of cash dividends on our common shares unless full cumulative dividends accrued with respect to our preferred shares for all past quarters have been paid (or funds have been set apart for payment of such dividends). We suspended our Distribution Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) effective as of September 24, 2020 and, due in part to the fact that we are no longer able to register the offer and sale of securities on Form S-3, we have no present intention to reactivate the DRIP.

Individual taxpayers might perceive REIT securities as less desirable relative to the securities of other corporations because of the lower tax rate on certain dividends from such corporations, to the extent we pay dividends in the future, which might have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

Currently, the maximum federal income tax rate on dividends, excluding tax on net investment income, from most publicly traded corporations is 20%. Dividends from REITs, however, do not qualify for this favorable tax treatment, and the maximum federal income tax rate on dividends from REITs is 29.6% (which excludes tax on new investment income). It is possible also that tax legislation enacted in subsequent years might increase this rate differential. Our credit facilities limit our ability to pay dividends on our common and preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions, and thus we have deferred payments on our preferred shares and suspended payments on our common shares. To the extent we pay dividends in the future, the differing treatment of dividends received from REITs and other corporations might cause individual investors to view an investment in REITs as less attractive relative to other corporations, which might negatively affect the value of our shares.

Our common shares could be delisted from the NYSE if we fail to meet applicable continued listing requirements, which could have materially adverse effects on our business.

Our common shares are listed on the NYSE and, as such, are subject to the exchange’s listing standards, including the requirement to maintain an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share. In 2020, we were notified by NYSE that we had failed to meet such requirement, but regained compliance as of December 31, 2020 after the closing price for our common shares on December 31, 2020 and the average closing price for our common shares during the 30 trading-day period ended December 31, 2020 both exceeded $1.00.

Although we have maintained compliance as of December 31, 2021, during 2021, the closing price for our common shares has ranged from a low of $0.88 per share to a high of $3.17 per share. Accordingly, there is a risk we may fail to continue to meet this listing standard and, if we fail to comply in the future, in accordance with Rule 802.01D of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, the NYSE may suspend and delist our common shares and preferred shares. On February 4, 2022, we received a notice from NYSE that we are no longer in compliance with the NYSE continued listing standard set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE's Listed Company Manual, and we have notified the NYSE that we intend to cure the deficiency. The threat of delisting and/or a delisting of our shares could have adverse effects by, among other things:

Any additional issuances of preferred shares in the future might adversely affect the earnings per share available to common shareholders and amounts available to common shareholders for any future payments of dividends.

The market value of our common shares is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings, net operating income, funds from operations, our liquidity and capital resources, and cash distributions. Consequently, our common shares might trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per common share. If our future earnings, net operating income, funds from operations or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our common shares will decrease. These metrics might be adversely affected by the existence of preferred shares, including our existing preferred shares and any additional preferred shares that we might issue. Our Credit Agreements include certain restrictions on our ability to issue redeemable securities, subject to exceptions for shares that are redeemable solely in exchange for common shares or other equivalents, and further require us to make mandatory prepayments of loans upon receipt of certain threshold levels of net cash proceeds from equity issuances.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT or otherwise to comply with tax requirements applicable to REITs, our shareholders would be adversely affected.

We believe that we have qualified as a REIT since our inception and intend to continue to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, however, we must comply with certain highly technical and complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, which is complicated in the case of a REIT such as ours that holds its assets primarily in partnership form. We cannot be certain we have complied with these requirements because there are very limited judicial and administrative interpretations of these provisions, and even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. In addition, facts and circumstances that might be beyond our control might affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. We cannot assure you that new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws significantly with respect to our qualification as a REIT or with respect to the federal income tax consequences of qualification.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax, on our taxable income, if any, at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we first failed to qualify. Any such additional tax incurred at regular corporate rates could significantly reduce the cash flow available for future distribution to shareholders and for debt service. In addition, we would no longer be required to make any distributions to shareholders and our securities could be delisted from the exchange on which they are listed. If there were a determination that we do not qualify as a REIT, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and there could be a material reduction in the value of our common shares.

Furthermore, as a REIT, we might be subject to a 100% “prohibited transactions” tax on the gain from dispositions of property if we are deemed to hold the property primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, unless the disposition qualifies under a safe harbor exception for properties that have been held for at least two years and with respect to which certain other requirements are met. The potential application of the prohibited transactions tax could cause us to forego or delay potential dispositions of property or other opportunities that might otherwise be attractive to us, or to undertake such dispositions or other opportunities through a taxable REIT subsidiary, which would generally result in income taxes being incurred. A failure to comply with applicable REIT requirements regarding the minimum percentages of our income that must be derived from real estate or investment income might also result in additional tax liabilities for us.

We might be unable to comply with the strict income distribution requirements applicable to REITs, or compliance with such requirements could adversely affect our financial condition or cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with qualifying as a REIT, in general, we are required each year to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our net taxable income. In addition, we are subject to a tax on any undistributed portion of our income at regular corporate rates and might also be subject to a 4% excise tax on this undistributed income. We could be required to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT, even if conditions are not favorable for borrowing, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, compliance with these REIT requirements might cause us to forgo opportunities we would otherwise pursue.

Congress, the United States Treasury Department and the IRS frequently revise federal tax laws, regulations and other guidance. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted.

The federal tax legislation that was signed into law on December 22, 2017 (the ‘‘Act’’) made a large quantity of changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Among those changes were a significant reduction in the generally applicable corporate income tax rate (from a top corporate rate of 35% to a flat 21% rate), and a reduction in the rates of taxation on most ordinary REIT dividends to individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers (from a top marginal income tax rate of 39.6% to a top marginal income tax rate of 29.6%, plus, in each case, a 3.8% Medicare tax on net investment income) so as to be lower than the rate applicable to other ordinary income recognized by such taxpayers. The Act also imposes certain additional limitations on the deduction of net operating losses, which may in the future require us to make distributions that will be taxable to our stockholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits in order to comply with the annual REIT distribution requirements.

We also cannot predict the impact that any future federal tax legislation may have on REITs or our tenants. Any such legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of us and/or our shareholders. Any legislative action might also negatively affect our tenants and, in turn, affect their ability to pay rent, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We could face possible adverse federal, state and local tax audits and changes in state and local tax laws, which might result in an increase in our tax liability.

In the normal course of business, certain subsidiaries through which we own real estate have undergone, are currently undergoing or may undergo tax audits. There can be no assurance that the ultimate outcomes of any such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

From time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which might result in an increase in our tax liability including potentially increases in the real estate taxes due on the properties we own. The shortfall in tax revenue for many states and municipalities in recent years might lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes. If such changes occur, we might be required to pay additional taxes on our assets, including our properties, or income. We might be unable to effectively pass these increased costs onto our existing tenants and such increased costs may make our properties less appealing to renewing tenants and potential new tenants, which could negatively affect our occupancy rates. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We currently own interests in 25 properties, of which 24 are operating properties and one is a development property. The 24 operating properties include 20 shopping malls and four other retail properties, have a total of 19.6 million square feet and are located in eight states. We and partnerships in which we hold an interest own 15.1 million square feet at these properties (excluding space owned by anchors or third parties).

There are 17 operating retail properties in our portfolio that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes. These consolidated properties have a total of 14.6 million square feet, of which we own 11.4 million square feet. The seven operating retail properties that are owned by unconsolidated partnerships with third parties have a total of 5.0 million square feet, of which 3.6 million square feet are owned by such partnerships. When we refer to “Same Store” properties, we are referring to properties that have been owned for the full periods presented and exclude properties acquired, disposed of, under redevelopment or designated as a non-core property during the periods presented. Core properties include all operating retail properties except for Exton Square Mall. Valley View Mall was previously designated as a non-core property. As discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, a foreclosure sale judgment was ordered by the court after the property operations were assumed by a receiver on behalf of the lender under the mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall and we no longer operate the property. “Core Malls” also excludes these properties as well as power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.

In general, we own the land underlying our properties in fee or, in the case of our properties held by partnerships with others, ownership by the partnership entity is in fee. At certain properties, however, the underlying land is owned by third parties and leased to us or the partnership in which we hold an interest pursuant to long-term ground leases. In a ground lease, the building owner pays rent for the use of the land and is responsible for all costs and expenses related to the building and improvements.

See financial statement Schedule III for financial statement information regarding the consolidated properties.

The following tables present information regarding our retail properties. We refer to the total retail space of these properties, including anchors and non-anchor stores, as “total square feet,” and the portion that we own as “owned square feet.”

(1) The location stated is the major city or town nearest to the property and is not necessarily the local jurisdiction in which the property is located.

(2) Total square feet includes space owned by us and space owned by tenants or other lessors.

(3) Owned square feet includes only space owned by us and excludes space owned by tenants or other lessors.

(4) Occupancy is calculated based on space owned by us, excludes space owned by tenants or other lessors and includes space occupied by both anchor and non-anchor tenants, irrespective of the term of their agreements.

(5) Includes anchors/major tenants that own their space or lease from lessors other than us and do not pay rent to us.

(7) A portion of the underlying land at this property is subject to a ground lease.

(8) Former Sears was acquired by Cooper Hospital. This site is under development and not currently operating.

(1) The location stated is the major city or town nearest to the property and is not necessarily the local jurisdiction in which the property is located.

(2) Total square feet includes space owned by the unconsolidated partnership and space owned by tenants or other lessors.

(3) Owned square feet includes only space owned by the unconsolidated partnership and excludes space owned by tenants or other lessors.

(4) Occupancy is calculated based on space owned by the unconsolidated partnership, includes space occupied by both anchor and non-anchor tenants and includes all tenants irrespective of the term of their agreements.

(5) Includes anchors that own their space or lease from lessors other than us and do not pay rent to us.

The following table sets forth our average annual gross rent per square foot, under the terms of the leases (for consolidated and unconsolidated properties) for the five years ended December 31, 2021:

Historically, large format retailers and anchors have been an important element of attracting customers to a mall, and they have generally been department stores whose merchandise appeals to a broad range of customers, although in recent years we have attracted some non-traditional large format retailers. These large format retailers and anchors either own their stores, the land under them and adjacent parking areas, or enter into long-term leases at rent that is generally lower than the rent charged to in-line tenants. Well-known, large format retailers and anchors continue to play an important role in generating customer traffic and making malls desirable locations for in-line store tenants, even though the market share of traditional department store anchors has been declining and such companies have experienced significant changes. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Properties.” The following table indicates the parent company of each of our large format retailers and anchors and sets forth the number of stores and square feet owned or leased by each at our retail properties, including consolidated and unconsolidated, as of December 31, 2021:

(1) To qualify as a large format retailer or an anchor for inclusion in this table, a tenant must occupy at least 15,000 square feet.

(2) Number of stores and gross leasable area (“GLA”) include anchors that own their own space or lease from lessors other than us and do not pay rent to us. Includes stores that have closed that are still obligated to make rental or expense contribution payments.

(3) Percent of Total GLA is calculated based on the total GLA of all properties.

The following table presents information regarding the top 20 tenants at our retail properties, including consolidated and unconsolidated properties, by gross rent as of December 31, 2021:

(2) Includes our proportionate share of tenant rent from partnership properties that are not consolidated by us, based on our ownership percentage in the respective equity method investments. Annualized gross rent is calculated based on gross monthly rent as of December 31, 2021.

The following table presents scheduled lease expirations of non-anchor tenants as of December 31, 2021:

(1) Does not include tenants occupying space under license agreements with initial terms of less than one year. The GLA of these tenants is 667,984 square feet.

(2) Includes all tenant leases that had expired and were on a month to month basis as of December 31, 2021.

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Leasing Activity” for information regarding rent for leases signed in 2021.

The following table presents scheduled lease expirations of anchor tenants as of December 31, 2021 (includes leases with tenants that have filed for bankruptcy protection, depending on the current status of the lease):

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Leasing Activity” for information regarding rent in leases signed in 2021.

We have one property in our portfolio that is classified as under development, however we do not currently have any activity occurring at this property.

In September 2019, one property that we previously classified as a redevelopment property, Fashion District Philadelphia (formerly The Gallery at Market East), opened. Development work at that property is continuing and is expected to stabilize in 2022.

In December 2018, we entered into a lease for our new office space at One Commerce Square, which is located at 2005 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, with Brandywine Realty Trust. One of our independent trustees is also a Trustee of Brandywine Realty Trust. The lease commenced in December 2019 and we moved into our new offices at One Commerce Square in January 2020. Total rent expense under this lease was $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

In the normal course of business, we have become, and might in the future become, involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operation of our properties and the properties we manage for third parties. In management’s opinion, the resolutions of any such pending legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

On November 1, 2020, we and certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries commenced voluntary cases under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware under the caption In re Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, et al. and filed our prepackaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court. On November 30, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan. The Plan became effective and we subsequently emerged from bankruptcy on December 10, 2020. Refer to Item 1. Business—Recent Developments—Financial Restructuring for a detailed description of these matters.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common shares of beneficial interest are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PEI.”

As of December 31, 2021, there were approximately 1,600 holders of record of our common shares and approximately 19,000 beneficial holders of our common shares.

During the first quarter 2020, we declared a quarterly cash distribution on our common shares of beneficial interest equal to $0.21 per share. In the second quarter 2020, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.02 per common share. We paid no quarterly dividend during the third or fourth quarter 2020. We paid no quarterly dividend during 2021. Our future payment of distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will depend upon numerous factors, including our cash flow, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, and other factors that our Board of Trustees deems relevant. Further, the Company cannot declare and pay cash dividends on common shares while there exists a preferred dividend arrearage, as described below. Other than as may be required to maintain our status as a REIT, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our common or preferred shares for the foreseeable future.

The Credit Agreements provide generally that we may only make dividend payments in the minimum amount necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. We must maintain our status as a REIT at all times.

Class A and Class B Units of PREIT Associates (“OP Units”) are redeemable by PREIT Associates at the election of the limited partner holding the OP Units at the time and for the consideration set forth in PREIT Associates’ partnership agreement. In general, and subject to exceptions and limitations, beginning one year following the respective issue dates, “qualifying parties” may give one or more notices of redemption with respect to all or any part of the Class A Units then held by that party. Class B Units are redeemable at the option of the holder at any time after issuance.

If a notice of redemption is given, we have the right to elect to acquire the OP Units tendered for redemption for our own account, either in exchange for the issuance of a like number of our common shares, subject to adjustments for stock splits, recapitalizations and like events, or a cash payment equal to the average of the closing prices of our shares on the ten consecutive trading days immediately before our receipt, in our capacity as general partner of PREIT Associates, of the notice of redemption. If we decline to exercise this right, then PREIT Associates will pay a cash amount equal to the number of OP Units tendered multiplied by such average closing price.

Dividends on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares are cumulative and therefore will continue to accrue at an annual rate of $1.8436 per share, $1.80 per share and $1.7188 per share, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the cumulative amount of unpaid dividends on our issued and outstanding preferred shares totaled $41.1 million. This consisted of unpaid dividends per share on the Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shares of $2.7654 per share, $2.70 per share and $2.5782 per share, respectively.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

There are 17 operating retail properties in our portfolio that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes. These consolidated properties have a total of 14.6 million square feet, of which we own 11.4 million square feet. The seven operating retail properties that are owned by unconsolidated partnerships with third parties have a total of 5.0 million square feet of which 3.6 million square feet are owned by such partnerships. When we refer to “Same Store” properties, we are referring to properties that have been owned for the full periods presented and exclude properties acquired, disposed of, under redevelopment or designated as a non-core property during the periods presented. Core properties include all operating retail properties except for Exton Square Mall. Valley View Mall was previously designated as a non-core property. As discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, a foreclosure sale judgment was ordered by the court after the property operations were assumed by a receiver on behalf of the lender under the mortgage loan secured by Valley View Mall and we no longer operate the property. “Core Malls” also excludes these properties as well as power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.

We have one property in our portfolio that is classified as under development; however, we do not currently have any activity occurring at this property.

Fashion District Philadelphia opened on September 19, 2019. Fashion District Philadelphia is an aggregation of properties spanning three blocks in downtown Philadelphia that were formerly known as Gallery I, Gallery II and 907 Market Street. Joining Century 21 (which has since closed in 2020) and Burlington in 2019 were multiple dining and entertainment venues including Market Eats, a multi offering food court, City Winery, AMC Theatres, and Round 1 Bowling & Amusement. In addition, Nike Factory Store, Ulta, and H & M have opened Philadelphia flagship stores at the property since its opening in September 2019.

Our primary business is owning and operating retail shopping malls, which we do primarily through our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. (“PREIT Associates” or the “Operating Partnership”). We provide management, leasing and real estate development services through PREIT Services, LLC (“PREIT Services”), which generally develops and manages properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes, and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”), which generally develops and manages properties that we do not consolidate for financial reporting purposes, including properties owned by partnerships in which we own an interest, and properties that are owned by third parties in which we do not have an interest. PRI is a taxable REIT subsidiary, as defined by federal tax laws, which means that it is able to offer additional services to tenants without jeopardizing our continuing qualification as a REIT under federal tax law.

Our revenue consists primarily of fixed rental income, additional rent in the form of expense reimbursements, and percentage rent (rent that is based on a percentage of our tenants’ sales or a percentage of sales in excess of thresholds that are specified in the leases) derived from our income producing properties. We also receive income from our real estate partnership investments and from the management and leasing services PRI provides.

The COVID-19 global pandemic that began in 2020 has adversely impacted and continues to impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results, as well as our tenants’ businesses. The prolonged evolution of the pandemic has also led to periods of unprecedented global economic disruption and volatility in financial markets. Some of our tenants’ financial health and business viability have been adversely impacted and their creditworthiness has deteriorated. We anticipate that our future business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, in 2022 and potentially in future periods, will continue to be materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Uncertainty remains as to how long the global pandemic, economic challenges and various limitations and disruptions to business operations will last. Given these factors, so long as the lingering effects of COVID-19 remain, the virus may continue to impact us or our tenants, or our ability or the ability of our tenants to resume more normal operations.

COVID-19 closures of our properties began on March 12, 2020 and continued through the reopening of our last property on July 3, 2020. These closures impacted most of our properties for the full second quarter of 2020 with traffic and tenant reopenings increasing through the third and fourth quarters of 2020. Although many restrictions have been lifted, numerous limitations remain and it is possible that new or renewed restrictions in the jurisdictions where our properties are located may be implemented in response to evolving conditions. As such, as the pandemic continues, intensifies or experiences resurgences, it is possible that additional closures will occur. During the mall closure period

in the second quarter of 2020, the Company furloughed a significant portion of its property and corporate employee base and later made permanent headcount reductions, which contributed to decreased general and administrative expenses in the third and fourth quarters of 2020.

All of our properties have remained open since the third quarter of 2020 and are employing safety and sanitation measures designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19, with some of our tenants still operating at reduced capacity. Following the pandemic-related closures, approximately 4% of our tenants failed to re-open (inclusive of tenants that filed for bankruptcy protection in the aftermath). As a result of the challenging environment created by COVID-19, primarily beginning in the second quarter of 2020, many of our tenants have sought rent relief and deferral and several have failed to pay rent due. Although we continue to make progress in collecting COVID-19-period rents, we have also initiated legal proceedings against certain tenants for failure to pay. Collections improved in 2021 compared to 2020 and, as of December 31, 2021, we had cash receipts of 92% of billed fourth quarter rents. We believe that our rent collections are probable, but expect that collections will continue to be below our tenants’ rent obligations as long as the effects of COVID-19 affect the financial strength of our tenants. The significance of COVID-19 on our business, however, will continue to depend on, among other things, the extent and duration of the pandemic, the severity of the disease and the number of people infected with the virus, the timing and widespread availability and acceptance of vaccines, the further effects on the economy of the pandemic and of the measures taken by governmental authorities and other third parties restricting daily activities and the length of time that such measures remain in place or are renewed, and implementation of governmental programs to assist businesses and consumers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

We evaluate operating results and allocate resources on a property-by-property basis, and do not distinguish or evaluate our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Due to the nature of our operating properties, which involve retail shopping, we have concluded that our individual properties have similar economic characteristics and meet all other aggregation criteria. Accordingly, we have aggregated our individual properties into one reportable segment. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of our consolidated revenue, and none of our properties are located outside the United States.

We hold our interest in our portfolio of properties through the Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2021, held a 98.7% controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, and consolidated it for reporting purposes. We hold our investments in seven of the 25 operating retail properties and the one development property in our portfolio through unconsolidated partnerships with third parties in which we own a 25% to 50% interest.

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our dispositions and acquisitions in 2021 and 2020.

Conditions in the economy have caused fluctuations and variations in business and consumer confidence, retail sales, and consumer spending on retail goods. Further, traditional mall tenants, including department store anchors and smaller format retail tenants face significant challenges resulting from changing consumer expectations, the convenience of e-commerce shopping, competition from fast fashion retailers, the expansion of outlet centers, and declining mall traffic, among other factors. In recent years, there has been an increased level of tenant bankruptcies and store closings by tenants who have been significantly impacted by these factors. All of these factors have been exacerbated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 and 2020.

The table below sets forth information related to our tenants in bankruptcy for our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (excluding tenants in bankruptcy at sold properties):

(1) Total represents all tenants operating as individual brands that are consolidated under one parent and includes both tenant-owned and landlord-owned stores.

(3) Includes our share of tenant gross rent from partnership properties based on PREIT’s ownership percentage in the respective equity method investments as of December 31, 2021.

In recent years, through property dispositions, proactive store recaptures, lease terminations and other activities, we have made efforts to reduce our risks associated with certain department store concentrations.

During 2019, we re-opened or introduced additional tenants to former anchor positions at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Valley Mall in Hagerstown, Maryland and Plymouth Meeting Mall, in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. Dick’s Sporting Goods at Valley Mall opened in the first quarter of 2020. At Plymouth Meeting Mall, we opened Michaels in the first quarter of 2020. In 2017, we purchased the Macy’s location at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and opened HomeSense, Sierra Trading, Five Below and Michaels between 2018 and the first quarter of 2020. During 2021, we opened Power Warehouse at Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey.

During 2019, an anchor tenant, Sears, closed at Exton Square Mall in Exton, Pennsylvania. In January 2020, the Lord & Taylor store at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey closed and we executed a lease with Turn 7, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2021. Sears closed its stores at Moorestown Mall in Moorestown, New Jersey and Jacksonville Mall in Jacksonville, North Carolina in April 2020. Sears continues to be financially obligated pursuant to the lease at the Jacksonville Mall location. In July 2021, the former Sears site at Moorestown Mall was sold to Cooper University Health Care. In May 2020, J.C. Penney filed for bankruptcy and announced the closure of its stores at the Mall at Prince Georges in Hyattsville, Maryland, and Magnolia Mall in Florence, South Carolina. The Magnolia Mall location has been leased to Tilt Studio, an entertainment concept that opened in October 2021.

In response to anchor store closings and other trends in the retail space, we have been changing the mix of tenants at our properties. We have been reducing the percentage of traditional mall tenants and increasing the share of space dedicated to dining, entertainment, fast fashion, off price, and large format box tenants. This initiative has slowed down due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of these changes may result in the redevelopment of all or a portion of our properties. See “— Capital Improvements, Redevelopment and Development Projects.”

To fund the capital necessary to replace anchors and to maintain a reasonable level of leverage, we expect to use a variety of means available to us, subject to and in accordance with the terms of our Credit Agreements. These steps might include (i) making additional borrowings under our Credit Agreements (assuming availability and continued compliance with the financial covenants thereunder), (ii) obtaining construction loans on specific projects, (iii) selling properties or interests in properties with values in excess of their mortgage loans (if applicable) and applying the excess proceeds to fund capital expenditures or for debt reduction, or (iv) obtaining capital from joint ventures or other partnerships or arrangements involving our contribution of assets with institutional investors, private equity investors or other REITs.

We might engage in various types of capital improvement projects at our operating properties. Such projects vary in cost and complexity, and can include building out new or existing space for individual tenants, upgrading common areas or exterior areas such as parking lots, or redeveloping the entire property, among other projects. Project costs are accumulated in “Construction in progress” on our consolidated balance sheet until the asset is placed into service, and amounted to $45.8 million as of December 31, 2021.

As of December 31, 2021, we had unaccrued contractual and other commitments related to our capital improvement projects and development projects at our consolidated and unconsolidated properties of $4.3 million, including $0.9 million of commitments related to the redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia, in the form of tenant allowances and contracts with general service providers and other professional service providers.

In 2014, we entered into a 50/50 joint venture with The Macerich Company (“Macerich”) to redevelop Fashion District Philadelphia. As we redevelop Fashion District Philadelphia, operating results in the short term, as measured by sales, occupancy, real estate revenue, property operating expenses, Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and depreciation, will continue to be affected until the newly constructed space is completed, leased and occupied.

In January 2018, we and Macerich entered into a $250.0 million term loan (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the

venture previously made by the partners. A total of $51.0 million was drawn during the third quarter of 2019 and we received aggregate distributions of $25.0 million as our share of the draws. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich, the “Partnership Loan”) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to the Macerich lender prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to us and Macerich. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. The Company considered the changes to the governing structure of PM Gallery LP and determined the investment would qualify as a variable interest entity and would continue to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

The FDP Loan Agreement provides for: (i) a maturity date of January 22, 2023, with the potential for a one-year extension upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions, (ii) an interest rate at the borrowers’ option for each advance of either (A) the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%) plus 2.50% or (B) LIBOR for the applicable period plus 3.50%, (iii) a full recourse guarantee of 50% of the borrowers’ obligations by PREIT Associates, L.P., on a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type.

We also own one development property, but we do not expect to make any significant investment at this property in the short term.

Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that might change in subsequent periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Management has also considered events and changes in property, market and economic conditions, estimated future cash flows from property operations and the risk of loss on specific accounts or amounts in determining its estimates and judgments. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may affect comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in a similar business. The estimates and assumptions made by management in applying critical accounting policies have not changed materially during 2021 and 2020, except as otherwise noted, and none of these estimates or assumptions have proven to be materially incorrect or resulted in our recording any significant adjustments relating to prior periods. We will continue to monitor the key factors underlying our estimates and judgments, but no change is currently expected.

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policy that management believes is critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies included in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

If there is a triggering event in relation to a property to be held and used, we will estimate the aggregate future cash flows, less estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges. In addition, this estimate may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or when a range of possible values is estimated.

The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in the anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially affect our net income. To the extent estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the estimated fair value of the property. Our intent is to hold

and operate our properties long-term, which reduces the likelihood that our carrying value is not recoverable. A shortened holding period would increase the likelihood that the carrying value is not recoverable.

Assessment of our ability to recover certain lease related costs must be made when we have a reason to believe that the tenant might not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires us to make estimates as to the recoverability of such costs.

An other-than-temporary impairment of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is recognized when the carrying value of the investment is not considered recoverable based on evaluation of the severity and duration of the decline in value. To the extent impairment has occurred, the excess carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value is recorded as a reduction to income.

We derive over 96% of our revenue from tenant rent and other tenant-related activities. Tenant rent includes base rent, percentage rent, expense reimbursements (such as reimbursements of costs of common area maintenance (“CAM”), real estate taxes and utilities), and the amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles.

We accrue revenue under leases, provided that it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the lease revenue that is due under the terms of the lease both at inception and on an ongoing basis. When collectability of lease revenue is not probable, leases are prospectively accounted for on a cash basis and any difference between the revenue that has been accrued and the cash collected from the tenant over the life of the lease is recognized as a current period adjustment to lease revenue. We review the collectability of our tenant receivables related to tenant rent including base rent, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income by specifically analyzing billed and unbilled revenues, including straight-line rent receivable, and considering historical collection issues, tenant creditworthiness and current economic and industry trends. Our revenue recognition and receivables collectability analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history and financial condition of the payor, the basis for any disputes or negotiations with the payor, and other information that could affect collectability.

Percentage rent represents rental revenue that the tenant pays based on a percentage of its sales, either as a percentage of its total sales or as a percentage of sales over a certain threshold. In the latter case, we do not record percentage rent until the sales threshold has been reached.

Revenue for rent received from tenants prior to their due dates is deferred until the period to which the rent applies.

In addition to base rent, certain lease agreements contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse a fixed or pro rata share of certain CAM costs, real estate taxes and utilities. Tenants generally make monthly expense reimbursement payments based on a budgeted amount determined at the beginning of the year. Effective January 1, 2019, we recognize fixed CAM revenue prospectively on a straight-line basis.

Certain lease agreements contain co-tenancy clauses that can change the amount of rent or the type of rent that tenants are required to pay, or, in some cases, can allow the tenant to terminate their lease, in the event that certain events take place, such as a decline in property occupancy levels below certain defined levels or the vacating of an anchor store. Co-tenancy clauses do not generally have any retroactive effect when they are triggered. The effect of co-tenancy clauses is applied on a prospective basis to recognize the new rent that is in effect.

Payments made to tenants as inducements to enter into a lease are treated as deferred costs that are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the related lease.

Lease termination fee revenue is recognized in the period when a termination agreement is signed, collectability is assured, and the tenant has vacated the space. In the event that a tenant is in bankruptcy when the termination agreement is signed, termination fee income is deferred and recognized when it is received.

We also generate revenue by providing management services to third parties, including property management, brokerage, leasing and development. Management fees generally are a percentage of managed property revenue or cash receipts. Leasing fees are earned upon the consummation of new leases. Development fees are earned over the time period of the development activity and are recognized on the percentage of completion method. These activities are collectively included in “Other income” in the consolidated statements of operations.

Revenue from the reimbursement of marketing expenses is generated through tenant leases that require tenants to reimburse a defined amount of property marketing expenses. Our contractual performance obligations are fulfilled as marketing expenditures are made. Tenant payments are received monthly as required by the respective lease terms. We defer income recognition if the reimbursements exceed the aggregate marketing expenditures made through that date. Deferred marketing reimbursement revenue is recorded in tenants’ deposits and deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheet. The marketing reimbursements are recognized as revenue at the time that the marketing expenditures occur.

Property management revenue from management and development activities is generated through contracts with third party owners of real estate properties or with certain of our joint ventures, and is recorded in other income in the consolidated statements of operations. In the case of management fees, our performance obligations are fulfilled over time as the management services are performed and the associated revenues are recognized on a monthly basis when the customer is billed. In the case of development fees, our performance obligations are fulfilled over time as we perform certain stipulated development activities as set forth in the respective development agreements and the associated revenues are recognized on a monthly basis when the customer is billed.

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for descriptions of new accounting developments.

Our net loss decreased by $130.8 million to a net loss of $135.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from a net loss of $266.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The change in our 2021 results of operations was primarily due to: (a) an increase in lease revenue of $34.9 million; (b) a loss on remeasurement of Fashion District Philadelphia's assets and an other than temporary impairment on our investment in Fashion District Philadelphia totaling $148.5 million, which had an unfavorable impact in 2020; (c) a decrease of $8.4 million in depreciation and amortization; (d) an increase of $6.1 million in gain on debt extinguishment; and (e) a decrease of $3.5 million in reorganization expenses incurred due to our 2020 financial restructuring; partially offset by: (a) an increase in interest expense of $43.7 million driven by higher interest rates on our Credit Agreements and higher overall debt balances; (b) impairment of assets of $9.9 million in 2021; (c) an $8.1 million non-recurring gain on derecognition of property in 2020; and (d) a decrease of $11.3 million in non-recurring gain on sales of real estate.

The tables below set forth certain occupancy statistics for our retail properties in total and our Core Malls as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:

(1) Occupancy for all periods presented includes all tenants irrespective of the term of their agreement.

(2) Combined occupancy is calculated by using occupied GLA for consolidated and unconsolidated properties and dividing by total GLA for consolidated and unconsolidated properties.

(3) Core Malls excludes Exton Square Mall, Valley View Mall, power centers and Gloucester Premium Outlets.

From 2020 to 2021, total occupancy for our retail portfolio, including consolidated and unconsolidated properties (and including all tenants irrespective of the term of their agreement), increased 330 basis points to 90.4%.

From 2020 to 2021, total occupancy for our Core Malls, including consolidated and unconsolidated properties, increased 290 basis points to 93.2%.

The table below sets forth summary leasing activity information with respect to our properties for the year ended December 31, 2021, including anchor and non-anchor space at consolidated and unconsolidated properties:

(1) Initial gross rent renewal spread is computed by comparing the initial rent per square foot in the new lease to the final rent per square foot amount in the expiring lease. For purposes of this computation, the rent amount includes minimum rent, CAM reimbursements, estimated real estate tax reimbursements and marketing charges, but excludes percentage rent. In certain cases, a lower rent amount may be payable for a period of time until specified conditions in the lease are satisfied.

(2) Average renewal spread is computed by comparing the average rent per square foot over the new lease term to the final rent per square foot amount in the expiring lease. For purposes of this computation, the rent amount includes minimum rent and fixed CAM reimbursements, but excludes pro rata CAM reimbursements, estimated real estate tax reimbursements, marketing charges and percentage rent.

(3) These leasing costs are presented as annualized costs per square foot and are spread uniformly over the initial lease term.

(4) Includes 30 leases and 98,177 square feet of GLA with respect to our unconsolidated partnerships. We own a 25% to 50% interest in each of our unconsolidated properties and do not control such properties. Our percentage ownership is not necessarily indicative of the legal and economic implications of our ownership interest. See "—NON-GAAP SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES" for further details on our ownership interests in our unconsolidated properties.

See “Item 2. Properties—Retail Lease Expiration Schedule - Anchors” and “Item 2. Properties—Retail Lease Expiration Schedule – Non-Anchors” for information regarding average minimum rent on expiring leases.

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

The amounts in the preceding table reflect our consolidated properties and our unconsolidated properties. Our unconsolidated properties are presented under the equity method of accounting in the consolidated statements of operations in the line item “Equity in income of partnerships.”

The following table reports the breakdown of real estate revenues based on the terms of the lease contracts for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Real estate revenue increased by $34.9 million, or 13%, in 2021 as compared to 2020, primarily due to:

Property operating expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 1%, in 2021 as compared to 2020, primarily due to:

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $8.4 million, or 7%, in 2021 as compared to 2020, primarily due to:

General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.7 million, or 1%, in 2021 as compared to 2020. We incurred lower professional fees in 2021, which were a direct result of our financial restructuring that took place in 2020. Those lower professional fees were partially offset by higher employee incentive compensation expenses in 2021.

During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we terminated the employment of certain employees and officers. In connection with the departure of those employees and officers, we recorded $0.3 million and $1.2 million of employee separation expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded net insurance recoveries of $0.7 million as a result of recoveries received to repair damages that occurred in 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded net recoveries of approximately $0.6 million. These net recoveries primarily relate to remediation expenses.

Interest expense increased by $43.7 million, or 52%, in 2021 as compared to 2020 due to higher weighted average effective interest rates (6.10% in 2021 compared to 5.58% in 2020) and a higher weighted average debt balance ($2,253.7 million in 2021 compared to $2,236.9 million in 2020). Also included in interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2020 is $2.8 million of expense due to the accelerated reclassification of other comprehensive (loss) income into earnings from our derivatives.

During the second quarter of 2021, we were notified that the full principal balance and accrued interest on our loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act was forgiven. As a result of the forgiveness, we recorded a gain on debt extinguishment of $4.6 million, which is included in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.

As a result of our financial restructuring in 2020, we incurred $0.9 million of lender expenses which were accounted for as a loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended December 31, 2020. Additionally, as a result of the financial restructuring, we accelerated the amortization of a portion of our deferred financing costs under our previously existing credit agreements which resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In August 2020, a court order assigned a receiver to operate Valley View Mall on behalf of the lender of the mortgage loan secured by the property. We no longer operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. As a result, we derecognized the assets associated with Valley View Mall and recognized a gain on derecognition of property of $8.1 million in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded impairment of assets of $9.9 million. We did not record any asset impairments during the year ended December 31, 2020. The assets that incurred impairments and the amount of such impairments are as follows:

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a further discussion of impairment of assets.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred costs of $0.3 million in connection with our efforts to finalize our financial restructuring that were directly attributable to our bankruptcy proceedings.

For the period from November 1, 2020 to December 10, 2020, we incurred costs and fees of $3.8 million in connection with our efforts to effectuate the financial restructuring that were directly attributable to our bankruptcy proceedings, which we classified within reorganization expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

Equity in loss of partnerships decreased by $1.8 million, or 33%, in 2021 as compared to 2020. This decrease was primarily the result of higher real estate revenues across all of our partnership properties due to recovery from COVID-19.

Loss on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee in 2020 is comprised of $145.7 million of our share of the loss on remeasurement on the assets of our joint venture in Fashion District Philadelphia and $2.8 million of other than temporary impairment on the fair value of our non-controlling ownership interest in the joint venture. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

In May 2021, PM Gallery LP, a joint venture entity owned directly by us and The Macerich Company, sold a portion of an asset at Fashion District Philadelphia for $5.3 million. In connection with the sale, a gain of $2.6 million was recognized by the joint venture and we recorded a related gain of $1.3 million at our share of 50%.

In May 2021, we closed on the sale of a parcel of property at Moorestown Mall for $10.1 million. In connection with the sale, we paid a $9.0 million lease termination fee for a portion of the property that was under a lease agreement for net proceeds of $0.8 million. We recorded a loss on sale of real estate of $1.0 million in connection with the sale. In August 2021, we closed on the sale of Valley View Center for $3.5 million, and recorded a loss on sale of real estate of approximately $0.2 million in connection with the transaction.

In January 2020, we completed the sale of an outparcel at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan for total consideration of $5.2 million. In March 2020, we completed the sale of two outparcels at Magnolia Mall in Florence, South Carolina for total consideration of $2.9 million. In connection with the March sale, we recorded a gain of $1.9 million. In June 2020, we completed the sale of six outparcels at Magnolia Mall, Jacksonville Mall and Valley Mall for total consideration of $14.4 million and net gain of $9.3 million. In December 2020, we sold a land outparcel for $0.6 million in consideration. As a result of the sale, we recorded a gain on sale of $0.2 million.

The preceding discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for the periods presented. We also use Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and Funds from Operations (“FFO”) which are non-GAAP financial measures, to supplement our analysis and discussion of our operating performance:

NOI and FFO are commonly used non-GAAP financial measures of operating performance in the real estate industry, and we use them as supplemental non-GAAP measures to compare our performance between different periods and to compare our performance to that of our industry peers. Our computation of NOI, FFO and other non-GAAP financial measures, such as Same Store NOI, Non Same Store NOI, NOI attributable to our share of unconsolidated properties, and FFO, as adjusted, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by our industry peers. None of these measures are measures of performance in accordance with GAAP, and they have limitations as analytical tools. They should not be considered as alternative measures of our net loss, operating performance, cash flow or liquidity. They are not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. Please see below for a discussion of these non-GAAP measures and their respective reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

The non-GAAP financial measures presented below incorporate financial information attributable to our share of unconsolidated properties. This proportionate financial information is non-GAAP financial information, but we believe that it is helpful information because it reflects the pro rata contribution from our unconsolidated properties that are owned through investments accounted for under GAAP using the equity method of accounting. Under such method, earnings from these unconsolidated partnerships are recorded in our statements of operations prepared in accordance with GAAP under the caption entitled “Equity in income of partnerships.”

To derive the proportionate financial information reflected in the tables below as “unconsolidated,” we multiplied the percentage of our economic interest in each partnership on a property-by-property basis by each line item. Under the partnership agreements relating to our current unconsolidated partnerships with third parties, we own a 25% to 50% economic interest in such partnerships, and there are generally no provisions in such partnership agreements relating to special non-pro rata allocations of income or loss, and there are no preferred or priority returns of capital or other similar provisions. While this method approximates our indirect economic interest in our pro rata share of the revenue and expenses of our unconsolidated partnerships, we do not have a direct legal claim to the assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses of the unconsolidated partnerships beyond our rights as an equity owner in the event of any liquidation of such entity. Our percentage ownership is not necessarily indicative of the legal and economic implications of our ownership interest. Accordingly, NOI and FFO results based on our share of the results of unconsolidated partnerships do not represent cash generated from our investments in these partnerships.

We have determined that we hold a noncontrolling interest in each of our unconsolidated partnerships, and account for such partnerships using the equity method of accounting, because:

We hold legal title to a property owned by one of our unconsolidated partnerships through a tenancy in common arrangement. For this property, such legal title is held by us and another entity, and each has an undivided interest in title to the property. With respect to this property, under the applicable agreements between us and the entity with ownership interests, we and such other entity have joint control because decisions regarding matters such as the sale, refinancing, expansion or rehabilitation of the property require the approval of both us and the other entity owning an interest in the property. Hence, we account for this property like our other unconsolidated partnerships using the equity method of accounting. The balance sheet items arising from this property appear under the caption “Investments in partnerships, at equity.”

For further information regarding our unconsolidated partnerships, see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

NOI (a non-GAAP measure) is derived from real estate revenue (determined in accordance with GAAP, including lease termination revenue), minus property operating expenses (determined in accordance with GAAP), plus our pro rata share of revenue and property operating expenses of our unconsolidated partnership investments. NOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our financial performance or to be an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. It is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe NOI is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it is an indicator of the return on property investment, and provides a method of comparing property performance over time. We believe that net loss is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI excludes other income, general and administrative expenses, provision for employee separation expenses, interest expense, depreciation and

amortization, insurance recoveries, gain/loss on debt extinguishment, gain on derecognition of property, impairment of assets, equity in loss/income of partnerships, loss on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee, gain on sale of non operating real estate, gain/loss on sale of real estate, project costs and other expenses and reorganization expenses.

Same Store NOI is calculated using retail properties owned for the full periods presented and excludes properties acquired or disposed of, under redevelopment, or designated as non-core during the periods presented. In 2019, Exton Square Mall and Valley View Mall were designated as non-core and are excluded from Same Store NOI. Non Same Store NOI is calculated using the retail properties excluded from the calculation of Same Store NOI.

The table below reconciles net loss to NOI of our consolidated properties for the years ended 2021 and 2020:

The table below reconciles equity in (loss) income of partnerships to NOI of our share of unconsolidated properties for the years ended 2021 and 2020:

The table below presents total NOI and total NOI excluding lease terminations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Total NOI increased by $41.9 million, or 26.4%, in 2021 as compared to 2020. NOI from Non Same Store properties decreased by $2.9 million. This decrease was primarily due to the operating results at non-core properties. NOI from Same Store properties increased by $44.7 million primarily due to property results as discussed in “—Results of Operations—Real Estate Revenue” and “—Property Operating Expenses.”

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines Funds From Operations (“FFO”), which is a non-GAAP measure commonly used by REITs, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding: (i) depreciation and amortization of real estate, (ii) gains and losses on sales of certain real estate assets, (iii) gains and losses from change in control and (iv) impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. NAREIT’s established guidance provides that excluding impairment write downs of depreciable real estate is consistent with the NAREIT definition.

FFO is a commonly used measure of operating performance and profitability among REITs. We use FFO and FFO per diluted share and unit of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership (“OP Unit”) in measuring our performance against our peers and as one of the performance measures for determining incentive compensation amounts earned under certain of our performance-based executive compensation programs.

FFO does not include gains and losses on sales of operating real estate assets or impairment write downs of depreciable real estate (including development land parcels), which are included in the determination of net loss in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, FFO is not a comprehensive measure of our operating cash flows. In addition, since FFO does not include depreciation on real estate assets, FFO may not be a useful performance measure when comparing our operating performance to that of other non-real estate commercial enterprises. We compensate for these limitations by using FFO in conjunction with other GAAP financial performance measures, such as net loss and net cash used in operating activities, and other non-GAAP financial performance measures, such as NOI. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our financial performance or to be an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that net loss is the most directly comparable GAAP measurement to FFO.

When applicable, we also present FFO, as adjusted, and FFO per diluted share and OP Unit, as adjusted, which are non-GAAP measures, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, to show the effect of such items as gain or loss on debt extinguishment (including accelerated amortization of financing costs), impairment of assets, provision for employee separation expense, insurance recoveries or losses, net, gain on derecognition of property, loss on hedge ineffectiveness and reorganization expenses which had an effect on our results of operations, but are not, in our opinion, indicative of our ongoing operating performance.

We believe that FFO is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it excludes various items included in net loss that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as gains on sales of operating real estate and depreciation and amortization of real estate, among others. We believe that Funds From Operations, as adjusted, is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it adjusts FFO to exclude items that management does not believe are indicative of our operating performance, such as gain or loss on debt extinguishment (including accelerated amortization of financing costs), provision for employee separation expense, insurance recoveries or losses, net, gain on derecognition of property, loss on hedge ineffectiveness and reorganization expenses.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss determined in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit, FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted and FFO attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted per diluted share and OP Unit, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

(1) Does not include the impact of $27.4 million and $13.7 million of accrued, undeclared and unpaid preferred share dividends for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company cannot declare and pay cash dividends on common shares while there exists a preferred dividend arrearage.

FFO was $4.4 million for 2021, an increase of $6.1 million, or 357.2%, compared to a loss of $1.7 million for 2020. This increase was primarily due to:

FFO per diluted share and OP Unit increased $0.08 per share to $0.05 per share for 2021, compared to $(0.02) per share for 2020 due to the factors noted above.

This “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section contains certain “forward-looking statements” that relate to expectations and projections that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our future liquidity and capital resources, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that might cause our actual liquidity and capital resources to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Additional factors that might affect our liquidity and capital resources include those discussed in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements about our liquidity and capital resources to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

We currently expect to meet certain of our short-term liquidity requirements, including operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, generally through our available working capital and our First Lien Revolving Facility, subject to the terms and conditions of our First Lien Credit Agreement. See “Credit Agreements—Similar terms of the Credit Agreements” below for covenant information. We expect to spend approximately $4.3 million related to our capital improvements and development projects in 2022. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to allow us to make any distributions necessary to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our Credit Agreements limit our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common and preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions. We have deferred payments on our preferred shares and suspended payments on our common shares since the third quarter of 2020. Other than as may be required to maintain our status as a REIT, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our common or preferred shares for the foreseeable future.

As a result of the existing cumulative unpaid dividends on our preferred shares and our bankruptcy filing, we are no longer able to register the offer and sale of securities on Form S-3. This creates additional limitations on our ability to raise capital in the capital markets, potentially increasing our costs of raising capital in the future. Our ability to raise capital in the capital markets may also be impacted by market fluctuations more generally, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic downturn.

During 2021, our capital raised includes proceeds of $5.0 million from our share of asset sales by us and our unconsolidated subsidiaries and through our operations, we generated $69.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

We have availability under our revolving facility of $75.5 million as of December 31, 2021. We have been focused on improving operational efficiency and driving stable and increasing cash flows from operations while advancing our portfolio, including by undertaking, with the assistance of outside advisors, a thorough review of our business and capital structure and evaluating a wide range of opportunities to further strengthen our balance sheet and financial flexibility. We are actively seeking to raise additional capital, including through asset dispositions identified through our portfolio property reviews. Disposing of these properties can enable us to redeploy or recycle our capital to other uses. In many cases, we are marketing land parcels for development for a variety of different nontraditional, non-retail uses, including hotel, multifamily residential and healthcare uses, which we believe can also help position our portfolio within differentiated mixed-use environments. During 2021, we executed agreements of sale for five land parcels for anticipated multifamily development and one land parcel for anticipated hotel development that are expected to provide an aggregate of up to approximately $82.5 million in gross proceeds. We also closed on the sale of three properties in 2021. The proceeds from our anticipated property sales will primarily be used to repay amounts outstanding under our Credit Agreements. These agreements include the sale of land parcels for multifamily residential development, the sale of operating outparcels and the sale of land parcels for hotel development. Each of the transactions is subject to numerous closing conditions, including the completion of due diligence and securing of entitlements, which in several cases has been delayed due to the effects of COVID-19 on business operations and availability of financing. Closing of the transactions cannot be assured or the timing of their completion yet estimated with certainty.

The following are some of the factors that could affect our cash flows and require the funding of future cash distributions, recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements or leasing commissions with sources other than operating cash flows:

In addition, we are continuing to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and the related business and travel restrictions and changes to behavior intended to reduce its spread, and its impact on our tenants, their supply chains and customers and the retail industry. Thus far, the pandemic and the actions taken to address it and the related overall worsening of economic conditions have had an adverse effect on our business, operations, liquidity and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2021, all of our malls had re-opened while adhering to social distancing and sanitation and safety protocols designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19, however, many of our tenants continue to operate at reduced capacity. The pandemic’s effect, primarily beginning in the second quarter of 2020, had a significant impact on our operations, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations in 2020 and its impact continued into 2021 and is expected to continue through future periods. Conditions improved in 2021 compared to 2020 and as of December 31, 2021, we had cash receipts of 92% of billed fourth quarter rents. We believe that our rent collections are probable, but expect that collections will continue to be below our tenants’ rent obligations as long as lingering effects of COVID-19, including new or renewed restrictions and business closures, affect the return of customers to malls and the financial strength of our tenants. While we continue to record rental revenue, the reduced collection levels have impacted our liquidity position and may continue to do so. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Properties—The COVID-19 global pandemic and the public health and governmental response have adversely affected, and will likely continue to adversely affect, our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results. The extent and duration of such effects are uncertain, continuously changing and difficult to predict. Additionally, the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results.”

We expect to meet certain of our longer-term requirements, such as obligations to fund redevelopment and development projects, certain capital requirements, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital improvements, through a variety of capital sources, subject to the terms and conditions of our Credit Agreements, as further described below.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which is the authority that regulates LIBOR, announced it would no longer compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. The FCA no longer publishes one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rates and plans to cease publishing all other LIBOR tenors (overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month) on June 30, 2023. It is not presently known whether SOFR or any other alternative reference rates will attain broad market acceptance as replacements of LIBOR. There remains uncertainty as to how the financial services industry will address the discontinuance of LIBOR in financial instruments that are indexed to LIBOR. Further, various financial instruments indexed to LIBOR could experience different outcomes based on their contractual terms, ability to amend those terms, market or product type, legal or regulatory jurisdiction, and other factors. Alternative reference rates that replace LIBOR may not yield the same or similar economic results over the lives of the financial instruments, which could adversely affect the value of and return on these instruments.

We have material contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest on loans or amounts received and paid on derivative instruments. These risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to a new alternative rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans, securities, and derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be affected if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require negotiation with the respective counterparty.

While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2022, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that point. This could occur, for example, if a requisite number of banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate would be accelerated and magnified.

We have entered into two secured credit agreements (collectively, as amended, the “Credit Agreements”): (a) the First Lien Credit Agreement, which, as described in more detail below, includes (i) the $130.0 million First Lien Revolving Facility, and (ii) the $384.5 million First Lien Term Loan Facility, and (b) the Second Lien Credit Agreement, which, as described in more detail below, includes the $535.2 Second Lien Term Loan Facility. The First Lien Term Loan Facility and the Second Lien Term Loan Facility are collectively referred to as the “Term Loans.” The Credit Agreements refinanced our previously existing credit agreements in effect prior to the Effective Date, including our secured term loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020 (as amended, the “Bridge Credit Agreement”), our Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement entered into on January 8, 2014 (as amended, the “7-Year Term Loan”), and our 2018 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement entered into on May 24, 2018 (as amended, the “2018 Credit Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this section and not otherwise defined in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the applicable Credit Agreement.

As of December 31, 2021, we had borrowed $965.7 million under the Term Loans and $54.5 million under the First Lien Revolving Facility. The carrying value of the Term Loans on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 is net of $6.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. The maximum amount that was available to be borrowed by us under the First Lien Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2021 was $75.5 million.

Our obligations under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. Our obligations under the Credit Agreements and the guaranties are secured by mortgages and deeds of trust on a portfolio of 12 of our subsidiaries’ properties, including nine malls and three additional parcels. The obligations are further secured by a lien on substantially all of our personal property pursuant to collateral agreements and a pledge of substantially all of the equity interests held by us and the guarantors, pursuant to pledge agreements, in each case subject to limited exceptions.

The maturity date of the Credit Agreements is December 10, 2022 (or such earlier date that the obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement have been accelerated), unless extended by one year until December 10, 2023 at our option (the “Maturity Date”). Any such extension would be subject to our fulfillment of certain conditions including maintaining minimum liquidity of $35.0 million, a minimum corporate debt yield of 8.0% and a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 105% for the total first lien and second lien loans and letters of credit and the Borrowing Base Properties as determined by an appraisal (provided that we may obtain a second appraisal of each Borrowing Base Property prepared by a nationally recognized appraisal firm and use the highest appraised value), and provided that no default or event of default exists and our representations and warranties are true in all material respects.

On December 10, 2020, we entered into an Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees, for secured loan facilities consisting of: (i) a secured first lien revolving credit facility allowing for borrowings up to $130.0 million, including a sub-facility for letters of credit to be issued thereunder in an aggregate stated amount of up to $10.0 million (collectively, the “First Lien Revolving Facility”), and (ii) a $384.5 million secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Loan Facility”).

Amounts borrowed under the First Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of: (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus (w) for revolving loans, 2.50% per annum, and (x) for term loans, 4.74% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus (y) for revolving loans, 3.50% per annum, and (z) for term loans, 5.74% per annum, in each case, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in cash on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) and on the Maturity Date. We must pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the First Lien Credit Agreement, including an unused fee for the account of the revolving lenders, which will accrue: (i) 0.35% per annum on the daily amount of the unused revolving commitments when that amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments, and (ii) 0.25% when that amount is less than 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments. Accrued and unpaid unused fees will be payable quarterly in arrears during the term of the First Lien Credit Agreement and on the Revolving Termination Date (or any earlier date of termination of the revolving commitments or reduction of the revolving commitments to zero).

Letters of credit and the proceeds of revolving loans may be used: (i) to refinance existing indebtedness under the Bridge Credit Agreement, (ii) for working capital and general corporate purposes (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the First Lien Credit Agreement, including limitations on investments in non-Borrowing Base Properties), and (iii) to fund professional fee payments and other fees and expenses subject to the provisions of the Plan and related confirmation order and for other uses permitted by the provisions of the First Lien Credit Agreement, Plan and confirmation order, in each case consistent with an approved annual business plan. The proceeds of term loans may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan. We may terminate or reduce the amount of the revolving commitments at any time and from time to time without penalty or premium, subject to the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement.

On December 10, 2020, we also entered into a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees for a $535.2 million secured second lien term loan facility (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”).

Amounts borrowed under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of: (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus 7.00% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in kind on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) by adding the accrued and unpaid amount thereof to the principal balance of the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement and then accruing interest on the increased principal amount (provided that after the discharge of our Senior Debt Obligations, interest will be paid in cash). We must pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

The proceeds of loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan.

On February 8, 2021, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided for elimination of approximately $5.3 million of the disputed default interest that was capitalized into the principal balance of the Second Lien Term Loan Facility, reducing the outstanding principal amount of loans outstanding under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, retroactively as of December 10, 2020, to $535.2 million. The First Amendment also eliminated the disputed PIK interest that was capitalized through the date of the amendment.

Each of the Credit Agreements contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and other provisions, which substantially align with those contained in the other Credit Agreements, and which are described in detail below.

Each of the Credit Agreements contains, among other restrictions, certain affirmative and negative covenants, including, without limitation, requirements that we:

Each of the Credit Agreements also limits our ability, subject to certain exceptions, to make certain restricted payments (including payments of dividends and voluntary prepayments of certain indebtedness which includes, with respect to the First Lien Credit Agreement, voluntary prepayments under the Second Lien Credit Agreement), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all our assets or the equity interests of our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. We are also prohibited from selling certain properties unless certain conditions are satisfied with respect to the terms of the sale agreement for such property or, in the case of Borrowing Base Properties, payment of certain release prices.

The First Lien Credit Agreement and, after our Senior Debt Obligations are discharged, the Second Lien Credit Agreement, each prohibit us from: (i) entering into Major Leases, (ii) assigning leases, (iii) discounting any rent under leases where the leased premises is at least 7,500 square feet at a Borrowing Base Property and the discounted amount is more than $750,000 and more than 25% of the aggregate contractual base rent payable over the initial term (not including any extension options), (iv) collecting rent in advance, (v) terminating or modifying the terms of any Major Lease or releasing or discharging tenants from any obligations thereunder, (vi) consenting to a tenant’s assignment or subletting of a Major Lease, or (vii) subordinating any lease to any other deed of trust, mortgage, deed to secure debt or encumbrance, other than the mortgages already encumbering the applicable Borrowing Base Property and the mortgages entered into in connection with the other Credit Agreement. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement and, under the Second Lien Credit Agreement after the First Lien Termination Date, any amounts equal to or greater than $2.5 million but less than $3.5 million received by or on behalf of a guarantor in consideration of any

termination or modification of a lease (or the release or discharge of a tenant) are subject to restrictions on use, and such amounts that are equal to or greater than $3.5 million must be applied to reduce our outstanding obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all terms under the Credit Agreements.

Subject to certain conditions, we may prepay loans under the First Lien Credit Agreement, and under the Second Lien Credit Agreement after the First Lien Termination Date, without premium or penalty. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, if at any time the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding revolving loans, together with the aggregate amount of all letter of credit liabilities, exceeds the aggregate amount of the revolving commitments, we must make a payment of that excess amount. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, at any time, and under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, at any time after the First Lien Termination Date, if we receive net cash proceeds from certain capital events, subject to certain exceptions, we must prepay loans under the applicable Credit Agreement (and under the First Lien Credit Agreement, we must either prepay loans or cash collateralize the letter of credit liabilities or specified derivatives obligations, as applicable) as follows:

In the event of certain non-guarantor prepayment events resulting in the receipt of net cash proceeds by a borrower or guarantor from our non-guarantor subsidiaries or joint ventures, those amounts are required to prepay loans (and under the First Lien Credit Agreement, prepay loans or be used to cash collateralize the letter of credit liabilities or specified derivatives obligations, as applicable) as follows (subject to certain exceptions): (a) 100% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes a debt issuance, (b) 50% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an equity issuance, (c) 100% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an insurance condemnation event, and (d) 70% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an asset disposition, provided, in each case (subject to certain exceptions), that the net cash proceeds received and not otherwise required to prepay loans must either prepay loans (under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the revolving loans) or be deposited into a designated collateral proceeds account.

In the event we receive net cash proceeds from an asset disposition of all or any portion of a Borrowing Base Property in accordance with the terms of the applicable Credit Agreement (each of which allows for the release of certain properties from the liens created by the security documents applicable thereto upon our request and subject to our satisfaction of certain specified conditions with respect to such property), such net proceeds must prepay the loans as follows (subject to certain exceptions):

Under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, any net cash proceeds applied to the obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement or to cash collateralize certain letter of credit liabilities or specified derivatives obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement or deposited into the designated collateral proceeds account will reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, any net cash proceeds required to be applied as a principal prepayment of the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement. In the event net cash proceeds are applied under the First Lien Credit Agreement resulting in its termination and the automatic release of the security interest in the collateral thereunder, to the extent any excess net cash proceeds remain, 100% of such remaining proceeds are required to be applied to the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

revolving loans at any time. Under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, amounts in the designated collateral proceeds account in accordance with the First Lien Credit Agreement are held by the administrative agent as additional collateral securing our obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, we have pledged and granted to the administrative agent an additional security interest in a letter of credit collateral account.

Additionally, under the First Lien Credit Agreement, in the event our senior debt yield is less than 12.06% for the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2021 or any calendar quarter thereafter, concurrently with the delivery of a compliance certificate and thereafter once per calendar month until the ratio is equal to or greater than 12.06% for a subsequent quarter (as shown in a compliance certificate), we must either make prepayments, or deposits into a cash collateral account, of all excess cash flow generated during the month preceding such required deposit date. So long as no default or event of default exists, in the event the excess cash flow for any given month is negative and would cause our liquidity to fall below $12.5 million (provided that we deliver evidence of the operating shortfall deficiency to the administrative agent), we may request a disbursement of funds on deposit in the cash collateral account to fund or reimburse us for such deficiency. We may also request disbursement of the funds in the cash collateral account following the termination of a cash sweep period, subject to certain conditions.

Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, if at any time, and under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, if at any time after the First Lien Termination Date, our unrestricted cash or cash equivalents exceed $40.0 million for five consecutive days, we must make prepayments of the amount in excess of $40.0 million. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, those prepayments will be applied first to the revolving loans until the principal balance is reduced to zero, then to the term loans.

In addition to customary events of default including, among other things, non-payment or non-performance under each of the Credit Agreements, events of default include: our (i) failure to pay Material Indebtedness (defined as indebtedness with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $25.0 million or more, or $250.0 million in the case of Nonrecourse Indebtedness), and (ii) the acceleration of such Material Indebtedness (or the occurrence of any event that would permit the holders of such Material Indebtedness to accelerate such Material Indebtedness), in each case, provided that no event of default will result from a default, event of default, acceleration or other action in connection with a guaranty by a loan party of indebtedness secured by a mortgage on a non-Borrowing Base Property until the earliest to occur of (x) commencement of a related court proceeding, (y) in the event such loan party has agreed that an event permitting acceleration of the guaranty has occurred, 45 days following the expiration or termination of a related forbearance agreement, subject to certain conditions, or (z) such loan party makes or agrees to make a payment in satisfaction of any claim made on the guaranty in connection with the event of default, acceleration or other action. The First Lien Credit Agreement also provides that the non-subordination of second priority liens is an event of default.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default (except with respect to bankruptcy as described in the next sentence), the lenders may declare all of the obligations in connection with the applicable Credit Agreement (including an amount equal to the outstanding letters of credit under the First Lien Credit Agreement) immediately due and payable and may terminate the lenders’ commitments thereunder (including the obligation of the issuing banks to issue letters of credit under the First Lien Credit Agreement). Upon the occurrence of a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding, all outstanding amounts (including an amount equal to the outstanding letters of credit under the First Lien Credit Agreement) would automatically become immediately due and payable and the lenders’ commitments under the applicable Credit Agreement (including the obligation of the issuing banks to issue letters of credit under the First Lien Credit Agreement) would automatically terminate. The First Lien Credit Agreement also provides certain specified derivatives providers with specific remedies with respect to specified derivatives contracts thereunder.

As described in Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements, PM Gallery LP, a Delaware limited partnership and joint venture entity owned indirectly by us and The Macerich Company (“Macerich”), previously entered into a $250.0 million term loan in January 2018 (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (the “FDP Loan Agreement”). In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich (the "Partnership Loan")) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million (the "FDP Term Loan”). The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to the Macerich lender prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to us and Macerich. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions.

a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type. As noted above, PREIT Associates L.P. has severally guaranteed its 50% share of the FDP Term Loan (see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements), which had $194.6 million outstanding as of December 31, 2021 (our share of which is $97.3 million). The joint venture also has the outstanding Partnership Loan of $115.5 million outstanding as of December 31, 2021 (our share of which is $57.8 million) and the proceeds of which were used to pay down the FDP Term Loan in December 2020. We monitor the joint venture's cash flow and its ability to meet its debt service requirements. If the joint venture were unable to satisfy its obligations under the FDP Term Loan, and we were required to satisfy the payment obligations under the guarantee, this could have a material impact on our liquidity and available capital resources. There are also circumstances in which a default of the FDP Term Loan could give rise to an event of default under our Credit Agreements. See Item 1A. Risk Factors "RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDEBTEDNESS AND FINANCING - We have determined that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern."

We have 3,450,000 7.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series B Preferred Shares”) outstanding, 6,900,000 7.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”) outstanding and 5,000,000 6.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) outstanding. Upon 30 days’ notice, we may redeem any or all of the Series B Preferred Shares or Series C Preferred Shares at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. We may not redeem the Series D Preferred Shares before September 15, 2022 except to preserve our status as a REIT or upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in the Trust Agreement addendums designating the Series D Preferred Shares, respectively. On and after September 15, 2022, we may redeem any or all of the Series D Preferred Shares, respectively, at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. In addition, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, we may redeem any or all of the Series D Preferred Shares for cash within 120 days after the first date on which such Change of Control occurred at $25.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series B Preferred Shares, the Series C Preferred Shares and the Series D Preferred Shares have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless we redeem or otherwise repurchase them or they are converted.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we executed forbearance and loan modification agreements for our consolidated properties Francis Scott Key Mall, Viewmont Mall, and Woodland Mall. These arrangements allowed us to defer principal payments, and in some cases interest as well. Certain of these forbearance and loan modification agreements also impose certain additional informational reporting requirements during the applicable modification periods.

Our mortgage loans, which are secured by nine of our consolidated properties, are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2025. Our nine properties include Valley View Mall, which was assigned to a receiver in the third quarter 2020. Although we have not yet conveyed Valley View Mall because foreclosure proceedings are ongoing, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. The mortgage principal balance of Valley View Mall was $27.2 million at December 31, 2021, which we will continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is completed. Six of these mortgage loans bear interest at fixed interest rates that range from 3.28% to 5.95% and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.09% at December 31, 2021. Three of our mortgage loans bear interest at variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.72% at December 31, 2021. The weighted average interest rate of all consolidated mortgage loans was 3.98% at December 31, 2021. Mortgage loans for properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships are accounted for in “Investments in partnerships, at equity” and “Distributions in excess of partnership investments,” and are not included in the table below.

The following table outlines the timing of principal payments and balloon payments pursuant to the terms of our mortgage loans on our consolidated properties as of December 31, 2021:

The following table presents our consolidated aggregate contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021 for the periods presented:

For derivatives that have been designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” and subsequently reclassified into “Interest expense, net” in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Through December 10, 2020, all of our derivatives were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

On December 10, 2020 as a result of the Financial Restructuring, we de-designated seven of our interest rate swaps which were previously designated cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan, as the hedged forecasted transactions were no longer probable to occur during the hedged time period due to the financial restructuring as described in Note 1. As such, the Company accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings which resulted in a loss of $2.8 million that was recorded within interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on December 10, 2020, the Company voluntarily de-designated the remaining 13 interest rate swaps that were also previously designated as cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan. Upon de-designation, the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balance of each of these de-designated derivatives will be separately reclassified to earnings as the originally hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Through December 10, 2020, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets.

On December 22, 2020, we re-designated nine interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $375.0 million as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk against the First Lien Term Loan Facility. These interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment with changes in the fair value of the derivatives recorded through accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.

As of December 31, 2021, we had seven total derivatives with a notional amount of $300.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges.

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are also used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For the eleven remaining interest rate swaps that were not re-designated subsequent to December 10, 2020 and matured during 2021, changes in the fair value of derivatives were recorded directly in earnings as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

As of December 31, 2021, the fair value of derivatives in a liability position, which excludes accrued interest but includes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements, was $8.4 million. If we had breached any of the default provisions in these agreements as of December 31, 2021, we might have been required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their termination value (including accrued interest) of $9.4 million. We had not breached any of these provisions as of December 31, 2021.

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $69.0 million for 2021, compared to $5.9 million for 2020.

This increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital between periods primarily as a result of strong collection efforts of our outstanding accounts receivable during the year ended December 31, 2021, which are included in change in other assets in our statement of cash flows.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $21.7 million for 2021, compared to $77.3 million for 2020.

Cash flows used in investing activities in 2021 included investment in construction in progress of $8.2 million, investments in partnerships of $1.7 million and real estate improvements of $16.5 million (primarily related to capital improvements at our properties, including tenant allowances), partially offset by proceeds from sales of real estate of $5.0 million.

Investing activities in 2020 included investment in construction in progress of $22.8 million, investments in partnerships of $34.3 million (primarily at Fashion District Philadelphia) and real estate improvements of $37.8 million (primarily related to capital improvements at our properties, including tenant allowances), partially offset by $22.5 million of proceeds from land and outparcel sales.

Cash flows used in financing activities were $40.4 million for 2021, compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of $103.1 million for 2020.

Cash flows used in financing activities for 2021 included repayments of mortgage loans of $135.1 million, principal installments on mortgage loans of $25.5 million and deferred financing costs of $1.1 million, repayments of first lien term loan by $4.7 million, offset by $127.7 million of proceeds from mortgage loans.

Cash flows provided by financing activities for 2020 included payments of aggregate dividends and distributions of $32.3 million, principal installments on mortgage loans of $16.1 million and deferred financing costs of $14.1 million, offset by $162.4 million of net new borrowings under our revolving facility and term loans.

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for details regarding costs capitalized during 2021 and 2020.

As of December 31, 2021, we had unaccrued contractual and other commitments related to our capital improvement projects and development projects of $4.3 million in the form of tenant allowances, lease termination fees, and contracts with general service providers and other professional service providers. In addition, our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, has jointly and severally guaranteed the obligations of the joint venture we formed with Macerich to develop Fashion District Philadelphia to commence and complete a comprehensive redevelopment of that property costing not less than $300.0 million within 48 months after commencement of construction, which was March 14, 2016. We have satisfied this obligation.

We are aware of certain environmental matters at some of our properties. We have, in the past, performed remediation of such environmental matters, and we are not aware of any significant remaining potential liability relating to these environmental matters or of any obligation to satisfy requirements for further remediation. We may be required in the future to perform testing relating to these matters. We have insurance coverage for certain environmental claims up to $10.0 million per occurrence and up to $10.0 million in the aggregate over our two year policy term. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We might incur costs to comply with environmental laws, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.”

The existence or development of competing retail properties and the related increased competition for tenants might, subject to the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreements, require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would have deferred or would not have otherwise planned to make and might also affect the total sales, occupancy and net operating income of such properties. Any such capital improvements, undertaken individually or collectively, would involve costs and expenses that could adversely affect our results of operations.

When we seek to make acquisitions, competitors (such as institutional investors, other REITs and other owner-operators of retail properties) might drive up the price we must pay for properties, parcels, other assets or other companies or might themselves succeed in acquiring those properties, parcels, assets or companies. In addition, our potential acquisition targets might find our competitors to be more attractive suitors if they have greater resources, are willing to pay more, or have a more compatible operating philosophy. We might not succeed in acquiring retail properties or development sites that we seek, or, if we pay a higher price for a property and/or generate lower cash flow from an acquired property than we expect, our investment returns will be reduced, which will adversely affect the value of our securities.

We receive a substantial portion of our operating income as rent under leases with tenants. At any time, any tenant having space in one or more of our properties could experience a downturn in its business that might weaken its financial condition. Such tenants might enter into or renew leases with relatively shorter terms. Such tenants might also defer or fail to make rental payments when due, delay or defer lease commencement, voluntarily vacate the premises or declare bankruptcy, which could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease or preclude the collection of rent in connection with the space for a period of time, and could result in material losses to us and harm to our results of operations. Also, it might take time to terminate leases of underperforming or nonperforming tenants and we might incur costs to remove such tenants. Some of our tenants occupy stores at multiple locations in our portfolio, and so the effect of any bankruptcy or store closings of those tenants might be more significant to us than the bankruptcy or store closings of other tenants. See “Item 2. Properties—Major Tenants.” In addition, under many of our leases, our tenants pay rent based, in whole or in part, on a percentage of their sales. Accordingly, declines in these tenants’ sales directly affect our results of operations. Also, if tenants are unable to comply with the terms of their leases, or otherwise seek changes to the terms, including changes to the amount of rent, we might modify lease terms in ways that are less favorable to us. Given current conditions in the economy, certain industries and the capital markets, in some instances retailers that have sought protection from creditors under bankruptcy law have had difficulty in obtaining debtor-in-possession financing, which has decreased the likelihood that such retailers will emerge from bankruptcy protection and has limited their alternatives. All of these factors have been exacerbated by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.

There is seasonality in the retail real estate industry. Retail property leases often provide for the payment of all or a portion of rent based on a percentage of a tenant’s sales revenue, or sales revenue over certain levels. Income from such rent is recorded only after the minimum sales levels have been met. The sales levels are often met in the fourth quarter, during the November/December holiday season. Also, many new and temporary leases are entered into later in the year in anticipation of the holiday season and a higher number of tenants vacate their space early in the year. As a result, our occupancy and cash flows are generally higher in the fourth quarter and lower in the first and second quarters. Our concentration in the retail sector increases our exposure to seasonality and has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in a greater percentage of our cash flows being received in the fourth quarter.

Inflation can have many effects on financial performance. Retail property leases often provide for the payment of rent based on a percentage of sales, which might increase with inflation. Customers might spend less at our retailers, which might decrease our rent based on a percentage of sales, because of inflation. Leases might also provide for tenants to bear all or a portion of operating expenses, which might reduce the impact of such increases on us. However, rent increases might not keep up with inflation, or if we recover a smaller proportion of property operating expenses, we might bear more costs if such expenses increase because of inflation.

The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates. As of December 31, 2021, our consolidated debt portfolio consisted of $852.5 million of fixed and variable rate mortgage loans (net of debt issuance costs), $54.5 million outstanding under our First Lien Revolver, which bore interest at a rate of 4.0%, $379.4 million borrowed under our First Lien Term Loan Facility, which bore interest at a rate of 6.24%, and $586.3 million borrowed under our Second Lien Term Loan Facility, which bore interest at a rate of 8.5%.

Our mortgage loans, which are secured by nine of our consolidated properties, are due in installments over various terms extending to October 2025. Our nine properties include Valley View Mall, which was assigned to a receiver in the third quarter 2020. Although we have not yet conveyed Valley View Mall because foreclosure proceedings are ongoing, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. The mortgage principal balance of Valley View Mall was $27.2 million at December 31, 2021, which we will continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is completed. Six of our mortgage loans bear interest at fixed interest rates that range from 3.88% to 5.95%, and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.09% at December 31, 2021. Three of our mortgage loans bear interest at variable rates, a portion of which has been swapped to fixed rates, and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.72% at December 31, 2021. The weighted average interest rate of all consolidated mortgage loans was 3.98% at December 31, 2020. Mortgage loans for properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships are accounted for in “Investments in partnerships, at equity” and “Distributions in excess of partnership investments” on the consolidated balance sheets and are not included in the table below.

Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts of the expected annual maturities due in the respective years and the weighted average interest rates for the principal payments in the specified periods:

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had $1,082.7 million and $1,235.2 million, respectively, of variable rate debt. To manage interest rate risk and limit overall interest cost, we may employ interest rate swaps, options, forwards, caps and floors, or a combination thereof, depending on the underlying exposure. Interest rate differentials that arise under swap contracts are recognized in interest expense over the life of the contracts. If interest rates rise, the resulting cost of funds is expected to be lower than that which would have been available if debt with matching characteristics was issued directly. Conversely, if interest rates fall, the resulting costs would be expected to be, and in some cases have been, higher. We may also employ forwards or purchased options to hedge qualifying anticipated transactions. Gains and losses are deferred and recognized in net loss in the same period that the underlying transaction occurs, expires or is otherwise terminated. See Note 6 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

As of December 31, 2021, we had interest rate swap agreements outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.70% on a notional amount of $300.0 million, maturing on various dates through May 2023. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Interest Rate Derivative Agreements for a discussion of changes to the designation of certain of our interest rate swap agreements in 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, we had interest rate swap agreements outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.13% on a notional amount of $794.0 million, maturing on various dates through May 2023.

Changes in market interest rates have different effects on the fixed and variable rate portions of our debt portfolio. A change in market interest rates applicable to the fixed portion of the debt portfolio affects the fair value, but it has no effect on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in market interest rates applicable to the variable portion of the debt portfolio affects the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not affect the fair value. The following sensitivity analysis related to our debt portfolio, which includes the effects of our interest rate swap agreements, assumes an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates from their actual December 31, 2021 levels, with all other variables held constant.

A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in our net financial instrument position of $31.8 million at December 31, 2021. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an increase in our net financial instrument

position of $23.2 million at December 31, 2021. Based on the variable rate debt included in our debt portfolio at December 31, 2020, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have resulted in an additional $4.8 million in interest expense annually. A 100 basis point decrease would have reduced interest incurred by $4.8 million annually.

A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in our net financial instrument position of $37.5 million at December 31, 2020. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an increase in our net financial instrument position of $25.9 million at December 31, 2020. Based on the variable rate debt included in our debt portfolio at December 31, 2021, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have resulted in an additional $4.4 million in interest expense annually. A 100 basis point decrease would have reduced interest incurred by $4.4 million annually.

Because the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2021, it does not consider changes, exposures or positions which have arisen or could arise after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss or expense with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at the time and interest rates.

Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the notes thereto, our report on internal control over financial reporting, the reports of our independent registered public accounting firm thereon, our summary of unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the financial statement schedule begin on page F-1 of this report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

We are committed to providing accurate and timely disclosure in satisfaction of our SEC reporting obligations. In 2002, we established a Disclosure Committee to formalize our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that:

Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), have reviewed the design and operating effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2021 and, based on this evaluation, have concluded that due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021. As a result, management performed additional procedures prior to filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“Form 10-K”). Based on these and other procedures, management believes that our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K have been prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our CEO and CFO have certified that, based on such officer’s knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-K, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-K, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, we have developed a remediation plan that is described below.

Management of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (“us” or the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Trustees, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions and the dispositions of assets of the Company;

(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and trustees; and

(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, management has conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as of December 31, 2021. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on our assessment, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2021, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, because of the material weaknesses described below.

We identified deficiencies in the design or operating effectiveness of certain management review controls. These deficiencies related to: (i) identifying and assessing risks of misstatement to ensure management review controls are designed, implemented, and operating at a level to effectively respond to those risks, (ii) monitoring the consistent operation of internal control over financial reporting and remediation of known control deficiencies, and (iii) evaluating the reliability of information used in management review controls. The deficiencies contributed to ineffective process-level control activities and the potential for there to have been material accounting errors in our financial statements, account balances or disclosures.

While the control deficiencies described above did not result in an adjustment to our consolidated financial statements, they created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Therefore, we concluded that the deficiencies represent material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2021.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP’s report appears on page F-3 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management of the Company and the Board of Trustees are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and to making further progress in its remediation efforts during 2022. During 2021, we undertook activities aimed at the remediation of the material weakness identified as of December 31, 2020. While our remediation activities in 2021 did result in attracting and retaining sufficient personnel with requisite financial expertise and appropriately considering risks of fraud, including the possibility of management override of controls and proper segregation of duties, our remediation activities remain ongoing. The Company took the following steps in 2021 toward remediation of the material weakness discussed in the prior year:

Management believes that its ongoing remediation efforts to design, implement, and enhance precision of management review controls and ensure reliability of information used in the controls will reduce the risk that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We will monitor and evaluate the remediation steps to ensure our internal control over financial reporting is effective to address control deficiencies or as we determine it necessary to modify the remediation plan described above. We will continue to report regularly to our Audit Committee on the progress of our remediation plan.

As defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes to our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, other than the identification of the material weaknesses noted above, no such changes to our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2021.

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, and thus we have omitted such information in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required or because the required information is reported in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this form

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. and Joseph F. Coradino, or either of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agents, and either of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agents, or either of them or any substitute therefore, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

To the Shareholders and the Board of Trustees Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 15, 2022 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has identified that the borrower under the FDP Loan Agreement will be unable to satisfy the related debt covenants within the next one year period and that the Company would be unable to fulfill its obligation under its related guarantee that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, net investments in real estate, including operating properties, was $1.8 billion at December 31, 2021. The Company performs impairment testing of its investments in real estate and related intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If there is a triggering event in relation to an operating property to be held and used, the Company will estimate the aggregate future cash flows, net of estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges.

We identified the assessment of the Company’s expected holding period for operating properties that experienced a triggering event as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to assess the relevant events or changes in circumstances that the Company used to evaluate its expected holding period. A shortened holding period assumption would increase the risk that the carrying value is not recoverable.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls over the Company’s property impairment process, including a control over the Company’s evaluation of the expected holding period. We evaluated the relevant events or changes in circumstances and the current economic environment that the Company used to evaluate its expected holding period by:

To the Shareholders and the Board of Trustees Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust:

We have audited Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 15, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses related to identifying and assessing risks of misstatement to ensure management review controls are designed, implemented, and operating at a level to effectively respond to those risks, monitoring the consistent operation of internal control over financial reporting and remediation of known control deficiencies, and evaluating the reliability of information used in management review controls have been identified and included in management’s assessment. The material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2021 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or

(1) The Company had net losses used to calculate earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Therefore, the effects of common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for these periods because they would be anti-dilutive.

1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (“PREIT” or the “Company”), a Pennsylvania business trust founded in 1960 and one of the first equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) in the United States, has a primary investment focus on retail shopping malls located in the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region. As of December 31, 2021, our portfolio consists of a total of 25 properties operating in nine states, including 20 shopping malls, four other retail properties and one development property. The property in our portfolio that is classified as under development does not currently have any activity occurring.

We hold our interest in our portfolio of properties through our operating partnership, PREIT Associates, L.P. (“PREIT Associates” or the “Operating Partnership”). We are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2021, we held a 98.7% controlling interest in the Operating Partnership and consolidated it for reporting purposes. The presentation of consolidated financial statements does not itself imply that the assets of any consolidated entity (including any special-purpose entity formed for a particular project) are available to pay the liabilities of any other consolidated entity, or that the liabilities of any consolidated entity (including any special-purpose entity formed for a particular project) are obligations of any other consolidated entity.

Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, each of the limited partners has the right to redeem such partner’s units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) for cash or, at our election, we may acquire such OP Units in exchange for our common shares on a one-for-one basis, in some cases beginning one year following the respective issue date of the OP Units, and in other cases immediately. If all of the outstanding OP Units held by limited partners had been redeemed for cash as of December 31, 2021, the total amount that would have been distributed would have been $1.1 million, which is calculated using our December 31, 2021 closing share price on the New York Stock Exchange of $1.02 multiplied by the number of outstanding OP Units held by limited partners, which was 1,030,510 as of December 31, 2021. The current terms of our credit agreements prohibit the Company from acquiring whole share OP Units for cash and, as such, any whole share OP Units presented for redemption will be redeemed for shares. Partial share OP Unit redemptions will be redeemed for cash.

We provide management, leasing and real estate development services through two of our subsidiaries: PREIT Services, LLC (“PREIT Services”), which generally develops and manages properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes, and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”), which generally develops and manages properties that we do not consolidate for financial reporting purposes, including properties owned by partnerships in which we own an interest, and properties that are owned by third parties in which we do not have an interest. PREIT Services and PRI are consolidated. PRI is a taxable REIT subsidiary, as defined by federal tax laws, which means that it is able to offer an expanded menu of services to tenants without jeopardizing our continuing qualification as a REIT under federal tax law.

We evaluate operating results and allocate resources on a property-by-property basis, and do not distinguish or evaluate our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Due to the nature of our operating properties, which involve retail shopping, we have concluded that our individual properties have similar economic characteristics and meet all other aggregation criteria. Accordingly, we have aggregated our individual properties into one reportable segment. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of consolidated revenue, and none of our properties are located outside the United States.

Consolidation

We consolidate our accounts and the accounts of the Operating Partnership and other controlled subsidiaries, and we reflect the remaining interest in such entities as noncontrolling interest. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Operating Partnership meets the criteria as a variable interest entity. The Company’s significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership, and consequently, substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities represent those assets and liabilities of the Operating Partnership. All of the Company’s debt is also an obligation of the Operating Partnership.

Going Concern Considerations

Under the accounting guidance related to the presentation of financial statements, when preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, management has the responsibility to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments

F-11

that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As a result of the considerations articulated below, we believe there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.

In applying the accounting guidance, management considered our current financial condition and liquidity sources, including current funds available, forecasted future cash flows and our conditional and unconditional obligations due over the next twelve months. Management specifically considered Fashion District Philadelphia’s Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (“FDP Loan Agreement”), which includes a quarterly covenant provision, maturing in January 2023 as an event or condition that raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

However, our ability to satisfy obligations under the FDP Loan Agreement depends primarily on management’s ability to obtain relief from the joint venture’s lender in regard to the Company’s guarantee of 50% of the outstanding debt balance. Obtaining relief from the FDP Loan Agreement lender involves performance by third parties and therefore cannot be considered probable of occurring

Therefore, due to the inherent risks, unknown results and significant uncertainties associated with this matter and the direct correlation to our ability to satisfy our financial obligations that may arise over the applicable twelve month period, we are unable to conclude that it is probable that we will be able to meet our obligations arising within twelve months of the date of issuance of these financial statements under the parameters set forth in this accounting guidance.

Financial Restructuring

On October 7, 2020, the Company and certain of the Company’s wholly owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company Parties”) entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the “RSA”), which contemplated agreed-upon terms for a financial restructuring of the then-existing debt and certain other obligations of the Company Parties (collectively with the following events, the “Financial Restructuring”). The RSA was amended on October 16, 2020, and again on October 23, 2020, to, among other things, extend the date by which the Company Parties were required to commence the solicitation of votes on their joint prepackaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) and, thereafter, the voluntary chapter 11 cases. On November 1, 2020, the Company and the other Company Parties under the RSA (the “Debtors”) filed their respective voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”), commencing the chapter 11 cases to confirm and consummate the Plan in order to effectuate the Debtors’ financial restructuring. The Debtors’ chapter 11 cases were jointly administered for procedural convenience under the caption In re Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, et al., Case No. 20-12737 (KBO). Under the Plan, the Debtors would be recapitalized and their debt maturities extended. The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. On November 30, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”), confirming the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of Its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries (with Additional Technical Modifications As of November 20, 2020) (the “Confirmed Plan”). On December 10, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), each condition precedent to consummation of the Confirmed Plan, enumerated in Section 8.2 thereof, was satisfied or waived in accordance with the Confirmed Plan and the Confirmation Order, and therefore the Effective Date occurred and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy. On the Effective Date, the Company entered into the credit agreements, which are described in Note 4.

COVID-19 Related Risks and Uncertainties

The COVID-19 global pandemic that began in 2020 has adversely impacted and continues to impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results, as well as our tenants’ businesses. The prolonged evolution of the pandemic has also led to periods of unprecedented global economic disruption and volatility in financial markets. Some of our tenants’ financial health and business viability have been adversely impacted and their creditworthiness has deteriorated. We anticipate that our future business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including in 2022 and potentially in future periods, will continue to be materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Uncertainty remains as to how long the global pandemic, economic challenges and various limitations and disruptions to business operations

F-12

will last. Given these factors, so long as the lingering effects of COVID-19 remain, the virus may continue to impact us or our tenants, or our ability or the ability of our tenants to resume more normal operations.

All of our properties have remained open since July 3, 2020 and are employing safety and sanitation measures designed to address the risks posed by COVID-19. Despite the increased vaccination rates in the country, some of our tenants are still operating at reduced capacity. The significance of COVID-19 on our business, however, will continue to depend on, among other things, the extent and duration of the pandemic, the severity of the disease and the number of people infected with the virus, and certain variants thereof, vaccination rates in regions in which our properties are located, further effects on the economy of the pandemic and of the measures taken by governmental authorities and other third parties restricting daily activities and the length of time that such measures remain in place or are renewed, implementation of governmental programs to assist businesses and consumers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effect of any changes to current restrictions or recommended protocols, all of which could vary by geographic region in which our properties are located. We continue to experience uncertainty as to whether government authorities will maintain the relaxation of current restrictions on businesses in the regions in which our properties are located, and whether government authorities will issue recommendations or impose requirements on landlords like us to further enhance health and safety protocols, or whether we will voluntarily adopt any of these requirements ourselves, which could result in increased operating costs and demands on our property management teams to ensure compliance with any of these requirements.

Partnership Investments

We account for our investments in partnerships that we do not control using the equity method of accounting. These investments, each of which represents a 25% to 50% noncontrolling ownership interest at December 31, 2021, are recorded initially at our cost, and subsequently adjusted for our share of net equity in income or loss and cash contributions and distributions. We do not control any of these equity method investees for the following reasons:

•

Except for two properties that we co-manage with our partner (effective January 1, 2021, one of these properties is now being managed by our partner), the other entities are managed on a day-to-day basis by one of our other partners as the managing general partner in each of the respective partnerships. In the case of the co-managed properties, all decisions in the ordinary course of business are made jointly.

•

The managing general partner is responsible for establishing the operating and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business.

•

All major decisions of each partnership, such as the sale, refinancing, expansion or rehabilitation of the property, require the approval of all partners.

•

Voting rights and the sharing of profits and losses are in proportion to the ownership percentages of each partner.

We do not have a direct legal claim to the assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses of the unconsolidated partnerships beyond our rights as an equity owner, in the event of any liquidation of such entity, and our rights as a tenant in common owner of certain unconsolidated properties.

We record the earnings from the unconsolidated partnerships using the equity method of accounting in the consolidated statements of operations in the caption entitled “Equity in (loss) income of partnerships,” rather than consolidating the results of the unconsolidated partnerships with our results. Certain non-recurring gains/losses on sales of real estate by equity method investee and impairment charges are reported on separate lines in our consolidated statements of operations. Changes in our investments in these entities are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet caption entitled “Investment in partnerships, at equity.” In the case of deficit investment balances, such amounts are recorded in “Distributions in excess of partnership investments.”

We hold legal title to a property owned by one of our unconsolidated partnerships through a tenancy in common arrangement. For this property, such legal title is held by us and another entity, and each has an undivided interest in title to the property. With respect to this property, under the applicable agreement between us and the other entity with an ownership interest, we and such other entity have joint control because decisions regarding matters such as the sale, refinancing, expansion or rehabilitation of the property require the approval of both us and the other entity owning an interest in the property. Hence, we account for this property like our other unconsolidated partnerships using the equity method of accounting. The balance sheet items arising from the properties appear under the caption “Investments in partnerships, at equity.” In the case of deficit investment balances, such amounts are recorded in “Distributions in excess of partnership investments.”

For further information regarding our unconsolidated partnerships, see Note 3.

F-13

Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that our most significant and subjective accounting estimates and assumptions are those relating to asset impairment and fair value.

Our management makes complex or subjective assumptions and judgments in applying its critical accounting policies. In making these judgments and assumptions, our management considers, among other factors, events and changes in property, market and economic conditions, estimated future cash flows from property operations, and the risk of loss on specific accounts or amounts.

Revenue and Receivables

We record base rent on a straight-line basis, which means that the monthly base rent revenue according to the terms of our leases with our tenants is adjusted so that an average monthly rent is recorded for each tenant over the term of its lease. When tenants vacate prior to the end of their lease, we accelerate amortization of any related unamortized straight-line rent balances, and unamortized above-market and below-market intangible balances are amortized as a decrease or increase to real estate revenue, respectively. The straight-line rent adjustment decreased revenue by $0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 and increased revenue by $2.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. The straight-line rent receivable balances included in tenant and other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $29.1 million and $29.8 million, respectively.

Revenue for rent received from tenants prior to their due dates is deferred until the period to which the rent applies.

Payments made to tenants as inducements to enter into a lease are treated as deferred costs that are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the term of the related lease.

F-14

Revenue from the reimbursement of marketing expenses is generated through tenant leases that require tenants to reimburse a defined amount of property marketing expenses. Our contractual performance obligations are fulfilled as marketing expenditures are made. Tenant payments are received monthly as required by the respective lease terms. We defer income recognition if the reimbursements exceed the aggregate marketing expenditures made through that date. Deferred marketing reimbursement revenue is recorded in tenants’ deposits and deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheet, and was $0.6 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The marketing reimbursements are recognized as revenue at the time that the marketing expenditures occur. Marketing revenue, included in other real estate revenues in the consolidated statements of operations, was $2.7 million and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Fair Value

Fair value accounting applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements.

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, these accounting requirements establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability and are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. We utilize the fair value hierarchy in our accounting for derivatives (Level 2) and financial instruments (Level 2) and in our reviews for impairment of real estate assets (Level 3) and goodwill (Level 3).

Financial Instruments

Carrying amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, accrued expenses, other liabilities and the First Lien Revolving Facility approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Term Loans (see Note 4) bear interest at variable rates that fluctuate with market rates. The carrying values of the Term Loans approximate their respective fair values. Most of our variable rate debt is subject to interest rate derivative instruments that have effectively fixed the interest rates on the

F-15

underlying debt. The estimated fair value for fixed rate debt, which is calculated for disclosure purposes, is based on the borrowing rates available to us for fixed rate mortgage loans with similar terms and maturities.

Impairment of Assets

Real estate investments and related intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property might not be recoverable, which is referred to as a “triggering event.” The COVID-19 impact on the economy and market conditions, together with the resulting closures of our properties and the delayed reopening of some tenants was deemed to be a triggering event as of June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2020, which led to impairment reviews for each of the respective quarters of 2020. COVID-19 impact was no longer a triggering event in 2021. In connection with our review of our long-lived assets for impairment, we utilize qualitative and quantitative factors in order to estimate fair value. The significant qualitative factors that we use include age and condition of the property, market conditions in the property’s trade area, competition with other shopping centers within the property’s trade area and the creditworthiness and performance of the property’s tenants. The significant quantitative factors that we use include historical and forecasted financial and operating information relating to the property, such as net operating income, estimated holding periods, occupancy statistics, vacancy projections and tenants’ sales levels.

If there is a triggering event in relation to a property to be held and used, we will estimate the aggregate future cash flows, net of estimated capital expenditures, to be generated by the property, undiscounted and without interest charges. In addition, this estimate may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or when a range of possible values is estimated.

The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by our management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in the anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could affect the determination of whether an impairment exists, and the effects of such changes could materially affect our net income. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, the carrying value is written down to its fair value. Our intent is to hold and operate our properties long-term, which reduces the likelihood that our carrying value is not recoverable. A shortened holding period would increase the likelihood that the carrying value is not recoverable.

Assessment of our ability to recover certain lease related costs must be made when we have a reason to believe that a tenant might not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires us to make estimates as to the recoverability of such costs.

Real Estate

Land, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements are recorded at cost and stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Renovations or replacements, which improve or extend the life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. For financial reporting purposes, properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:


Buildings		20-40 years
Land improvements		15 years
Furniture/fixtures		3-10 years
Tenant improvements		Lease term

We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our real estate assets for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to reflect on an annual basis with respect to those assets based on various factors, including industry standards, historical experience and the condition of the asset at the time of acquisition. These assessments affect our annual net income. If we were to determine that a different estimated useful life was appropriate for a particular asset, it would be depreciated over the newly estimated useful life, and, other things being equal, result in changes in annual depreciation expense and annual net income.

We recognize gains from sales of real estate properties and interests in partnerships when an enforceable contract is in place, control of the asset transfers to a buyer and it is probable that we will collect the consideration due in exchange for transferring the asset.

Real Estate Acquisitions

We account for our property acquisitions by allocating the purchase price of a property to the property’s assets based on management’s estimates of their fair value. Debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, and any resulting premium or discount is amortized through interest expense over the remaining term of the debt, resulting in a non-cash decrease (in the case of a premium) or increase (in the case of a discount) in interest expense. The determination of the fair value of intangible assets

F-16

requires significant estimates by management and considers many factors, including our expectations about the underlying property, the general market conditions in which the property operates and conditions in the economy. The judgment and subjectivity inherent in such assumptions can have a significant effect on the magnitude of the intangible assets or the changes to such assets that we record.

Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 each included $5.2 million (in each case, net of $1.1 million of amortization expense recognized prior to January 1, 2002) of goodwill recognized in connection with the acquisition of The Rubin Organization in 1997. Approximately $1.5 million of this goodwill balance is allocated to three equity method investees with negative investment balances.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three years ended December 31, 2021 were as follows:


			Accumulated
(in thousands of dollars)	Basis		Amortization			Total
Balance, January 1, 2020	$	6,322	$	(1,073	)	$	5,249
Goodwill divested		—		—			—
Balance, December 31, 2020		6,322		(1,073	)		5,249
Goodwill divested		—		—			—
Balance, December 31, 2021	$	6,322	$	(1,073	)	$	5,249

We allocate a portion of the purchase price of a property to intangible assets. Our methodology for this allocation includes estimating an “as-if vacant” fair value of the physical property, which is allocated to land, building and improvements. The difference between the purchase price and the “as-if vacant” fair value is allocated to intangible assets. There are three categories of intangible assets to be considered: (i) value of leases, (ii) above- and below-market value of in-place leases and (iii) customer relationship value, including operating covenants.

The value of in-place leases is estimated based on the value associated with the costs avoided in originating leases comparable to the acquired in-place leases, as well as the value associated with lost rental revenue during the assumed lease-up period. The value of in-place leases is amortized as real estate amortization over the remaining lease term.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimates of fair market lease rates for comparable in-place leases, based on factors such as historical experience, recently executed transactions and specific property issues, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. Above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any below-market optional renewal periods, and are included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

We allocate purchase price to customer relationship intangibles based on management’s assessment of the fair value of such relationships.

The following table presents our intangible assets and liabilities, net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	December 31,
(in thousands of dollars)	2021		2020
Intangible Assets:
Value of lease intangibles, net	$	4,805	$	6,143
Above-market lease intangibles, net		—		—
Subtotal		4,805		6,143
Goodwill, net		5,249		5,249
Total intangible assets	$	10,054	$	11,392
Intangible Liabilities
Below-market lease intangibles, net	$	95	$	134
Above-market ground lease		—		—
Total intangible liabilities	$	95	$	134

Intangible liabilities are included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of lease intangibles were $1.3 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

F-17

Net amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles increased revenue by $39 thousand and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. In the normal course of business, our intangible assets will amortize in the next five years and thereafter as follows:


(in thousands of dollars)	Value of Lease		Below Market
For the Year Ending December 31,	Intangibles		Leases, net
2022	$	1,207	$	(10	)
2023		1,205		(10	)
2024		1,161		(10	)
2025		319		(10	)
2026		222		(10	)
2027 and thereafter		691		(45	)
Total	$	4,805	$	(95	)

Assets Classified as Held for Sale

The determination to classify an asset as held for sale requires significant estimates by us about the property and the expected market for the property, which are based on factors including recent sales of comparable properties, recent expressions of interest in the property, financial metrics of the property and the physical condition of the property. We must also determine if it will be possible under those market conditions to sell the property for an acceptable price within one year. When assets are identified by our management as held for sale, we discontinue depreciating the assets and estimate the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. We generally consider operating properties to be held for sale when they meet criteria such as whether the sale transaction has been approved by the appropriate level of management and there are no known material contingencies relating to the sale such that the sale is probable and is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year. If the expected net sales price of the asset that has been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the asset, the asset is written down to fair value less the cost to sell. Assets and liabilities related to assets classified as held for sale are presented separately in the consolidated balance sheets. If we determine that a property no longer meets the held-for-sale criteria, we reclassify the property’s assets and liabilities to their original locations on the consolidated balance sheet and record depreciation and amortization expense for the period that the property was in held-for-sale status.

As of December 31, 2021, we determined that two of our hotel land parcels, two of our multifamily land parcels and one vacant anchor box space met the criteria to be classified as held for sale. As of December 31, 2020, we determined that two of our hotel land parcels met the criteria to be classified as held for sale.

Capitalization of Costs

Costs incurred in relation to development and redevelopment projects for interest, property taxes and insurance are capitalized only during periods in which activities necessary to prepare the property for its intended use are in progress. Costs incurred for such items after the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use are charged to expense as incurred. Capitalized costs, as well as tenant inducement amounts and internal and external commissions, are recorded in construction in progress. We capitalize a portion of development department employees’ compensation and benefits related to time spent involved in development and redevelopment projects. We also capitalize interest on equity method investments while the investee is engaged in activities necessary to commence its planned principal activities.

We capitalize payments made to obtain options to acquire real property. Other related costs that are incurred before acquisition that are expected to have ongoing value to the project are capitalized if the acquisition of the property is probable. If the property is acquired, other expenses related to the acquisition are recorded to project costs and other expenses. When it is probable that the property will not be acquired, capitalized pre-acquisition costs are charged to expense.

For leases under which we are a lessor, certain internal leasing and legal costs such as salaries, commissions and benefits related to time spent by leasing and legal department personnel involved in originating leases with third-party tenants were previously capitalized under ASC 840. However, they are now being recorded as period costs in accordance with ASC 842. We will continue to amortize previously capitalized initial direct costs over the remaining terms of the associated leases.

F-18

The following table summarizes our capitalized salaries, commissions and benefits, real estate taxes and interest for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands of dollars)	2021		2020
Development/Redevelopment:
Salaries and benefits	$	96	$	428
Real estate taxes	$	—	$	285
Interest	$	176	$	2,192
Leasing:
Salaries, commissions and benefits	$	164	$	150

Income Taxes

We have elected to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and intend to remain so qualified.

In some instances, we follow methods of accounting for income tax purposes that differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, will differ from net income or loss reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, differences in the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and differences between the allocation of our net income or loss for financial reporting purposes and for tax reporting purposes.

We could be subject to a federal excise tax computed on a calendar year basis if we were not in compliance with the distribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. We have, in the past, distributed a substantial portion of our taxable income in the subsequent fiscal year and might also follow this policy in the future. No provision for excise tax was made for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as no excise tax was due in those years.

The per share distributions paid to common shareholders had the following components for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2021		2020
Ordinary income	$	—	$	—
Non-dividend distribution		—		0.23
Per-share distributions	$	—	$	0.23

The per share distributions paid to Series B, Series C and Series D preferred shareholders had the following components for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2021		2020
Series B Preferred Share Dividends
Ordinary income	$	—	$	—
Non-dividend distributions		—		0.92
	$	—	$	0.92
Series C Preferred Share Dividends
Ordinary income	$	—	$	—
Non-dividend distributions		—		0.90
	$	—	$	0.90
Series D Preferred Share Dividends
Ordinary income	$	—	$	—
Non-dividend distributions		—		0.86
	$	—	$	0.86

We follow accounting requirements that prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. We must determine whether it is “more likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Once it is determined that a position meets the “more likely than not” recognition threshold, the position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that

F-19

is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the consolidated financial statements.

PRI is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. We had no federal or state income tax provision or benefit in the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020. We had net deferred tax assets of $11.0 million and $10.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The deferred tax assets are primarily the result of net operating losses. A valuation allowance has been established for the full amount of the net deferred tax assets, because we have determined that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized based on recent earnings history for our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain financing. Such costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related indebtedness. Interest expense is determined in a manner that approximates the effective interest method in the case of costs associated with mortgage loans, or on a straight line basis in the case of costs associated with our First Lien Revolving Facility and Term Loans (see note 4). Prior to the Financial Restructuring these costs were associated with our previous credit facility and term loan.

Derivatives

Currently, we use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs.

Derivative financial instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities based on the fair value of the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recognized currently in earnings, unless the derivative financial instrument meets the criteria for hedge accounting. If the derivative financial instruments meet the criteria for a cash flow hedge, the gains and losses in the fair value of the instrument are deferred in other comprehensive (loss) income. Gains and losses on a cash flow hedge are reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. A contract that is designated as a hedge of an anticipated transaction that is no longer likely to occur is immediately recognized in earnings.

The anticipated transaction to be hedged must expose us to interest rate risk, and the hedging instrument must reduce the exposure and meet the requirements for hedge accounting. We must formally designate the instrument as a hedge and document and assess the effectiveness of the hedge at inception and on a quarterly basis. Interest rate hedges that are designated as cash flow hedges are designed to mitigate the risks associated with future cash outflows on debt.

F-20

On December 10, 2020 as a result of the Financial Restructuring, we de-designated seven of our interest rate swaps which were previously designated cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan, as the hedged forecasted transactions were no longer probable to occur during the hedged time period due to the financial restructuring as described in Note 1. As such, the Company accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings which resulted in a loss of $2.8 million that was recorded within interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on December 10, 2020, the Company voluntarily de-designated the remaining thirteen interest swaps that were also previously designated as cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan. Upon de-designation, the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balance of each of these de-designated derivatives will be separately reclassified to earnings as the originally hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Through December 10, 2020, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets.

We recognize all derivatives at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Our derivative assets are recorded in “Deferred costs and other assets” and our derivative liabilities are recorded in “Fair value of derivative instruments.” Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are also used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For the eleven remaining interest rate swaps that were not re-designated subsequent to December 10, 2020, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded directly in earnings as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements. Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. As of December 31, 2021, we have assessed the significance of the effect of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Operating Partnership Unit Redemptions

Shares issued upon redemption of OP Units are recorded at the book value of the OP Units surrendered.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Share based payments to employees and non-employee trustees, including grants of restricted shares and share options, are valued at fair value on the date of grant, and are expensed over the applicable vesting period.

Earnings Per Share

The difference between basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding is the dilutive effect of common share equivalents. Common share equivalents consist primarily of shares that are issued under employee share compensation programs and outstanding share options whose exercise price is less than the average market price of our common shares during these periods.

New Accounting Developments

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting for contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). Companies may generally elect to apply the guidance for periods that include March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 to provide additional guidance around Topic 848 primarily as it relates to the ASU’s effect on derivative contracts. The Company is evaluating the anticipated impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements as well as timing of adoption.

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (Topic 805), which provides amendments to address diversity and inconsistency related to the recognition and measurement of contract assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Amendments require that an acquirer recognize and measure contract assets/liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. While this standard is not in effect at this time, the Company will evaluate and implement if applicable.

3. INVESTMENTS IN PARTNERSHIPS

The following table presents summarized financial information of our equity investments in unconsolidated partnerships as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	December 31,
(in thousands of dollars)	2021			2020
ASSETS:
Investments in real estate, at cost:
Operating properties	$	847,560		$	824,328
Construction in progress		6,456			20,632
Total investments in real estate		854,016			844,960
Accumulated depreciation		(247,133	)		(224,641	)
Net investments in real estate		606,883			620,319
Cash and cash equivalents		59,004			28,060
Deferred costs and other assets, net		155,247			161,465
Total assets		821,134			809,844
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ INVESTMENT:
Mortgage loans payable, net		493,904			491,119
FDP Term Loan, net		194,602			201,000
Partnership Loan		115,543			100,000
Other liabilities		141,619			132,715
Total liabilities		945,668			924,834
Net investment		(124,534	)		(114,990	)
Partners’ share		(62,771	)		(59,080	)
PREIT’s share		(61,763	)		(55,910	)
Excess investment (1)		6,718			6,390
Net investments and advances	$	(55,045	)	$	(49,520	)
Investment in partnerships, at equity	$	16,525		$	27,066
Distributions in excess of partnership investments		(71,570	)		(76,586	)
Net investments and advances	$	(55,045	)	$	(49,520	)

F-23

(1) Excess investment represents the unamortized difference between our investment and our share of the equity in the underlying net investment in the unconsolidated partnerships. The excess investment is amortized over the life of the properties, and the amortization is included in “Equity in (loss) income of partnerships.”

We record distributions from our equity investments using the nature of the distribution approach.

The following table summarizes our share of equity in (loss) income of partnerships for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands of dollars)	2021			2020
Real estate revenue	$	120,861		$	101,762
Expenses:
Property operating and other expenses		(52,111	)		(48,285	)
Interest expense		(44,547	)		(27,665	)
Depreciation and amortization		(29,200	)		(34,947	)
Total expenses		(125,858	)		(110,897	)
Net (loss) income		(4,997	)		(9,135	)
Less: Partners’ share		1,469			4,186
PREIT’s share		(3,528	)		(4,949	)
Amortization of excess investment		(204	)		(595	)
Equity in (loss) income of partnerships	$	(3,732	)	$	(5,544	)

Fashion District Philadelphia

Sale of 801 Market Street, Unit 202

In May 2021, PM Gallery LP, a Delaware limited partnership and joint venture entity owned indirectly by us and The Macerich Company (“Macerich”), sold, through a subsidiary, a portion of an asset at Fashion District Philadelphia (“FDP”) for $5.3 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $2.6 million for the joint venture, our share of which is $1.3 million at a 50% share. The gain is recorded in gain on sales of real estate by equity method investee in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.

FDP Loan Agreement

PM Gallery LP previously entered into a $250.0 million term loan in January 2018 (as amended in July 2019 to increase the total maximum potential borrowings to $350.0 million) to fund the ongoing redevelopment of Fashion District Philadelphia and to repay capital contributions to the venture previously made by the partners. A total of $51.0 million was drawn during the third quarter of 2019 and we received aggregate distributions of $25.0 million as our share of the draws. On December 10, 2020, PM Gallery LP, together with certain other subsidiaries owned indirectly by us and Macerich (including the fee and leasehold owners of the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project), entered into the FDP Loan Agreement. In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, a $100.0 million principal payment was made (and funded indirectly by Macerich, the “Partnership Loan”) to pay down the existing loan, reducing the outstanding principal under the FDP Loan Agreement from $301.0 million to $201.0 million. The joint venture must repay the Partnership Loan plus 15% accrued interest to Macerich, in its capacity as lender, prior to the resumption of 50/50 cash distributions to the Company and its joint venture partner.

The FDP Loan Agreement provides for (i) a maturity date of January 22, 2023, with the potential for a one-year extension upon the borrowers’ satisfaction of certain conditions, (ii) an interest rate at the borrowers’ option with respect to each advance of either (A) the Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.00%) plus 2.50% or (B) LIBOR for the applicable period plus 3.50%, (iii) a full recourse guarantee of 50% of the borrowers’ obligations by PREIT Associates, L.P., on a several basis, (iv) a full recourse guarantee of certain of the borrowers’ obligations by The Macerich Partnership, L.P., up to a maximum of $50.0 million, on a several basis, (v) a pledge of the equity interests of certain indirect subsidiaries of PREIT and Macerich, as well as of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, that have a direct or indirect ownership interest in the borrowers, (vi) a non-recourse carve-out guaranty and a hazardous materials indemnity by each of PREIT Associates, L.P. and The Macerich Partnership, L.P., and (vii) mortgages of the borrowers’ fee and leasehold interests in the properties that are part of the Fashion District Philadelphia project and certain other properties. The FDP Loan Agreement contains certain covenants typical for loans of its type. We anticipate FDP not meeting certain financial covenants applicable under the FDP Loan Agreement during 2022. See Going Concern Considerations section in Note 1.

Joint Venture

F-24

In connection with the execution of the FDP Loan Agreement, the governing structure of PM Gallery LP was modified such that, effective as of January 1, 2021, Macerich is responsible for the entity’s operations and, subject to limited exceptions, controls major decisions. The Company considered the changes to the governing structure of PM Gallery LP and determined the investment qualifies as a variable interest entity and will continue to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Our maximum exposure to losses indicated below is limited to the extent of our investment, which is a 50% ownership.

The table below includes the total assets and liabilities of the unconsolidated joint venture as of the December 10, 2020 remeasurement date.


Unconsolidated joint venture assets	$	401,655
Unconsolidated joint venture liabilities		363,393
Unconsolidated joint venture net assets	$	38,262

Equity interest in joint venture (based on 50% ownership)	$	19,131
Equity interests on the consolidated balance sheets (1)	$	16,261
Maximum risk of loss	$	16,261

(1) Amount shown is net of a 15% discount for non-controlling interest ownership

In connection with the December 10, 2020 remeasurement of assets of FDP, the joint venture recognized a loss on remeasurement of assets of which our share was $145.7 million and we recorded $2.8 million of other than temporary impairment on the fair value of our non-controlling ownership interest in the joint venture. These amounts are included in loss on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee in our consolidated statement of operations.

Mortgage Loans of Unconsolidated Properties

Mortgage loans, which are secured by seven of the unconsolidated properties (including one property under development), are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2027. Five of the mortgage loans bear interest at a fixed interest rate and two of the mortgage loans bear interest at a variable interest rate. The balances of the fixed interest rate mortgage loans have interest rates that range from 3.20% to 5.00% and had a weighted average interest rate of 4.13% at December 31, 2021. The balances of the variable interest rate mortgage loans have interest rates that range from 1.60% to 4.00% and had a weighted average interest rate of 1.89% at December 31, 2021. The weighted average interest rate of all unconsolidated mortgage loans was 3.86% at December 31, 2021. The liability under each mortgage loan is limited to the unconsolidated partnership that owns the particular property. Our proportionate share, based on our respective partnership interest, of principal payments due in the next five years and thereafter is as follows:


	Company’s Proportionate Share
(in thousands of dollars) For the Year Ending December 31,	Principal Amortization		Balloon Payments		Total		Property Total
2022	$	4,131	$	21,500	$	25,631	$	94,292
2023		4,009		36,362		40,371		82,191
2024		3,838		—		3,838		7,675
2025		4,625		26,299		30,924		61,848
2026 and thereafter		13,794		111,313		125,107		250,238
Total principal payments	$	30,397	$	195,474	$	225,871		496,244
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs								2,340
Carrying value of mortgage notes payable							$	493,904

F-25

Mortgage Loan Activity

Gloucester Premium Outlets
On March 1, 2022, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary exercised its one-year extension option of its mortgage loan securing its property at Gloucester Premium Outlets. The $86.0 million loan maturing on March 1, 2023 has a variable interest rate.

Pavilion at Market East

On May 25, 2021, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary completed a refinance of its mortgage loan securing its property at Pavilion at Market East. The $7.6 million mortgage has a 2-year term, maturing in May 2023. The loan has interest only payments until May 2022 at a variable rate of the greater of (a) one month LIBOR plus 3.5% or (b) 4.0%.

The Court at Oxford Valley

On June 25, 2021, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary completed a refinance of its mortgage loan securing its property at the Court at Oxford Valley. The $55.0 million mortgage has a 10-year term, maturing on July 1, 2031. The loan has interest only payments until August 2024 at a fixed interest rate of 3.2%.

Red Rose Commons

On June 30, 2021, the Company’s unconsolidated subsidiary completed a refinance of its mortgage loan securing its property at Red Rose Commons. The $34.0 million mortgage has a 10-year term, maturing on July 6, 2031 at a fixed interest rate of 3.3%.

4. FINANCING ACTIVITY

Credit Agreements

On December 10, 2020, we entered into the Credit Agreements: (a) an Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo Bank") and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees, for secured loan facilities consisting of: (i) a secured first lien revolving credit facility allowing for borrowings up to $130.0 million, including a sub-facility for letters of credit to be issued thereunder in an aggregate stated amount of up to $10.0 million (collectively, the “First Lien Revolving Facility”), and (ii) a $384.5 million secured first lien term loan facility (the “First Lien Term Loan Facility”), and (b) a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Agreement”), as amended February 8, 2021, with Wells Fargo Bank and the other financial institutions signatory thereto and their assignees for a $535.2 million secured second lien term loan facility (the “Second Lien Term Loan Facility”). The Credit Agreements mature in December 2022. The First Lien Term Loan Facility and the Second Lien Term Loan Facility are collectively referred to as the “Term Loans.” The Credit Agreements refinanced our previously existing secured term loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020 (as amended, the “Bridge Credit Agreement”), our Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement entered into on January 8, 2014 (as amended, the “7-Year Term Loan”), and our 2018 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement entered into on May 24, 2018 (as amended, the “2018 Credit Agreement”) and collectively with the Bridge Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan, the “Restructured Credit Agreements”). Upon our entry into the Credit Agreements, the Bridge Credit Agreement, the 7-Year Term Loan and the 2018 Credit Agreement were cancelled.

As of December 31, 2021, we had borrowed $965.7 million under the Term Loans and $54.5 million under the First Lien Revolving Facility. The carrying value of the Term Loans on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 is net of $6.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. The maximum amount that was available to us under the First Lien Revolving Facility as of December 31, 2021 was $75.5 million.

On April 13, 2021, we entered into Agency Resignation, Appointment, Acceptance and Waiver Agreements pursuant to which Wells Fargo Bank resigned as Administrative Agent and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB was appointed successor Administrative Agent under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the Second Lien Credit Agreement and, in each case, the related loan documents. There is currently no successor letter of credit issuer under the First Lien Revolving Facility, accordingly, the Company cannot currently access the letters of credit sub-facility.

F-26

Interest expense and deferred financing fee amortization related to the Credit Agreements, 2018 Credit Agreement, 7-Year Term Loan and the Bridge Credit Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands of dollars)	2021	2020
Revolving Facilities:
Interest expense (1)	$2,222	$10,713
Deferred financing amortization (2)	1,194	1,112
Term Loans:
Interest expense (3)	84,594	32,167
Deferred financing amortization (4)	7,130	1,907

(1)

All of the expense applied to the First Lien Revolving Facility in 2021

(2)

$0.1 million of 2020 amortization applied to the First Lien Revolving Facility and the remaining amortization applied to the Restructured Revolver.

(3)

All of the 2021 expense applied to the Term Loans, of which $4.2 million was for the Second Lien Term Loan Facility and was not paid in cash, but capitalized to the principal balance of the loan.

(4)

$4.3 million of 2020 expense applied to the Term Loans, of which $2.8 million was for the Second Lien Term Loan Facility and was not paid in cash, but capitalized to the principal balance of the loan. $3.2 million applied to the Bridge Credit Agreement with the remaining expense applied to the Restructured Term Loans.

The Credit Agreements each provide for a two-year maturity of December 2022 (the “Maturity Date”), subject to a one-year extension to December 2023 at the borrowers’ option, subject to (i) minimum liquidity of $35.0 million, (ii) a minimum corporate debt yield of 8.0%, (iii) a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 105% for the total first lien and second lien loans and letters of credit and the Borrowing Base Properties as determined by an appraisal and (iv) no default or event of default existing and our representations and warranties being true in all material respects. The loans under the Credit Agreements are repayable in full on the Maturity Date, subject to mandatory prepayment provisions in the event of certain events including asset sales, incurrence of indebtedness, issuances of equity and receipt of casualty insurance proceeds. The terms of our Credit Agreements place restrictions on, among other things, and subject to certain exceptions, our ability to make certain restricted payments (including payments of dividends), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate, or sell our assets or the equity interests in our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. Additionally, if we receive net cash proceeds from certain capital events (including equity issuances), we are required to prepay loans under our Credit Agreements. In addition, the Credit Agreements contain cross-default provisions that trigger an event of default if we fail to make certain payments or otherwise fail to comply with our obligations with respect to certain of our other indebtedness, including obligations under the FDP Loan Agreement.

In connection with entering into the Credit Agreements, the Company incurred $26.8 million in expenses, $5.6 million of which were incurred prior to November 1, 2020 and were included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet on the Effective Date. Of the $26.8 million, $3.8 million was directly attributable to the Company’s bankruptcy proceedings and were therefore classified as reorganization expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company capitalized $14.1 million of the total expenses as deferred financing costs and allocated those costs between the First Lien Revolving Facility, the First Lien Term Loan Facility and Second Lien Term Loan Facility. The Company expensed $8.0 million of the total costs, which are classified within general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company classified a portion of the costs within loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million and the Company accelerated the amortization of a portion of its previously recognized deferred financing fees, which resulted in $0.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2020.

First Lien Credit Agreement

Amounts borrowed under the First Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus (w) for revolving loans, 2.50% per annum, and (x) for term loans, 4.74% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus (y) for revolving loans, 3.50% per annum, and (z) for term loans, 5.74% per annum, in each case, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in cash on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) and on the Maturity Date. We are required to pay certain fees to the administrative agent

F-27

for the account of the lenders in connection with the First Lien Credit Agreement, including an unused fee for the account of the revolving lenders, which will accrue (i) 0.35% per annum on the daily amount of the unused revolving commitments when that amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments, and (ii) 0.25% when that amount is less than 50% of the aggregate amount of revolving commitments. Accrued and unpaid unused fees will be payable quarterly in arrears during the term of the First Lien Credit Agreement and on the Revolving Termination Date (or any earlier date of termination of the revolving commitments or reduction of the revolving commitments to zero).

Letters of credit and the proceeds of revolving loans may be used (i) to refinance indebtedness under the Bridge Credit Agreement (which agreement was cancelled and refinanced upon our entry into the Credit Agreements), (ii) for working capital and general corporate purposes (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the First Lien Credit Agreement, including limitations on investments in non-Borrowing Base Properties), and (iii) to fund professional fee payments and other fees and expenses subject to the provisions of the Plan and related confirmation order and for other uses permitted by the provisions of the First Lien Credit Agreement, Plan and confirmation order, in each case consistent with an approved annual business plan. We may terminate or reduce the amount of the revolving commitments at any time and from time to time without penalty or premium, subject to the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement.

The First Lien Credit Agreement contains, among other restrictions, certain additional affirmative and negative covenants and other terms, many of which substantially align with those in the Second Lien Credit Agreement and are summarized below under “Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements.”

Second Lien Credit Agreement

Amounts borrowed under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may be either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bear interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate will not be less than 1.50% per annum, in each case plus 7.00% per annum. LIBOR Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum, provided that LIBOR will not be less than 0.50% per annum. Interest is due to be paid in kind on the last day of each applicable interest period (with rolling 30-day interest periods) by adding the accrued and unpaid amount thereof to the principal balance of the loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement and then accruing interest on the increased principal amount (provided that after the discharge of our Senior Debt Obligations, interest will be paid in cash). We are required to pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

The proceeds of loans under the Second Lien Credit Agreement may only be used to refinance existing indebtedness under the 2018 Credit Agreement and the 7-Year Term Loan.

The Second Lien Credit Agreement contains, among other restrictions, certain additional affirmative and negative covenants and other terms, many of which substantially align with those in the First Lien Credit Agreement and are summarized below under “Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements.”

On February 8, 2021, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Second Lien Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided for elimination of approximately $5.3 million of the disputed default interest that was capitalized into the principal balance of the Second Lien Term Loan Facility on the effective date thereof, reducing the outstanding principal amount of loans outstanding under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, retroactively, as of December 10, 2020, to $535.2 million. The First Amendment also eliminated the disputed PIK interest that was capitalized through the date of the amendment.

Similar Terms of the Credit Agreements

Each of the Credit Agreements contains certain affirmative and negative covenants and other provisions, as described in detail below, which substantially align with those contained in the other Credit Agreements.

Covenants

Each of the Credit Agreements contains, among other restrictions, certain affirmative and negative covenants, including, without limitation, requirements that we:

•

maintain liquidity of at least $25.0 million, to be comprised of unrestricted cash held in certain deposit accounts subject to control agreements, up to $5.0 million held in a certain other deposit account excluded from the collateral, the unused revolving loan commitments under the First Lien Credit Agreement (to the extent available to be drawn), and amounts on deposit in a designated collateral proceeds account and amounts on deposit in a cash collateral account;

•

maintain a minimum senior debt yield of 11.35% from and after June 30, 2021;

•

maintain a minimum corporate debt yield of (a) 6.50% from June 30, 2021 through and including September 30, 2021 and (b) 7.25% from and after October 1, 2021;

•

provide to the administrative agent, among other things, PREIT and its subsidiaries’ quarterly and annual financial statements, annual budget, reports on projected sources and uses of cash, and an updated annual business plan, as well as quarterly and annual operating

F-28

statements, rent rolls, and certain other collections and tenant reports and information as the administrative agent may reasonably request with respect to each Borrowing Base Property;

•

maintain PREIT’s status as a REIT;

•

use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreements from each tenant under certain Major leases as well as ground lease estoppel certificates from each ground lessor of a Borrowing Base Property;

•

comply with the requirements of the various security documents and, at the administrative agent’s request, promptly notify the administrative agent of any acquisition of any owned real property that is not subject to a mortgage and grant liens on such real property to secure our obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement;

•

not amend any existing sale agreements with respect to Borrowing Base Properties to result in a reduction of cash consideration by 20% or more; and

•

not retain more than $6.5 million of cash in property-level accounts held by our subsidiaries that are owners of real property (subject to certain exceptions).

Each of the Credit Agreements also limits our ability, subject to certain exceptions, to make certain restricted payments (including payments of dividends and voluntary prepayments of certain indebtedness which includes, with respect to the First Lien Credit Agreement, voluntary prepayments under the Second Lien Credit Agreement), make certain types of investments and acquisitions, issue redeemable securities, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on our assets, enter into agreements with a negative pledge, make certain intercompany transfers, merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all of our assets or the equity interests in our subsidiaries, amend our organizational documents or material contracts, enter into transactions with affiliates, or enter into derivatives contracts. We are also prohibited from selling certain properties unless certain conditions are satisfied with respect to the terms of the sale agreement for such property or, in the case of Borrowing Base Properties, payment of certain release prices.

The First Lien Credit Agreement and, after our Senior Debt Obligations are discharged, the Second Lien Credit Agreement, each prohibit us from (i) entering into Major Leases, (ii) assigning leases, (iii) discounting any rent under leases where the leased premises is at least 7,500 square feet at a Borrowing Base Property and the discounted amount is more than $750,000 and more than 25% of the aggregate contractual base rent payable over the initial term (not including any extension options), (iv) collecting rent in advance, (v) terminating or modifying the terms of any Major Lease or releasing or discharging tenants from any obligations thereunder, (vi) consenting to a tenant’s assignment or subletting of a Major Lease, or (vii) subordinating any lease to any other deed of trust, mortgage, deed to secure debt or encumbrance, other than the mortgages already encumbering the applicable Borrowing Base Property and the mortgages entered into in connection with the other Credit Agreement. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement and, under the Second Lien Credit Agreement after the First Lien Termination Date, any amounts equal to or greater than $2.5 million but less than $3.5 million received by or on behalf of a guarantor in consideration of any termination or modification of a lease (or the release or discharge of a tenant) are subject to restrictions on use, and such amounts that are equal to or greater than $3.5 million must be applied to reduce our outstanding obligations under the applicable Credit Agreement.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreements.

Voluntary and Mandatory Prepayments

•

in the event of any debt issuance, in an amount equal to 100% of net cash proceeds;

•

in the event of any equity issuance, in an amount equal to 50% of net cash proceeds (with the other 50% of such net cash proceeds required to prepay the loans (under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the revolving loans) or be deposited into a designated collateral proceeds account);

•

in the event of any asset disposition (other than an asset disposition of all or any portion of a Borrowing Base Property), in an amount equal to 70% of net cash proceeds (with the other 30% of net cash proceeds required to either prepay the loans (under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the revolving loans) or be deposited into a designated collateral proceeds account);

•

in the event of any insurance and condemnation event with respect to collateral that is not a Borrowing Base Property, 100% of net cash proceeds, except for such amounts that we have elected to reinvest for reconstruction of property in accordance with the terms of the applicable Credit Agreement; and

•

in the event of any insurance and condemnation event at a Borrowing Base Property, all net cash proceeds at the request of the administrative agent, provided that the administrative agent is required to release all or a portion of the funds to us for specified uses depending on the amount of net cash proceeds.

In the event of certain non-guarantor prepayment events resulting in the receipt of net cash proceeds by a borrower or guarantor of our non-guarantor subsidiaries or joint ventures, those amounts are required to prepay loans (and under the First Lien Credit Agreement, prepay loans or be used to cash collateralize the letter of credit liabilities or specified derivatives obligations, as applicable) as follows (subject to certain

F-29

exceptions): (a) 100% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes a debt issuance, (b) 50% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an equity issuance, (c) 100% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an insurance condemnation event, and (d) 70% of net cash proceeds received if the event constitutes an asset disposition, provided, in each case (subject to certain exceptions), that the net cash proceeds received and not otherwise required to prepay loans must either prepay loans (under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the revolving loans) or be deposited into a designated collateral proceeds account.

•

in the event a Borrowing Base Property is released, the greater of (x) 110% of the property’s closing date appraised value, as reduced by any prepayment made in connection with the release, and (y) 100% of the net cash proceeds received from the sale of the property;

•

in the event an income producing parcel is released, 100% of net cash proceeds; and

•

in the event a non-income producing parcel is released, 70% of net cash proceeds (with the other 30% required to either (i) prepay loans (under the First Lien Credit Agreement, the revolving loans) or (ii) be deposited into a designated collateral proceeds account).

We may request disbursements from the designated collateral proceeds account subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to a disbursement of loans (or in the case of the First Lien Credit Agreement, revolving loans), the proceeds of which must be used in a manner consistent with an approved annual business plan. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, no revolving loans will be disbursed at any time that designated collateral proceeds are on deposit and we may elect to apply designated collateral proceeds as a principal prepayment of the revolving loans at any time. Under the Second Lien Credit Agreement, amounts in the designated collateral proceeds account in accordance with the First Lien Credit Agreement are held by the administrative agent as additional collateral securing our obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement.

Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, we have pledged and granted to the administrative agent an additional security interest in a letter of credit collateral account.

Events of Default

In addition to customary events of default including, among other things, non-payment or non-performance under each of the Credit Agreements, events of default include our (i) failure to pay Material Indebtedness (defined as indebtedness with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $25.0 million or more, or $250.0 million in the case of Nonrecourse Indebtedness), and (ii) the acceleration of such Material Indebtedness (or the occurrence of any event that would permit the holders of such Material Indebtedness to accelerate such Material Indebtedness), in each case, provided that no event of default will result from a default, event of default, acceleration or other action in connection with a guaranty by a loan party of indebtedness secured by a mortgage on a non-Borrowing Base Property until the earliest to occur of (x) commencement of a related court proceeding, (y) in the event such loan party has agreed that an event permitting acceleration of the guaranty has occurred, 45 days following the expiration or termination of a related forbearance agreement, subject to certain conditions, or (z) such loan party makes or agrees to make a payment in satisfaction of any claim made on the guaranty in connection with the event of default, acceleration or other action. The First Lien Credit Agreement also provides that the non-subordination of second priority liens is an event of default.

F-30

Restructured Credit Agreements

Prior to completion of the Financial Restructuring, we had entered into three credit agreements: (1) the 2018 Credit Agreement, which included (a) the $375.0 million 2018 Revolving Facility (“Restructured Revolver”), and (b) the $300.0 million 2018 Term Loan Facility, (2) the $250.0 million 2014 7-Year Term Loan, and (3) the Bridge Credit Agreement. Throughout 2020, we entered into various amendments to the Restructured Credit Agreements. On August 11, 2020, we entered into the Bridge Credit Agreement which provided for up to $30.0 million of additional borrowings and an original maturity date of September 30, 2020. On September 30, 2020, we amended our Restructured Credit Agreements to, among other things, extend the maturity date of the Bridge Credit Agreement until October 31, 2020 and to provide for the ability to request additional commitments of up to $25.0 million under our Bridge Credit Agreement. The September 2020 amendments also eliminated the minimum liquidity requirement under each of the Restructured Credit Agreements. We also amended the Bridge Credit Agreement on October 16, 2020 to, among other things, increase the aggregate amount of commitments under the Bridge Credit Agreement by $25.0 million.

As of November 1, 2020, we had borrowed $590.0 million available under the Restructured Credit Agreements, including $55.0 million under our Bridge Credit Agreement and the full $375.0 million under the 2018 Revolving Facility.

Amounts borrowed under the 2018 Credit Agreement or the 7-Year Term Loan Agreements, which could be either LIBOR Loans or Base Rate Loans, bore interest at the rate specified below per annum, depending on our leverage. The applicable interest rates for amounts borrowed under our Bridge Credit Agreement are described further below.

During the period for which certain of the financial covenants under the 2018 Credit Agreement and 2018 Term Loan Facility were suspended (the “Suspension Period”), the Applicable Margin was determined based on the Level 5 Ratio of Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value (listed below). In determining our leverage (the ratio of Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value), the capitalization rate used to calculate Gross Asset Value was (a) 6.50% for each property having an average sales per square foot of more than $500 for the most recent period of 12 consecutive months, and (b) 7.50% for any other property. Prior to July 27, 2020 amendment, the 2018 Revolving Facility was subject to a facility fee, which varied based on leverage and was 0.35% as of July 27, 2020 and was recorded in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Subsequent to July 27, 2020 the 2018 Revolving Facility was no longer subject to a facility fee.

The Restructured Credit Agreements contained certain affirmative and negative covenants, several of which were amended on March 30, 2020. Pursuant to the July 2020 amendments, some of those covenants were suspended for the duration of the Suspension Period, as extended by the September 30, 2020 amendments. As such, the Restructured Credit Agreements, as amended, restricted our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common shares and preferred shares for the duration of the Suspension Period. The filing of the chapter 11 cases constituted an event of default under the Restructured Credit Agreements.

We were permitted to prepay the amounts due under the Restructured Credit Agreements at any time without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement obligations for the lenders’ breakage costs for LIBOR borrowings. We were required to make prepayments under the 2018 Term Loan Facility in an amount equal to 54.55% of any net cash proceeds received from certain capital events (provided that any net cash proceeds from capital events in excess of $150 million were required to be applied 50% toward repayment of outstanding amounts under the 2018 Revolving Facility with 54.55% of the remaining 50% applied to prepay amounts under the 2018 Term Loan Facility), subject to certain exceptions. If we had more than $50.0 million of unrestricted cash on our balance sheet for five consecutive days, we were required to prepay the 2018 Revolving Facility with our excess cash above $50.0 million. We were also required to make prepayments under the 7-Year Term Loan in an amount equal to 45.45% of any net cash proceeds received from certain capital events (provided that any net cash proceeds from capital events in excess of $150 million were required to be applied 50% toward repayment of outstanding amounts under the 2018 Revolving Facility with 45.45% of the remaining 50% applied to prepay the amounts outstanding under the 7-Year Term Loan), subject to certain exceptions. We also made monthly principal amortization payments of $1.09 million of the term loan under the 2018 Credit Agreement and of $909 thousand of the term loan under the 7-Year Term Loan, in each case for the months of April, May, June, July, August and September of 2020.

The Company’s obligations under the Bridge Credit Agreement and related guaranty were secured by mortgages and deeds of trust on a portfolio of 12 of our subsidiaries’ properties, including nine malls and three additional parcels. The obligations were further secured by a pledge of substantially all of the personal property of the Company and the guarantors pursuant to a collateral agreement and a pledge of substantially all of the equity interests of the guarantors (subject to limited exceptions) pursuant to a pledge agreement. The initial maturity date

F-31

of the Bridge Credit Agreement was the earlier of (a) September 30, 2020, or (b) the date the obligations under the Bridge Facility were accelerated. On September 30, 2020, the maturity date was extended to October 31, 2020.

Amounts borrowed under the Bridge Credit Agreement were either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base Rate Loans bore interest at the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.0%, provided that the Base Rate would not be less than 2.00% per annum, in each case plus 7.00% per annum. LIBOR Loans bore interest at LIBOR plus 8.00% per annum. After the initial borrowing and prior to the October 2020 amendment, the Company was only permitted to draw when its unrestricted cash and cash equivalents were equal to or less than $12.5 million, and subsequent borrowings were determined according to a multiple of amounts set forth in the loan budget. Pursuant to the October 2020 amendment to the Bridge Credit Agreement, the commitments under the Bridge Credit Agreement were increased by $25.0 million and the entire $25.0 million was drawn and deposited into a cash collateral account. We could only draw amounts from the cash collateral account holding the unfunded amount of commitments if our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (not including the cash in such account) was equal to or less than $12.5 million. The Company was also required to pay certain fees to the administrative agent for the account of the lenders in connection with the Bridge Credit Agreement, including a ticking fee, which accrued 0.50% per annum on the daily amount of the unused commitments. Accrued and unpaid ticking fees were payable on the maturity date.

The Bridge Credit Agreement permitted prepayment at any time without premium or penalty. At any time that the borrower or any guarantor or subsidiary or unconsolidated joint venture thereof (to the extent that such entity has the ability to require a distribution from such joint venture of its portion of net cash proceeds) received net cash proceeds from any capital event, the borrower was required to prepay the Bridge Facility in an amount equal to 100% of such net Cash proceeds (or with respect to any joint venture, the portion of such net cash proceeds distributed to the borrower or any guarantor).

Consolidated Mortgage Loans

Our consolidated mortgage loans, which are secured by nine of our consolidated properties, are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2025. Our nine properties include Valley View Mall, which was assigned to a receiver in the third quarter 2020. Although we have not yet conveyed Valley View Mall because foreclosure proceedings are ongoing, we no longer control or operate the property as a result of court order assigning the receiver. The mortgage principal balance of Valley View Mall was $27.2 million at December 31, 2021, which we will continue to recognize until the foreclosure process is completed. Six of these mortgage loans bear interest at fixed interest rates that range from 3.88% to 5.95% and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.98% at December 31, 2021. Three of our mortgage loans bear interest at variable rates and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.72% at December 31, 2021. The weighted average interest rate of all consolidated mortgage loans was 3.98% at December 31, 2021. Mortgage loans for properties owned by unconsolidated partnerships are accounted for in “Investments in partnerships, at equity” and “Distributions in excess of partnership investments,” and are not included in the table below.

The following table outlines the timing of principal payments and balloon payments pursuant to the terms of our consolidated mortgage loans of our consolidated properties as of December 31, 2021:


(in thousands of dollars) For the Year Ending December 31,	Principal Amortization		Balloon Payments			Total
2022	$	12,474	$	430,290	(1) (2)	$	442,764
2023		6,587		53,299			59,886
2024		6,405		127,685			134,090
2025		4,376		211,346			215,722
2026 and thereafter		—		—			—
Total principal payments	$	29,842	$	822,620			852,462
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs							1,209
Carrying value of mortgage notes payable						$	851,253

(1)

Our mortgage secured by Valley View Mall was in default as of December 31, 2021. The property conveyance process is not complete as of December 31, 2021. The $27.2 million mortgage balance is included in our 2022 balloon payments.

(2)

On December 10, 2021, we entered into an amendment to extend the maturity of our mortgage secured by Woodland Mall to December 2022. The $113.8 million mortgage balance is included in our 2022 balloon payments.

(3)

We expect to refinance on similar terms or extend maturities for secured mortgage loans with balloon payments other than the Valley View Mall debt.

F-32

The estimated fair values of our consolidated mortgage loans based on year-end interest rates and market conditions at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:


	2021				2020
(in millions of dollars)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Consolidated mortgage loans (1)	$	852.5	$	846.6	$	885.5	$	873.2

(1) The carrying value of consolidated mortgage loans has been reduced by unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.2 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The consolidated mortgage loans contain various customary default provisions. As of December 31, 2021, we were not in default on any of the consolidated mortgage loans, except for our mortgage secured by Valley View Mall.

Mortgage Loan Activity

Francis Scott Key Mall

On June 25, 2021, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries entered into an amendment to our mortgage loan secured by our property at Francis Scott Key Mall, in Frederick, Maryland, which provided for a reduction in principal balance from property cash on hand to $60.5 million, an extension of the maturity date until June 25, 2024, with an option to extend an additional year if certain criteria are met. Among other things, the amendment also provides for a variable interest rate of one month LIBOR plus 3.6% with interest only payments. Also, the amendment provides for excess cash flow from the property to be deposited into a cash collateral account which will be used at the administrative agent’s discretion to pay down the mortgage loan balance until certain requirements are met. The Company capitalized $0.3 million of lender fees as additional debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.

Viewmont Mall

On June 25, 2021, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries entered into an amendment to our $67.2 million mortgage loan secured by our property at Viewmont Mall in Scranton, Pennsylvania, which provides for an extension of the maturity date until June 25, 2024, with an option to extend an additional year if certain criteria are met. Among other things, the amendment also provides for a variable interest rate of one month LIBOR plus 3.6% with interest only payments. Also, the amendment provides for excess cash flow from the property to be deposited into a cash collateral account which will be used at the administrative agent’s discretion to pay down the mortgage loan balance until certain requirements are met. The Company capitalized $0.5 million of lender fees as additional debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.

Woodland Amendment

On December 10, 2021, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries entered into an amendment to our mortgage loan secured by our property at Woodland Mall in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which provides for an extension of the maturity date until December 10, 2022. The Company capitalized $0.3 million of lender fees as additional debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.

Note Payable

In April 2020, in light of the impact of COVID-19 on our business and limited capital resources, we applied for and received proceeds from a potentially forgivable loan in the amount of $4.5 million under the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act. We entered into a note payable with our lender bank (“Note Payable”). The Note Payable had a maturity date on April 15, 2022. Based on the CARES Act and the Note Payable, all payments of both principal and interest were deferred until at least August 2021. Interest on the Note Payable accrued at a rate of 1.0% per annum, and the interest accrued throughout the period the Note Payable was outstanding, until the forgiveness date. All or a portion of PPP loans are eligible for forgiveness pursuant to program guidelines to the extent the proceeds are used for qualifying purposes within a 24-week period following the loan funding. In April 2021, we submitted our loan forgiveness application. On June 10, 2021, we were notified that the full principal balance and accrued interest under our PPP loan were forgiven. As a result, during the second quarter of 2021, we recorded a gain on debt extinguishment of $4.6 million.

6. DERIVATIVES

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on our interest bearing liabilities. We attempt to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of financial instruments such as derivatives. We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

On December 10, 2020 as a result of the Financial Restructuring, we de-designated seven of our interest rate swaps which were previously designated cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan, as the hedged forecasted transactions were no longer probable to occur during the hedged time period due to the financial restructuring as described in Note 1. As such, the Company accelerated the reclassification of a portion of the amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings which resulted in a loss of $2.8 million that was recorded within interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on December 10, 2020, the Company voluntarily de-designated the remaining 13 interest swaps that were also previously designated as cash flow hedges against the 2018 Credit Facility and 7-year Term Loan. Upon de-designation, the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balance of each of these de-designated derivatives will be separately reclassified to earnings as the originally hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Through December 10, 2020, the changes in fair value of the derivatives were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2021, we had seven total derivatives with a notional amount of $300.0 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges.

During 2022, we estimate that $6.6 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense in connection with our designated derivatives. The recognition of these amounts could be accelerated in the event that we repay amounts outstanding on the debt instruments and do not replace them with new borrowings.

Non-designated Hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and were also used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For the eleven remaining interest rate swaps that were not re-designated subsequent to December 10, 2020 and matured during 2021, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded directly in earnings as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Interest Rate Swaps

As of December 31, 2021, we had interest rate swap agreements designated in qualifying hedging relationships outstanding with a weighted average base interest rate of 2.70% on a notional amount of $300.0 million, maturing in May 2023. We originally entered into these interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the interest payments associated with our issuances of variable interest rate long term debt. The interest rate swap agreements are net settled monthly.

F-35

The following table summarizes the terms and estimated fair values of our interest rate swap derivative instruments as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 based on the year they mature. The notional values provide an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments, but do not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.


Maturity Date	Aggregate Notional Value at December 31, 2021 (in millions of dollars)		Aggregate Fair Value at December 31, 2021 (1) (in millions of dollars)			Aggregate Fair Value at December 31, 2020 (1) (in millions of dollars)			Weighted Average Interest Rate
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Interest rate Swaps
2021	N/A		N/A			$	(3.0	)	N/A
2023	$	300.0	$	(8.1	)		(17.2	)		2.70	%
Non-designated Hedges
Interest rate Swaps
2021		—		—			(3.1	)	N/A
Total	$	300.0	$	(8.1	)	$	(23.3	)		2.70	%

(1) As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, derivative valuations in their entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and we did not have any significant recurring fair value measurements related to derivative instruments using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).

The tables below present the effect of derivative financial instruments on accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and on our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:


	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative Instruments						Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Interest Expense
	Year Ended December 31,
(in millions of dollars)	2021			2020			2021		2020
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Interest rate products	$	(11.4	)	$	(21.6	)	$	11.9	$	10.4	(1)

(1)

Includes $2.8 million of accelerated reclassification of a portion of amounts in other comprehensive (loss) income to earnings.


	Year Ended December 31,
(in millions of dollars)	2021			2020
Total interest expense presented in the consolidated statements of operations in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded	$	(128.0	)	$	(84.3	)
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense	$	11.9		$	10.4

The impact of our non-designated swaps resulted in a loss of approximately $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is recognized in interest expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features

We have agreements with some of our derivative counterparties that contain a provision pursuant to which, if our entity that originated such derivative instruments defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then we could also be declared to be in default on our derivative obligations. On December 10, 2020, we amended our agreements with our derivative counterparties so that our November 1, 2020 bankruptcy filing was not considered a default under our agreements. As of December 31, 2021, we were not in default on any of our derivative obligations.

F-36

We have an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan covenant provisions of our loan agreement with a lender affiliated with the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in our being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.

8. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

Share Based Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2021, we make share based compensation awards using our Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, which is a share based compensation plan that was approved by our Board of Trustees in 2021. Previously, we maintained six other plans pursuant to which we granted equity awards in various forms. Certain restricted shares and certain options granted under these previous plans remain subject to restrictions or remain outstanding and exercisable, respectively. In addition, we previously maintained two plans pursuant to which we granted options to our non-employee trustees.

On March 31, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the 2021-2023 Equity Award Program design (the “2021 Program”) under which long term incentive awards may be made to certain key employees. Having approved the Program, the Company made long term incentive plan awards in the form of performance-based restricted share units (“2021 PSUs”) and time-based restricted share units (“2021 RSUs”). The grants of 2021 PSUs and 2021 RSUs were made pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.

On March 31, 2021 also, the Board of Trustees approved the first amendment to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan to permit the grant of time-based RSUs, and as a result, the Plan allows for settlement of RSUs or PSUs in cash or shares, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

We recognize expense in connection with share based awards made prior to 2021 to employees and trustees by valuing all share based awards at their fair value on the date of grant, and then expensing them over the applicable vesting period. Our 2021 awards, which allow for the settlement in cash or shares, are accounted for as liability awards and are remeasured at fair value each reporting period.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded aggregate compensation expense for share based awards of $4.6 million (including a net reversal of $0.1 million of amortization relating to employee separation) and $6.7 million (including a net reversal of $0.1 million of amortization relating to employee separation), respectively, in connection with the equity incentive programs described below. There was no income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share based compensation arrangements. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we capitalized compensation costs related to share based awards of less than $10 thousand and $0.1 million, respectively. For

F-37

the 2021 liability awards, as of December 31, 2021, $1.2 million of liability is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan

Subject to any future adjustments for share splits and similar events, the total remaining number of common shares that may be issued to employees or trustees under our Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (pursuant to options, restricted shares, shares issuable pursuant to current or future RSU Programs, or otherwise) was 2,381,272 as of December 31, 2021. The share based awards described in this footnote were made under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.

Restricted Shares Subject to Time Based Vesting

The aggregate fair value of the restricted shares that we granted to our employees and non-employee trustees in 2020 was $4.6 million based on the share price on the date of the grant. As of December 31, 2021, there was $1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share based compensation arrangements granted under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.

A summary of the status of our unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2021 and changes during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are presented below:


	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
January 1, 2020		938,264		$	8.67
Shares granted		1,706,624			3.22
Shares vested		(474,376	)		3.24
Shares forfeited		(93,791	)		4.96
December 31, 2020		2,076,721			5.60
Shares granted		—			—
Shares vested		(1,231,002	)		2.09
Shares forfeited		(24,342	)		4.16
December 31, 2021		821,377		$	10.90

2021 Time Based Restricted Share Units

In 2021, we made grants of 2021 RSUs subject to time based vesting. The 2021 RSUs will generally vest in three equal annual installments for all except director grants that will vest in two equal annual installments, provided the recipient remains our employee on the vesting date. During the period that the 2021 RSUs have not vested, the holder will have no rights as a shareholder with respect to the 2021 RSUs; however, dividends, if any, on the Company’s common shares are deemed to be paid with respect to 2021 RSUs and credited to the RSU. In 2021, we granted a total of 1,417,413 2021 RSUs to our employees subject to time based vesting. The weighted average grant date fair values of 2021 RSUs was $1.95 per share in 2021. The aggregate fair value of the 2021 RSUs granted in 2021 were $2.8 million. Compensation cost relating to 2021 RSUs is recorded ratably over the respective vesting periods and the fair value is remeasured at each reporting period. We recorded $0.6 million (including a net reversal of $0.01 million relating to employee separation) of compensation expense related to 2021 RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Restricted Shares Awarded to Employees

In 2020, we made grants of restricted shares subject to time based vesting. The awarded shares vest over periods of one to three years, typically in equal annual installments, provided the recipient remains our employee on the vesting date. For all grantees, the shares generally vest immediately upon death or disability. Recipients are entitled to receive an amount equal to the dividends on the shares prior to vesting. We granted a total of 1,706,624 restricted shares subject to time based vesting to our employees in 2020. The weighted average grant date fair values of time based restricted shares was $3.22 per share in 2020. The aggregate fair value of the restricted shares granted in 2020 were $3.9 million. Compensation cost relating to time based restricted share awards is recorded ratably over the respective vesting periods. We recorded $3.4 million (including a net reversal of $0.1 million relating to employee separation) of compensation expense related to time based restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2020. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $1.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

2021 CEO Time Based Restricted Share Units and Outperformance Units

In 2021, in connection with the entry into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, the Company awarded a long term incentive award of cash-settled, time-based RSUs pursuant to a Restricted Share Unit and Outperformance Unit Award Agreement to its Chief Executive Officer. The award consisted of 800,323 RSUs ("CEO RSUs") with a grant date fair value of $1.71 per share. The CEO RSUs will vest in three equal installments commencing on March 31, 2022, subject to continued employment (and to accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of

F-38

certain termination events). Vested CEO RSUs will be settled in cash equal to the fair market value of a common share on the applicable vesting date multiplied by the number of RSUs that vest on that date.

The CEO RSUs also include an “outperformance multiplier” that would entitle the recipient to the dollar value of an additional number of common shares (“CEO OPUs”) tied to a multiple of the number of RSUs if the Company’s share price achieves certain outperformance goals. Achievement of the share price goals will be measured based on the average of the closing prices of a common share for the 60 days on which common shares were traded prior to and including the last day of a measurement period ending on December 31, 2023 (or upon the occurrence of certain earlier change in control events). If any amounts are earned in respect of the CEO OPUs at the end of the measurement period, the CEO OPUs will be settled in cash based on the fair market value of a common share on the last day of the measurement period. Unless amended, the award must be settled in cash.

Outperformance Units (“OPUs”) Awarded to Employees

Of the time-based restricted shares granted to employees in 2019, 517,783 had Outperformance Units (“OPUs”) attached to them. The OPUs will entitle the employees to receive additional shares tied to a multiple of the employee’s time-based restricted share award if the Company achieves certain specified operating performance metrics measured over a three-year period. If any shares are issued in respect of the OPUs at the end of the three-year measurement period, 50% will vest immediately, 25% will be subject to an additional one-year vesting requirement, and 25% will be subject to an additional two-year vesting requirement. If we pay dividends, dividend equivalents on the common shares will accrue on any awarded OPUs and are credited to “acquire” more OPUs for the account of the employee at the 20-day average closing price per common share ending on the dividend payment date, but will vest only if performance measures were achieved as of December 31, 2021. We recorded $4.2 million and $0.1 million of compensation expense related to OPUs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Restricted Shares Awarded to Non-Employee Trustees

As part of the compensation we pay to our non-employee trustees for their service, we grant restricted shares subject to time based vesting. The awarded shares vest over a one-year period. These annual awards have been made under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. In 2021, we granted 371,070 restricted share units ("Trustee RSUs"), which vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant and will be settled in cash or shares as determined by the Compensation Committee. In 2020, we granted 613,332 restricted shares subject to time based vesting to our non-employee trustees. The weighted average grant date fair values of these awards were $2.07 per share in 2021 and $1.13 per share in 2020. The fair value for the 2021 award, which is a liability based award, is remeasured each period. The aggregate fair value of these awards granted in 2021 and 2020 were $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, based on the share price on the date of the grant. Compensation cost relating to time based restricted share awards or Trustee RSUs is recorded ratably over the respective vesting periods. We recorded $0.5 million and $0.7 million of compensation expense related to time based vesting of these non-employee trustee awards in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The total fair value of shares granted to non-employee trustees that vested was $1.0 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

We will record future compensation expense in connection with the vesting of existing time based restricted share equity awards to employees as follows:


(in thousands of dollars) For the Year Ending December 31,	Employees
2022	$	1,282
2023		141
Total	$	1,423

2021 Performance Based Restricted Share Units

In 2021, we made grants of 1,544,621 units of 2021 PSUs. Under the 2021 PSU program, the number of common shares to be issued with respect to the PSUs, if any, depends on our achievement of certain specified operating performance measures and a modification based on total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the three-year period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date of a change in control of the Company (the “Measurement Period”).

The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by the Company with respect to the 2021 PSUs awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of certain specified operating performance measures during the Measurement Period. These performance measures, the three-year core mall total occupancy and the three-year corporate debt yield, are each weighted 50%. The Committee approved minimum, target and maximum performance levels for both measures. For all participants, the minimum performance level will have a 0.5 multiplier, the target performance level will have a 1.0 multiplier and the maximum performance level will have a 2.0 multiplier. The preliminary number of common shares to be issued as determined under the operating performance goals will be adjusted, upwards or downwards, depending on the Company’s TSR performance over the Measurement Period relative to the TSR performance of other REITs comprising a leading index of REITs. Dividends, if any, on the Company’s common shares are deemed to be paid with respect to 2021 PSUs and credited to the 2021 PSU.

Compensation cost relating to 2021 PSUs is recorded ratably over the respective vesting periods but the fair value is remeasured at each reporting period. Total compensation cost recorded in 2021 was $0.3 million.

F-39

Performance Based Restricted Share Unit Programs

In 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our Board of Trustees established the 2020-2022 RSU Program, 2019-2021 RSU Program, 2018-2020 RSU Program, 2017-2019 RSU Program, 2016-2018 RSU Program, and the 2015-2017 RSU Program, respectively (collectively, the “RSU Programs”).

Under the RSU Programs, we may make awards in the form of market based performance-contingent restricted share units, or RSUs. The RSUs represent the right to earn common shares in the future depending on our performance in terms of total return to shareholders (as defined in the RSU Programs) for applicable three year periods or a shorter period ending upon the date of a change in control of the Company (each, a “Measurement Period”) relative to the total return to shareholders, as defined, for the applicable Measurement Period of companies comprising an index of real estate investment trusts (the “Index REITs”).

The 2020 RSUs represent the right to receive common shares in the future depending on the Company’s performance in the achievement of operating performance measures and a modification based on total return to shareholders. The number of common shares to be issued by the Company with respect to the 2020 RSUs awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of certain specified operating performance measures during the applicable Measurement Period. These performance measures, the three-year core mall non-anchor occupancy and the three-year fixed charge coverage ratio, are each weighted 50%. The number of common shares to be issued by the Company as determined under the operating performance goals will be adjusted, upwards or downwards, depending on the Company’s total return to shareholders, as defined, for the applicable Measurement Period relative to the performance of other real estate investment trusts comprising a leading index of retail real estate investment trusts. Unlike the RSUs awarded in 2018 and 2019, the number of shares that may be issued with respect to the 2020 RSU’s are not dependent on any absolute level of total return to shareholders. In 2019, only one half of the awarded RSUs were tied to our relative total return to shareholders compared to the Index REITs, with the other half of the RSUs being tied to our absolute level of total return to shareholders. If paid, dividends are deemed credited to the participants’ RSU accounts and are applied to “acquire” more RSUs for the account of the participants at the 20-day average price per common share ending on the dividend payment date. If earned, awards will be paid in common shares in an amount equal to the applicable percentage of the number of RSUs in the participant’s account at the end of the applicable Measurement Period.

The aggregate fair values of the RSU awards in 2020 and 2019 were determined using a Monte Carlo simulation probabilistic valuation model, and are presented in the table below. The table also sets forth the assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulations used to determine the aggregate fair values of the RSU awards in 2020 and 2019 by grant date:


(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	RSUs and assumptions by Grant Date
Grant Date:	February 24, 2020						January 29, 2019
Measurement Basis:	Core Mall Non-Anchor Occupancy			Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio			Absolute TSR RSUs			Relative TSR RSUs
RSUs granted		354,972			354,972			210,193			210,193
Aggregate fair value of shares granted	$	1,217		$	1,217		$	1,550		$	1,890
Weighted average fair value per share	$	3.43		$	3.43		$	7.38		$	8.99
Volatility		53.0	%		53.0	%		40.3	%		40.3	%
Risk free interest rate		1.35	%		1.35	%		2.58	%		2.58	%

Compensation cost relating to the RSU awards is expensed ratably over the applicable three year vesting period. We recorded $1.9 million and $2.6 million of compensation expense related to the RSU Programs for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We will record future aggregate compensation expense of $0.8 million related to the existing awards under the RSU Programs.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, no shares were issued from the 2019-2021 or 2018-2020 RSU programs because the required criteria were not met.

On March 4, 2022, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Trustees approved the 2022-2024 Equity Award program, and the Company granted 4,838,184 time based RSUs (the “2022 RSUs”) and 3,548,708 performance based PSUs (the "2022 PSUs") to employees. The 2022 RSUs will generally vest in three equal annual installments for all except director grants that will vest in two equal annual installments, provided the recipient remains our employee on the vesting date. The 2022 PSUs have a three-year measurement period that ends on December 31, 2024 or a shorter period ending upon the change in control of the Company. The 2022 PSU awards are tied to our total return to shareholders and certain Company operating performance goals.

9. LEASES

As Lessee

We have entered into ground leases for portions of the land at Springfield Town Center and Plymouth Meeting Mall. We have also entered into an office lease for our headquarters location, as well as vehicle, solar panel and equipment leases as a lessee. The initial terms of these agreements generally range from three to 40 years, with certain agreements containing extension options for up to an additional 60 years. Upon lease execution, the Company measures a liability for the present value of future lease payments over the noncancellable period of the lease and any renewal option period we are reasonably certain of exercising. Certain agreements require that we pay a portion of reimbursable expenses such as CAM, utilities, insurance and real estate taxes. These payments are not included in the calculation of the lease liability and are presented as variable lease costs.

Our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit interest rate; therefore, we estimate our incremental borrowing rate to calculate the present value of remaining lease payments. In determining our incremental borrowing rate, we considered the lease term, market interest rates and estimates regarding our implied credit rating using market data with adjustments to determine an appropriate incremental borrowing rate.

The following table presents additional information pertaining to the Company’s leases:


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2021								For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands of dollars)	Solar Panel Leases		Ground Leases		Office, equipment, and vehicle leases		Total		Solar Panel Leases		Ground Leases		Office, equipment, and vehicle leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	809	$	—	$	—	$	809	$	823	$	—	$	—	$	823
Interest on lease liabilities		242		—		—		242		280		—		—		280
Operating lease costs		—		2,155		1,493		3,648		—		1,746		1,279		3,025
Variable lease costs		—		180		149		329		—		173		191		364
Total lease costs	$	1,051	$	2,335	$	1,642	$	5,028	$	1,103	$	1,919	$	1,470	$	4,492

Other information related to leases as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:


(dollars in thousands)	2021			2020
Cash paid for the amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for finance leases	$	242		$	272
Operating cash flows used for operating leases	$	2,721		$	2,106
Financing cash flows used for finance leases	$	750		$	717
Weighted average remaining lease term-finance leases (months)		75			86
Weighted average remaining lease term-operating leases (months)		291			298
Weighted average discount rate-finance leases		4.36	%		4.35	%
Weighted average discount rate-operating leases		6.43	%		6.44	%

Future payments against lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 are as follows:


(in thousands of dollars)	Finance leases			Operating leases			Total
2022	$	988		$	2,605		$	3,593
2023		983			2,556			3,539
2024		949			2,471			3,420
2025		929			2,428			3,357
2026		925			2,429			3,354
Thereafter		1,147			48,723			49,870
Total undiscounted lease payments		5,921			61,212			67,133
Less imputed interest		(742	)		(31,672	)		(32,414	)
Total lease liabilities	$	5,179		$	29,540		$	34,719

F-41

As Lessor

As of December 31, 2021, the fixed contractual lease payments, including minimum rents and fixed CAM amounts, to be received over the next five years pursuant to the terms of noncancellable operating leases with initial terms greater than one year are included in the table below. The amounts presented assume that no leases are renewed and no renewal options are exercised. Additionally, the table does not include variable lease payments that may be received under certain leases for percentage rents or the reimbursement of operating costs, such as common area expenses, utilities, insurance and real estate taxes. These variable lease payments are recognized in the period when the applicable expenditures are incurred or, in the case of percentage rents, when the sales data is made available.


(in thousands of dollars)
For the Year Ending December 31,
2022	$	184,511
2023		165,186
2024		141,650
2025		113,672
2026		94,613
2027 and Thereafter		239,886
	$	939,518

SCHEDULE III

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE

As of December 31, 2021


(in thousands of dollars)	Initial Cost of Land		Initial Cost of Building & Improvements		Cost of Improvements Net of Retirements and Impairment Charges			Balance of Land and Land Held for Develop- ment			Balance of Building & Improvements and Construction in Progress		Accumulated Depreciation Balance		Current Encumbrance (1)		Date of Acquisition/ Construction	Life of Depre- ciation
Capital City Mall	$	11,380	$	65,575	$	61,069		$	11,325		$	126,699	$	61,580	$	—	2003		40
Cherry Hill Mall		29,938		185,611		270,201			48,610			437,140		290,965		255,791	2003		40
Cumberland Mall		8,711		43,889		32,826			9,842			75,584		36,962		39,146	2005		40
Dartmouth Mall		7,015		28,328		57,080			8,286			84,137		51,347		55,318	1998		40
Exton Square Mall		19,976		103,955		(83,277	)		15,989			24,665		14,526		—	2003		40
Francis Scott Key Mall		9,786		47,526		40,983			9,442			88,853		49,342		59,490	2003		40
Jacksonville Mall		9,188		47,139		38,714			9,913			85,128		46,540		—	2003		40
Magnolia Mall		6,229		42,302		60,364			12,588			96,307		57,520		—	1998		40
Monroe Land		262		—		(262	)		—			—		—		—	2006		10
Moorestown Mall		10,934		62,995		113,038			23,058			163,909		88,977		—	2003		40
Patrick Henry Mall		16,075		86,643		54,763			16,398			141,083		81,741		84,924	2003		40
Plymouth Meeting Mall		29,265		58,388		158,560			31,737			214,476		118,337		—	2003		40
The Mall at Prince Georges		18,156		57,686		66,317			11,805			130,354		75,567		—	1998		40
Springfield Town Center		119,912		353,551		23,651			119,911			377,203		95,571		—	2015		40
Swedes Square land		189		—		36			225			—		—		—	2004	N/A
Valley Mall		8,325		57,931		84,737			26,991			124,002		59,345		—	2003		40
Valley View Mall		5,869		46,326		(52,131	)		(826	)		890		66		27,213	2003		40
Viewmont Mall		12,505		61,519		48,560			12,605			109,979		59,046		66,718	2003		40
Willow Grove Park		26,748		131,189		112,282			39,756			230,463		120,100		148,883	2003		40
Woodland Mall		26,706		121,965		139,163			44,865			242,969		97,728		113,800	2005		40
Investment In Real Estate	$	377,169	$	1,602,518	$	1,226,674		$	452,520		$	2,753,841	$	1,405,260	$	851,283

(1) Represents mortgage principal balances outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and does not include unamortized debt costs with an aggregate balance of $1.2 million.

The aggregate cost basis and depreciated basis for federal income tax purposes of our investment in real estate was $3,106.9 million and $2,074.6 million at December 31, 2021, respectively, and $3,163.8 million and $2,180.2 million at December 31, 2020, respectively. The changes in total real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:


(in thousands of dollars)	For the Year Ended December 31,
Total Real Estate Assets:	2021			2020
Balance, beginning of year	$	3,220,337		$	3,210,926
Improvements and development		22,342			49,075
Impairment of assets		(11,474	)		—
Dispositions		(20,477	)		(39,661	)
Write-off of fully depreciated assets		(254	)		(3	)
Reclassification to held for sale		(4,113	)		—
Balance, end of year	$	3,206,361		$	3,220,337
Balance, end of year – held for sale	$	8,780		$	1,384

S-1


(in thousands of dollars)	For the Year Ended December 31,
Accumulated Depreciation:	2021			2020
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,308,427		$	1,202,722
Depreciation expense		109,930			116,369
Impairment of assets		(83	)		—
Dispositions		(12,827	)		(13,808	)
Write-off of fully depreciated assets		(254	)		(3	)
Reclassification to held for sale		67			3,147
Balance, end of year	$	1,405,260		$	1,308,427
Balance, end of year – held for sale	$	—		$	—


Pennsylvania		23-6216339
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania		19103
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $1.00 per share	PEI	New York Stock Exchange
Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share	PEIPrB	New York Stock Exchange
Series C Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share	PEIPrC	New York Stock Exchange
Series D Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share	PEIPrD	New York Stock Exchange


		Page
Forward Looking Statements		1

Summary of Risk Factors		2

PART I

Item 1.	Business	4

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	14

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	37

Item 2.	Properties	37

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	43

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	43

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	44

Item 6.	[Reserved]	44

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	45

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	69

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	71

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	71

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	71

Item 9B.	Other Information	73

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections		73

PART III

Item 10.	Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	74

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	74

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	74

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence	74

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	74

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	75
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	82


	Signatures	83

	Financial Statements


Property/Location (1)	Ownership Interest			Total Square Feet (2)		Owned Square Feet (3)		Year Built / Last Renovated	Occupancy % (4)	Anchors/Major Tenants (5)
MALLS
Capital City Mall, Camp Hill, PA		100	%		624,246		504,246	1974/2005	98.8%	JC Penney, Sportsman's Warehouse, Macy’s, Dicks Sporting Goods
Cherry Hill Mall, Cherry Hill, NJ		100	%		1,311,985		833,100	1961/2009	95.7%	JC Penney, Macy’s and Nordstrom
Cumberland Mall, Vineland, NJ		100	%		950,412		677,182	1973/2003	90.8%	Regal Cinemas, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Boscov’s, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Home Depot, and Power Warehouse
Dartmouth Mall, Dartmouth, MA		100	%		632,513		492,513	1971/2000	93.1%	Burlington, JC Penney, Macy’s, AMC, and Aldi
Exton Square Mall, Exton, PA (6)		100	%		990,145		808,945	1973/2000	50.2%	Boscov’s, Macy’s
Francis Scott Key Mall, Frederick, MD		100	%		754,231		614,898	1978/1991	93.9%	Dick's Sporting Goods, JC Penney, Macy’s, Sears
Jacksonville Mall, Jacksonville, NC		100	%		493,144		493,144	1981/2008	99.9%	Belk, JC Penney and Sears
Magnolia Mall, Florence, SC		100	%		591,794		591,794	1979/2007	99.1%	Tilt Studio, Belk, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Burlington
Moorestown Mall, Moorestown, NJ (8)		100	%		926,260		744,107	1963/2008	96.4%	Boscov’s, Regal Cinemas, HomeSense, Turn 7, Cooper University Health Care (8)
Patrick Henry Mall, Newport News, VA		100	%		717,921		433,764	1988/2005	95.7%	Dick’s Sporting Goods, Dillard’s, JC Penney and Macy’s
Plymouth Meeting Mall, Plymouth Meeting, PA (7)		100	%		917,844		917,844	1966/2009	85.2%	AMC Theater, Boscov’s, Dick's Sporting Goods, Legoland Discovery Center, Whole Foods, and Burlington
The Mall at Prince Georges, Hyattsville, MD		100	%		779,760		779,760	1959/2004	99.0%	Macy’s, and Target
Springfield Town Center, Springfield, VA (7)		100	%		1,374,187		984,202	1974/2015	91.7%	Dick’s Sporting Goods, JC Penney, Macy’s, Nordstrom Rack, Regal Cinemas, Target, and Saks OFF 5th
Valley Mall, Hagerstown, MD		100	%		827,735		827,735	1974/1999	98.2%	Dick's Sporting Goods, JC Penney, Tilt, Regal Cinemas, Onelife Fitness, and Belk
Viewmont Mall, Scranton, PA		100	%		689,226		549,425	1968/2006	98.3%	JC Penney, Dick’s Sporting Goods/ Field and Stream, HomeGoods and Macy’s
Willow Grove Park, Willow Grove, PA		100	%		1,036,006		622,885	1982/2001	97.8%	Bloomingdale’s, Macy’s, Nordstrom Rack and Sears
Woodland Mall, Grand Rapids, MI		100	%		981,772		569,551	1968/2019	88.7%	JC Penney, Macy’s, and Von Maur
Total consolidated mall properties					14,599,181		11,445,095


Property/Location (1)	Ownership Interest	Total Square Feet (2)		Owned Square Feet (3)		Year Built / Last Renovated	Occupancy % (4)	Anchors/Major Tenants (5)
MALLS
Fashion District Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA	50%		851,753		851,753	1977/2019	79.0%	Ardene, Burlington, AMC, Round 1, Shopper's World, and Primark
Lehigh Valley Mall, Allentown, PA	50%		1,192,401		985,109	1960/2008	89.1%	Apple, Barnes & Noble, Dave & Buster's, Boscov’s, JC Penney and Macy’s
Springfield Mall, Springfield, PA	50%		610,658		222,759	1974/1997	87.6%	Macy’s and Target
OTHER RETAIL
Gloucester Premium Outlets, Blackwood, NJ	25%		376,967		376,967	2015	75.8%	Nike Factory Store, and Old Navy
Metroplex Shopping Center, Plymouth Meeting, PA	50%		777,695		476,966	2001	86.0%	Barnes & Noble, Giant Food Store, Lowe’s, Ross Dress for Less, Saks off Fifth and Target
The Court at Oxford Valley, Langhorne, PA	50%		703,909		456,286	1996	96.4%	Best Buy, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Home Depot
Red Rose Commons, Lancaster, PA	50%		462,883		263,293	1998	100.0%	Barnes & Noble, Burlington, Home Depot, HomeGoods and Weis Markets
Total unconsolidated retail properties			4,976,266		3,633,133


☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Average Gross Rent	2021		2020		2019		2018		2017
Under 10,000 square feet	$	54.75	$	56.05	$	57.09	$	57.07	$	58.09
Over 10,000 square feet	$	21.70	$	20.71	$	20.79	$	21.13	$	21.17
All Non-Anchor stores	$	37.28	$	37.87	$	39.30	$	39.97	$	40.88
Anchor stores	$	5.45	$	6.84	$	5.41	$	5.05	$	5.10


Tenant Name (1)	Number of Stores (2)		GLA (2)		Percent of Total GLA (3)
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.		4		189,647		1.1	%
Ashley Homestore		1		39,793		0.2	%
Barnes & Noble, Inc.		8		237,130		1.4	%
Belk, Inc.		3		311,397		1.8	%
Best Buy Co., Inc.		6		190,153		1.1	%
BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc.		2		234,761		1.3	%
Boscov’s Department Store		5		889,229		5.1	%
Burlington Stores, Inc.		5		259,661		1.5	%
Dave & Buster’s, Inc.		4		137,738		0.8	%
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.		10		570,353		3.3	%
Dillard’s, Inc.		1		144,157		0.8	%
DSW Shoe Warehouse		5		90,418		0.5	%
H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.		13		283,070		1.6	%
The Home Depot, Inc.		3		397,322		2.3	%
Hudson's Bay Company		2		54,118		0.3	%
Copper Retail JV LLC (JC Penney)		11		1,637,355		9.4	%
Macy’s, Inc.
Macy’s		13		2,408,619
Bloomingdales		1		237,537
Total Macy’s, Inc.		14		2,646,156		15.1	%
Nordstrom, Inc.
Nordstrom		1		138,000
Nordstrom Rack		2		73,439
Total Nordstrom, Inc.		3		211,439		1.2	%
Office Depot, Inc. (OfficeMax)		2		51,509		0.3	%
Onelife Fitness		1		70,000		0.4	%
PetsMart, Inc		3		78,720		0.5	%
Cineworld Group (Regal Cinemas)		4		205,135		1.2	%
Round One Entertainment, Inc.		2		122,860		0.7	%
Ross Stores		2		60,320		0.3	%
Shopper's World		1		95,159		0.5	%
Transform Operating Stores LLC
Sears		3		414,260
Sears Appliance and Mattress Store		1		15,000
Total Transform Operating Stores LLC		4		429,260		2.5	%
The TJX Companies, Inc.
HomeGoods		3		84,076
HomeSense		1		28,486
Marshalls		2		65,004
Sierra Trading Post		1		19,089
TJ Maxx		1		27,597
Total The TJX Companies, Inc.		8		224,252		1.3	%
Target Corporation		4		656,052		3.8	%
Tilt Studio		3		171,100		1.0	%
Turn 7 Liquidations		1		121,200		0.7	%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.		7		78,828		0.5	%
Von Maur, Inc.		1		86,165		0.5	%
Weis Markets, Inc.		1		65,032		0.4	%
Whole Foods, Inc.		1		65,156		0.4	%
		145		11,104,645		63.5	%


Primary Tenant (1)	Brands	Total number of locations		Percent of PREIT’s Annualized Gross Rent (2)
Foot Locker, Inc.	Champs, Foot Locker, Footaction, Footaction Flight 23, House of Hoops by Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker		44		5.0	%
Signet Jewelers Limited	Kay Jewelers, Piercing Pagoda, Piercing Pagoda Plus, Totally Pagoda, Zale's Jewelers, Banter by Piercing Pagoda		60		3.4	%
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.	Dick's Sporting Goods, Field & Stream		11		2.9	%
Victoria's Secret & Co.	Pink, Victoria's Secret		17		2.9	%
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.	Aerie, American Eagle Outfitters		21		2.5	%
Dave & Buster's, Inc.	Dave & Buster's		4		1.9	%
Express, Inc.	Express, Express Factory Outlet, Express Men		14		1.9	%
Gap, Inc.	Banana Republic, Gap/Gap Kids/Gap Outlet/Old Navy		18		1.8	%
Cineworld Group	Regal Cinemas		4		1.7	%
Sycamore Partners	Hot Topic, Talbots, Torrid, Ann Taylor, Loft, Belk		41		1.7	%
Genesco, Inc.	Johnston & Murphy, Journey's, Journey's Kidz, Underground by Journey's		28		1.7	%
Macy's	Bloomingdale's, Macy's		14		1.7	%
Bath & Body Works, Inc.	Bath & Body Works		21		1.4	%
Darden Concepts, Inc.	Bahama Breeze, Capital Grille, Olive Garden, Seasons 52, Yard House		8		1.4	%
Luxottica Group S.p.A.	Lenscrafters, Pearle Vision, Sunglass Hut		28		1.3	%
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.	AMC		4		1.1	%
The TJX Companies, Inc.	HomeGoods, Marshalls, TJMaxx, HomeSense, Sierra Trading Post		8		1.1	%
Shoe Show, Inc.	Shoe Dept, Shoe Dept. Encore		16		1.1	%
Copper Retail JV LLC	JCPenny		11		1.0	%
Focus Brands	Cinnabon, Moe's Southwest Grill, Auntie Anne's and Jamba		33		1.0	%
Total			405		38.5	%


	All Tenants (1) (2)
(in thousands of dollars, except per square foot amounts)	Number of Leases		GLA of Expiring		PREIT’s Share of Gross Rent in Expiring		Average Expiring Gross		Percent of PREIT’s Total Gross
For the Year Ended December 31,	Expiring		Leases		Year		Rent psf		Rent
2021 and Prior		121		210,043	$	11,370	$	58.94		4.1	%
2022		249		709,512		26,687		43.95		9.6	%
2023		255		1,339,655		39,213		33.54		14.1	%
2024		235		882,447		36,517		46.34		13.2	%
2025		178		951,338		33,905		44.78		12.2	%
2026		147		829,343		28,325		42.52		10.2	%
2027		105		879,015		26,413		32.84		9.5	%
2028		82		583,373		20,410		37.45		7.4	%
2029		69		490,934		15,995		40.21		5.8	%
2030		65		496,317		17,352		41.61		6.3	%
Thereafter		68		813,039		20,970		34.56		7.6	%
Total/Average		1,574		8,185,016	$	277,157	$	39.88		100.0	%


	All Tenants
(in thousands of dollars, except per square foot amounts)	Number of Leases		GLA of Expiring		PREIT’s Share of Gross Rent in Expiring		Average Expiring Gross		Percent of PREIT’s Total
For the Year Ending December 31,	Expiring		Leases		Year (1)(2)		Rent psf		Gross Rent
2021 and Prior (2)		1		164,694	$	202	$	2.46		0.8	%
2022		1		212,000		152		1.44		0.6	%
2023		5		550,775		2,446		4.44		9.4	%
2024		4		485,531		3,264		6.72		12.5	%
2025		9		1,181,974		3,211		2.72		12.3	%
2026		6		470,638		2,646		8.31		10.1	%
2027		2		275,250		1,743		6.33		6.7	%
2028		8		879,599		5,633		6		21.5	%
2029		1		65,155		2,210		33.92		8.5	%
2030		2		85,718		1,522		17.75		5.8	%
Thereafter		5		407,850		3,121		7.65		11.8	%
Total/Average		44		4,779,184	$	26,150	$	5.81		100.0	%


	Pre-bankruptcy								Units Closed
Year	Number of Tenants (1)		Number of locations impacted		GLA (2)		PREIT’s Share of Annualized Gross Rent (3) (in thousands)		Number of locations closed		GLA (2)		PREIT’s Share of Annualized Gross Rent (3) (in thousands)
2021
Consolidated properties		5		10		331,314	$	1,589		5		18,344	$	380
Unconsolidated properties		1		1		4,046		57		1		4,046		57
Total		5		11		335,360		1,646		6		22,390		437

2020
Consolidated properties		17		91		2,068,153	$	18,604		39		389,696	$	6,771
Unconsolidated properties		18		31		468,164		3,747		13		162,378		2,093
Total		23		122		2,536,317		22,351		52		552,074		8,864


	Occupancy (1) as of December 31,
	Consolidated Properties						Unconsolidated Properties						Combined (2)
	2021			2020			2021			2020			2021			2020
Retail portfolio weighted average:
Total excluding anchors		89.5	%		88.4	%		83.4	%		83.4	%		87.7	%		86.9	%
Total including anchors		91.6	%		88.1	%		86.5	%		83.9	%		90.4	%		87.1	%
Core Malls weighted average: (3)
Total excluding anchors		91.8	%		90.4	%		79.1	%		81.2	%		89.5	%		89.4	%
Total including anchors		94.8	%		90.7	%		84.7	%		87.1	%		93.2	%		90.3	%



21*		Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1*		Consent of KPMG LLP (Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm).

24*		Power of Attorney (included on signature page to this Form 10-K).

31.1*		Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.INS).


	Number		GLA		Term (in years)		Initial Rent psf		Previous Rent psf		Initial Gross Rent Spread (1)						Avg Rent Spread (2)			Annualized Tenant Improvements psf (3)
Non-Anchor											$			%			%
New Leases
Under 10,000 sf		138		305,375		4.7	$	42.88	$	—	$	—			—	%		—	%	$	5.50
Over 10,000 sf		9		256,503		15.7		8.10		—		—			—	%		—	%		1.08
Total New Leases		147		561,878		9.7		27.00		—		—			—	%		—	%		2.25
Renewal Leases
Under 10,000 sf		144		280,989		3.5		59.98		66.11		(6.14	)		(9.3	%)		(6.2	)%		-
Over 10,000 sf		13		507,033		4.4		15.97		14.50		1.47			10.1	%		12.1	%		0
Total Fixed Rent		157		788,022		4.0		31.66		32.90		(1.24	)		(3.8	)%		(0.9	)%		0.01
Percentage in Lieu		64		290,096		1.6		22.24		24.73		(2.49	)		(10.1	)%					0.05
Total Renewal Leases		221		1,078,118		3.4		29.13	$	30.71	$	(1.58	)		(5.1	)%				$	0.02
Total Non Anchor (4)		368		1,639,996		5.6	$	28.40
Anchor
New Leases		4		409,684		6.1	$	3.40												$	0.95
Renewal Leases		6		690,850		4.5		5.51	$	5.61	$	(0.10	)		(1.8	)%		—	%		—
Total Anchor		10		1,100,534		5.1	$	4.72


(in thousands of dollars)	For the Year Ended December 31, 2021			% Change 2020 to 2021			For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
Results of operations:
Real estate revenue	$	295,869			13	%	$	260,936
Property operating expenses		(127,582	)		1	%		(126,898	)
Other income		561			(37	)%		887
Depreciation and amortization		(117,986	)		(7	)%		(126,362	)
General and administrative expenses		(49,570	)		(1	)%		(50,272	)
Provision for employee separation expenses		(305	)		(75	)%		(1,227	)
Insurance recoveries, net		669			14	%		586
Project costs and other expenses		(309	)		5	%		(294	)
Interest expense, net		(128,031	)		52	%		(84,341	)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, net		4,587			(408	)%		(1,487	)
Gain on derecognition of property		—			(100	)%		8,127
Impairment of assets		(9,938	)	N/A				—
Reorganization expenses		(267	)		(93	)%		(3,769	)
Equity in (loss) of partnerships		(3,732	)		(33	)%		(5,544	)
(Loss) on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee		—			(100	)%		(148,545	)
Gain on sales of real estate by equity method investee		1,337		N/A				—
Gain on sales of interests in real estate, net		(1,180	)		(110	)%		11,444
Gains on sales of non-operating real estate		10			(81	)%		54
Net loss	$	(135,867	)		(49	)%	$	(266,706	)


	Same Store				Non Same Store						Total (non-GAAP)
(in thousands of dollars)	2021		2020		2021			2020			2021		2020
NOI from consolidated properties	$	167,694	$	132,264	$	594		$	1,774		$	168,288	$	134,038
NOI from equity method investments at ownership share		32,178		24,564		(7	)		(7	)		32,171		24,557
Total NOI		199,872		156,828		587			1,767			200,459		158,595
Less: lease termination revenue		4,491		2,262		138			6			4,629		2,268
Total NOI - excluding lease termination revenue	$	195,381	$	154,566	$	449		$	1,761		$	195,830	$	156,327


	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2021			% Change 2020 to 2021	2020
Net loss	$	(135,867	)		$	(266,706	)
Depreciation and amortization on real estate:
Consolidated properties		116,646				124,940
PREIT’s share of equity method investments		13,577				16,641
Loss (gain) on sales of real estate, net		1,180				(11,444	)
Impairment of real estate assets		10,202				—
Gain on sales of real estate by equity method investee		(1,337	)			—
Loss on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee		—				148,545
Dividends on preferred shares (1)		—				(13,687	)
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders		4,401		357.2%		(1,711	)
Provision for employee separation expense		305				1,227
Insurance recoveries, net		(669	)			(586	)
Reorganization expenses		267				3,769
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		(4,587	)			1,487
Gain on derecognition of property		—				(8,127	)
(Gain) loss on hedge ineffectiveness		(2,735	)			2,912
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted	$	(3,018	)	(193.3)%	$	(1,029	)
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and OP Unit	$	0.05		352.6%	$	(0.02	)
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders and OP Unit holders, as adjusted, per diluted share and OP Unit	$	(0.04	)	(188.1)%	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		78,595				77,227
Weighted average effect of full conversion of OP Units		1,548				2,012
Effect of common share equivalents		943				380
Total weighted average shares outstanding, including OP Units		81,086				79,619


	Payments by Period
(in thousands of dollars)	Total		2022		2023		2024		2025-2026		Thereafter
Consolidated mortgage loans
Principal payments	$	31,050	$	13,652	$	6,587	$	6,405	$	4,406	$	—
Balloon payments (1)(2)(3)		821,823		429,493		53,299		127,685		211,346		—
Total consolidated mortgage loans		852,873	$	443,145	$	59,886	$	134,090	$	215,752	$	—
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs		1,590
Carrying value of mortgage notes payable	$	851,283


	Fixed Rate Debt					Variable Rate Debt
(in thousands of dollars) For the Year Ending December 31,	Principal Payments		Weighted Average Interest Rate			Principal Payments			Weighted Average Interest Rate (1)
2022	$	42,672		4.01	%	$	191,322			2.27	%
2023	$	302,729		3.96	%	$	1,043,862	(2)		7.33	%
2024	$	59,697		3.99	%	$	—			—
2025	$	6,405		4.03	%	$	—			—
2026 and thereafter	$	215,752		4.04	%	$	—			—


(1) Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP, Philadelphia, PA PCAOB ID: 185)		F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020		F-6

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020		F-8

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020		F-9

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020		F-10

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-11

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation		S-1


2.1		Contribution Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2014, by and among Franconia Two, L.P., PR Springfield Town Center LLC, PREIT Associates, L.P. and Vornado Realty L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference.

2.2		Confirmation Order for Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of Its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries (with Additional Technical Modifications as of November 20, 2020), filed as Exhibit 2.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.1		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated December 18, 2008, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.2		Amendment, dated June 7, 2012, to Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust dated December 18, 2008, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.3		Amendment to Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated December 18, 2008, as amended, dated as of March 30, 2020, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.4		By-laws of PREIT (as amended through March 31, 2020), filed as Exhibit 3.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.5		Designating Amendment to Trust Agreement designating the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of PREIT’s 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.01 per share, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on April 20, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.6		Second Designating Amendment to Trust Agreement designating the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of PREIT’s 7.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.01 per share, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on October 11, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

3.7		Third Designating Amendment to Trust Agreement designating the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of PREIT’s 7.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.01 per share, filed as Exhibit 3.4 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on January 27, 2017, is incorporated by reference.

3.8		Fourth Designating Amendment to Trust Agreement designating the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of PREIT’s 6.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.01 per share, filed as Exhibit 3.5 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on September 11, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.1		First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated September 30, 1997, of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 4.15 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 1997, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.2		First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated July 15, 1998, of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 4.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 1998, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.3		Second Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated July 15, 1998, of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 4.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 1998, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.4		Third Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated October 13, 1998, of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 4.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 1998, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.5		Fourth Amendment to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated May 13, 2003, of PREIT Associates L.P., filed as Exhibit 4.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.6		Addendum to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PREIT Associates, L.P. designating the rights, obligations, duties and preferences of Series A Preferred Units, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.7		Second Addendum to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PREIT Associates, L.P. designating the rights, obligations, duties and preferences of the Series B Preferred Units, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.8		Third Addendum to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PREIT Associates, L.P. designating the rights, obligations, duties and preferences of the Series C Preferred Units, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.9		Fourth Addendum to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of PREIT Associates, L. P. designating the rights, obligations, duties and preferences of the Series D Preferred Units, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on form 8-K filed on September 11, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.10		Form of share certificate evidencing the 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on April 20, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.11		Form of share certificate evidencing the 7.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on October 11, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.


4.12		Form of share certificate evidencing the 7.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on January 27, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.13		Form of share certificate evidencing the 6.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, filed as Exhibit 4.4 to PREIT’s Form 8-A filed on September 11, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

4.14		Description of Registrant’s Securities, filed as Exhibit 4.15 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.1		Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2018 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.2		Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of May 24, 2018 in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.3		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2018, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, dated as of March 31, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.4		Letter Agreement executed by Wells Fargo, National Association amending 7-Year Term Loan and 2018 Credit Agreement, dated May 1, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 21, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.
10.5		Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2018, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial parties thereto, dated as of July 27, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference
10.6		Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2018, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto, dated as of September 30, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.7		Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 8, 2014 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.8		Seven-Year Term Loan Guaranty dated as of January 8, 2014 in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of PREIT Associates, L.P, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.9		First Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of November 3, 2014 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.10		Second Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of November 12, 2014 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.11		Third Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 26, 2015 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.12		Fourth Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 30, 2016 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 28, 2016, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.13		Fifth Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 5, 2018 by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT and the financial institutions party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 3, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.
10.14		Sixth Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 8, 2014, as amended, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT, and the financial institutions party thereto, dated as of March 30, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.
10.15		Seventh Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 8, 2014, as amended, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto, dated as of July 27, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.
10.16		Eighth Amendment to Seven-Year Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 8, 2014, as amended, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto, dated as of September 30, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.


10.17		Credit Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 14, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.18		First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, dated as of September 30, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.



10.19		Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, dated as of October 16, 2020, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.20		Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.21		Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of December 10, 2020, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT-RUBIN OP, Inc., and certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.22		Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.23		Guaranty, dated as of December 10, 2020, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., PREIT-RUBIN OP, Inc., and certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.4 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.24		First Amendment to Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2021, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.25		Repayment Guaranty, dated as of January 22, 2018, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.5 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.26		Guaranty Reaffirmation, dated as of December 10, 2020, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, executed by PREIT Associates, L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.6 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.27		Agency Resignation, Appointment, Acceptance, and Waiver Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2021, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.28		Agency Resignation, Appointment, Acceptance and Waiver Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2021 filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.29		Promissory Note, dated August 15, 2012, in the principal amount of $150.0 million, issued by Cherry Hill Center, LLC and PR Cherry Hill STW LLC in favor of New York Life Insurance Company, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.30		Promissory Note, dated August 15, 2012, in the principal amount of $150.0 million, issued by Cherry Hill Center, LLC and PR Cherry Hill STW LLC in favor of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 26, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.31		Forbearance Agreement, effective as of July 1, 2020, by and among PR Cherry Hill STW LLC, Cherry Hill Center, LLC, PREIT Associates, L.P., New York Life Insurance Company and Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of America, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.32		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of April 25, 2012 by and between PREIT and Joseph F. Coradino, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.33		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of May 12, 2021, by and between PREIT and Joseph F. Coradino, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.34		Restricted Share Unit and Outperformance Unit Award Agreement with Joseph F. Coradino, dated as of May 12, 2021, filed as Exhibit 10.2 on PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.35		Amended and Restated Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated as of June 7, 2012 by and between PREIT and Joseph F. Coradino, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.36		First Amendment to the Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated as of August 9, 2021, by and between PREIT and Joseph F. Coradino, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.37		Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2020, between PREIT and Mario C. Ventresca, Jr., filed as Exhibit 99.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on March 9, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.38		Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2021, by and between PREIT and Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.39		Letter Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2013 by and between PREIT Services, LLC and Andrew M. Ioannou, filed as Exhibit 10.70 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.


+10.40		Letter Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2017 by and between PREIT Services, LLC and Lisa M. Most, filed as Exhibit 10.21 to PREIT’s Annual report on Form 10-K filed February 25, 2019 is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.41		Letter Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2013 by and between PREIT Services, LLC and Joseph J. Aristone, filed as Exhibit 10.46 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed March 28, 2019 is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.42		Letter Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between PREIT Services, LLC and Heather Crowell, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to Amendment No. 1 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed March 28, 2019 is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.43		Amended and Restated Employee Share Purchase Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.44		PREIT’s Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.45		Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.46		Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement under PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.47		Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement under PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 4, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.48		PREIT’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.49		2018-2020 Restricted Share Unit Program, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 4, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.50		Form of 2018-2020 Restricted Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 4, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.51		2019-2021 Equity Award Program, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.52		Form of 2019-2021 Restricted Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.53		Form of Restricted Share and Outperformance Unit Award Agreement under PREIT’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.54		Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement under PREIT’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.55		2020-2022 Equity Award Program, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 21, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.56		Form of 2020-2022 Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 21, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.57		Form of 2020-2022 Restricted Share Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 21, 2020 is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.58		Amended and Restated Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.59		Amendment No. 1 to the Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.60		Form of Restricted Share Award Notice under the Amended and Restated Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.61		2021-2023 Equity Award Program, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.62		Form of Restricted Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.


+10.63		Form of Performance Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K filed on May 7, 2021, is herein incorporated by reference.

+10.64		Form of 2021 Restricted Share Unit and Dividend Equivalent Rights Award Notice, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2021, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.65		Lease between PREIT Associates, L.P. and Commerce Square Partners – Philadelphia Plaza, L.P., dated December 3, 2018, filed as Exhibit 10.51 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.66		First Amendment to Office Lease between PREIT Associates, L.P. and Commerce Square Partners – Philadelphia Plaza, L.P., dated September 27, 2019, filed as Exhibit 10.52 to PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.67		Tax Protection Agreement, dated March 31, 2015, between PREIT Associates, L.P., PR Springfield Town Center LLC, Franconia Two, L.P., and Vornado Realty L.P., filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference.

+10.68		PREIT Services, LLC Severance Pay Plan for Certain Officers, effective January 1, 2007, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 18, 2017, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.69		Restructuring Support Agreement, dated October 7, 2020, by and among Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and the other parties thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.
10.70		Amendment and Waiver to Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.71		Second Amendment to Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2020, by and among PREIT Associates, L.P., PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, and the financial institutions party thereto and their assignees, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to PREIT’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.72		Notice of (I) Entry of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Approving the Adequacy of the Debtors’ Disclosure Statement for, and Confirming, the Debtors’ Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of Its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries and (II) Occurrence of Effective Date, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to PREIT’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.


		PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

Date:	March 15, 2022	By:	/s/ Joseph F. Coradino
			Joseph F. Coradino
			Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Name	Capacity	Date

/s/ Joseph F. Coradino	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Trustee	March 15, 2022
Joseph F. Coradino

/s/ Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)	March 15, 2022
Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

/s/ Sathana Semonsky	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)	March 15, 2022
Sathana Semonsky

/s/ George J. Alburger, Jr.	Trustee	March 15, 2022
George J. Alburger, Jr.

/s/ Michael J. DeMarco	Trustee	March 15, 2022
Michael J. DeMarco

/s/ JoAnne A. Epps	Trustee	March 15, 2022
JoAnne A. Epps

/s/ Mark E. Pasquerilla	Trustee	March 15, 2022
Mark E. Pasquerilla

/s/ Charles P. Pizzi	Trustee	March 15, 2022
Charles P. Pizzi

/s/ John J. Roberts	Trustee	March 15, 2022
John J. Roberts


	For The Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)	2021			2020
Net loss	$	(135,867	)	$	(266,706	)
Noncontrolling interest		3,130			7,189
Cumulative preferred share dividends		(27,375	)		(27,375	)
Dividends on unvested restricted shares		—			(363	)
Net loss used to calculate earnings per share – basic and diluted	$	(160,112	)	$	(287,255	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(2.04	)	$	(3.72	)

(in thousands of shares)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		78,595			77,227
Effect of dilutive common share equivalents (1)		—			—
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		78,595			77,227


				PREIT Shareholders
				Preferred Shares $.01 par
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)	Total Equity			Series B		Series C		Series D		Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1.00 par			Capital Contributed in Excess of par			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Distributions in Excess of Net Income			Non- controlling interest
Balance January 1, 2020	$	427,425		$	35	$	69	$	50	$	77,550		$	1,766,883		$	(12,556	)	$	(1,408,352	)	$	3,746
Net loss		(266,706	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(259,517	)		(7,189	)
Other comprehensive income		(8,359	)		—		—		—		—			—			(8,064	)		—			(295	)
Shares issued upon redemption of Operating Partnership units		(28	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			(28	)
Shares issued under employee compensation plan, net of shares retired		133			—		—		—		1,987			(1,854	)		—			—			—
Amortization of deferred compensation		6,748			—		—		—		—			6,748			—			—			—
Dividends paid to Series B preferred shareholders ($0.9218 per share)		(3,182	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(3,182	)		—
Dividends paid to Series C preferred shareholders ($0.90 per share)		(6,210	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(6,210	)		—
Dividends paid to Series D preferred shareholders ($0.8594 per share)		(4,296	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(4,296	)		—
Dividends paid to common shareholders ($0.23 per share)		(18,081	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(18,081	)		—
Noncontrolling interests:
Distributions paid to Operating Partnership unit holders ($0.23 per unit)		(504	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			(504	)
Balance December 31, 2020		126,940			35		69		50		79,537			1,771,777			(20,620	)		(1,699,638	)		(4,270	)
Net loss		(135,867	)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(132,737	)		(3,130	)
Other comprehensive income		12,010			—		—		—		—			—			11,790			—			220
Shares issued upon redemption of Operating Partnership units		—			—		—		—		940			1,035			—			—			(1,975	)
Shares issued under employee compensation plan, net of shares retired		(647	)		—		—		—		(277	)		(370	)		—			—			—
Amortization of deferred compensation		4,571			—		—		—		—			4,571			—			—			—
Noncontrolling interests:
Other distributions to noncontrolling interest, net		40			—		—		—		—			—			—			—			40
Balance December 31, 2021	$	7,047		$	35	$	69	$	50	$	80,200		$	1,777,013		$	(8,830	)	$	(1,832,375	)	$	(9,115	)


	For the Year Ended
(in thousands of dollars)	December 31, 2021
Exton Square Mall	$	8,374
Valley View Center		1,302
Monroe Marketplace		262
Total Impairment of Assets	$	9,938