UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

————————

Form 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

(Mark One)

Commission File Number: 001-37509

DASEKE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(972) 248-0412

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

* On February 23, 2022, NASDAQ Stock Market LLC filed a Form 25 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to delist Daseke, Inc.’s warrants from NASDAQ due to the expiration of the warrants on February 27, 2022; each warrant not exercised on or before the expiration date became void. The deregistration of the warrants under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, will be effective 90 days, or such shorter period as the SEC may determine, after the filing of the Form 25.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

————————

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No 

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last sales price as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market as of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $291.8 million.

62,566,133 shares of common stock were outstanding as of February 18, 2022.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment No. 1”) amends our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Original Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 23, 2022 (the “Original Filing Date”). The sole purpose of this Amendment No. 1 is to include the information required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of Form 10-K. This information was previously omitted from the Original Report in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, which permits the information in the above referenced items to be incorporated in the Form 10-K by reference from our definitive proxy statement if such statement is filed no later than 120 days after our fiscal year-end. We are filing this Amendment No. 1 to include Part III information in our Form 10-K because we will not file a definitive proxy statement containing such information within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by the Original Report. The reference on the cover of the Original Report to the incorporation by reference to portions of our definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Report is hereby deleted.

Table of Contents

DASEKE, INC.

2021 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A

INDEX

Table of Contents

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors

The directors of the Company are as follows:

Charles “Chuck” F. Serianni has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) since May 2019 and as Chairman of the Board since June 2021. Mr. Serianni served as the Special Advisor to the CEO of Republic Services, Inc. (NYSE: RSG), a national provider of recycling, solid waste and environmental services (“Republic Services”), from June 2020 until his retirement in June 2021. Prior to that role, Mr. Serianni served Republic Services as the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer from August 2014 to June 2020 and Vice President and Controller, West Region from July 2013 to August 2014. He also served Republic Services as Assistant Controller and progressed to Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of Republic Services during the period from June 1998 to July 2013 and as Accounting Operations Director of Republic Services (Auto Nation) from 1997 to 1998. Prior to his work with Republic Services, Mr. Serianni served as Accounting Operations Director for Sunglass Hut International, Inc. and as a Manager, Accounting and Auditing Services for Deloitte & Touche LLP, an international accounting firm. Mr. Serianni holds a bachelor’s degree in Accounting and Finance from the University of Dayton and he is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Serianni brings extensive experience in overseeing the strategic development of complex corporations, as well as experience overseeing effective cyber and technology systems and protocols. We believe his background and skill set make Mr. Serianni well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Brian Bonner has served as a member of the Board of Directors since February 2015. From August 2020 to June 2021, he served as Chairman of the Board, and from August 2019 to August 2020, he served as Executive Chairman. Previously, Mr. Bonner served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Texas Instruments, a publicly traded company, from January 2000 to May 2014. In this role, Mr. Bonner managed the company’s business processes and technology and was a member of the company’s strategy leadership team. Prior to being appointed Chief Information Officer, Mr. Bonner served Texas Instruments for over 33 years in a number of strategic leadership roles and positions in product management, worldwide marketing and acquisition integration. Mr. Bonner served as a member on the board of directors of Copper Mobile from June 2012 through October 2015 and is currently an advisory board member for Southern Methodist University’s Computer & Electrical Engineering Department. Mr. Bonner also served as an advisory board member for Gemini Israel Funds from June 2004 to May 2015. Mr. Bonner holds an M.B.A. in Marketing and Finance from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, an MSEE and BSEE from the University of Michigan, and a B.A. in Physics from Kalamazoo College. He received the Minority & Women Business Development Award from Texas Instruments, the Transformational CIO Award from HMG Strategies and the Most Innovative User of Technology from Information Week Magazine. We believe his background and skill set make Mr. Bonner well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

1

Table of Contents

Don R. Daseke has served as a member of the Board of Directors since he founded the Company (formerly named Walden Smokey Point, Inc.) in November 2008. From November 2008 until his retirement in August 2019, when he was appointed as the Company’s Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Daseke was the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. He also served as President of Daseke from November 2008 until January 2018. In addition, Mr. Daseke has served as the President and sole director on the board of directors of The Walden Group for more than 30 years. Mr. Daseke also has served as the chairman of the board of directors of both Liquid Motors, Inc. and East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. since June 2005 and March 2006, respectively. Mr. Daseke has been active in the non-profit sector throughout his career, having served in leadership roles for a number of non-profit institutions, including the WaterTower Theatre, DePauw University, the Dallas Chapter of the World Presidents Organization and the Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Society. Additionally, Mr. Daseke currently serves on the Advisory Council for the Cattle Barons Ball in Dallas, Texas. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Daseke was a Commissioner on the Planning and Zoning Commission for Addison, Texas, and in May 2009, he was elected to a two-year term on the Addison Town Council. Mr. Daseke served as Mayor Pro Tempore of Addison, Texas in 2010. Mr. Daseke was the Regional Winner of the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award in 2014, and in April 2018, he was inducted into the Horatio Alger Association for Distinguished Americans. Mr. Daseke holds a B.A. from DePauw University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, and completed the Presidents Program in Leadership from the Harvard Business School. Mr. Daseke is a Certified Public Accountant (retired). We believe his background and skill set make Mr. Daseke well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Catharine Ellingsen has served as a member of the Board of Directors since April 2021. Ms. Ellingsen has been the Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer, Corporate Secretary of Republic Services, a national provider of recycling, solid waste and other environmental services, since June 2016. In such capacity, she oversees Legal Services, Board and Corporate Governance, Ethics and Compliance, Enterprise Risk Management, Labor Relations, Corporate Security, Business Continuity, Real Estate and Facilities Management. Additionally, Ms. Ellingsen is Chair of the Republic Services MOSAIC Council for inclusion and diversity, Executive Sponsor of the Women of Republic Business Resource Group and a Director of the Republic Services Charitable Foundation. She previously served Republic Services as SVP, Human Resources from 2011 to June 2016 and VP, Deputy General Counsel from 2008 to 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Ellingsen served Allied Waste Industries, Inc. in a variety of roles, including VP, Deputy General Counsel and Director, Labor Relations, and practiced law at the law firms of Steptoe & Johnson LLP and Bryan Cave LLP. Since 2011, Ms. Ellingsen has served on the board of directors of Nebraska Distributing Company, including as chairperson since 2016, and since 2008, she has served on the board of directors of Bunker Hill Group. Ms. Ellingsen holds a B.A. from Wheaton College and a J.D. from Washington College of Law, The American University. She also attended the Advanced Human Resources Executive Program at the University of Michigan, Ross School of Business. We believe her background and skill set make Ms. Ellingsen well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Grant Garbers has served as a member of the Board of Directors since January 2021. Mr. Garbers has been a Managing Director of Harrison Co., a middle-market investment banking firm, since June 2020, where he is responsible for sourcing merger and acquisition opportunities as well as advising on the transaction strategy, company positioning, buyer rationale, financing risks, transaction structure, and valuation and the purchase documents in conjunction with legal counsel. Before that, Mr. Garbers spent the past 13 years with Capstone Headwaters and its predecessor company Headwaters MB as a Managing Director in its Industrial Technology Practice with the same responsibilities. Mr. Garbers has served both private and public companies across diverse industries such as transportation, medical, consumer products and industrial technology. Mr. Garbers started his career in risk management at Fred S. James before entering the financial services sector. Mr. Garbers served as an independent director of Roadmaster Group, Inc. from 2010 to December 2017 when it was acquired by the Company. Mr. Garbers holds a B.B.A. degree from The University of Georgia and completed the Mergers and Acquisitions Executive Education Program at the Wharton School of Business. We believe his background and skill set make Mr. Garbers well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

2

Table of Contents

Melendy Lovett has served as a member of the Board of Directors since January 2022. Ms. Lovett most recently served in executive roles at Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE: TRN), a publicly traded industrial and manufacturing company serving the rail transportation industry (“Trinity”), where she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from March 2014 to February 2019 and again from April 2020 to June 2021 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2019 to April 2020. Strategic projects she led at Trinity include corporate integration of its largest acquisition, the spin-off of its infrastructure business, a major organizational redesign following the spin-off and many technology upgrade implementations. Ms. Lovett also had operational responsibility for Trinity’s Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group as well as Trinity’s trucking and logistics business. Prior to her executive roles with Trinity, Ms. Lovett served the company as a director on the Audit Committee and as chairperson of the Human Resources Committee. Prior to joining Trinity, Ms. Lovett spent more than 20 years at Texas Instruments, holding roles that included Vice President of Human Resources where she was responsible for liaising with the board of directors on executive compensation, as well as 10 years as President of the company’s global education technology business. Ms. Lovett holds a bachelor’s degree in Management from Texas A&M University and a master’s degree in Accounting from the University of Texas at Dallas. She is a Certified Public Accountant in the state of Texas. Ms. Lovett was identified and recommended as a potential board candidate by a non-management director of the Company in light of her skills and experience and the Company’s needs, which included the desire for an additional financial expert. We believe her background and skill set make Ms. Lovett well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Jonathan Shepko has served as a member of the Board of Directors since February 2017 and has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since August 2021. From January 2021 to August 2021, he served as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Shepko is a Co-founder and Managing Partner of Stonehollow Capital Partners (“Stonehollow”), which makes direct equity investments in private companies across the United States. Prior to founding Stonehollow in January 2019, from 2014 to 2018, Mr. Shepko served as a Managing Partner of EF Capital Management, LP, the investment arm of a substantial single-family office, which largely focused on direct equity and direct debt investments, in both public and private companies, across the United States. Prior to that, Mr. Shepko was a Managing Director with Ares Management, a Managing Director of CLG Energy Finance (an affiliate of Beal Bank), and a Vice President with EnCap Investments, LP. Over the course of his career, he has served in various board and management capacities of portfolio company investments. Collectively, Mr. Shepko has underwritten and managed nearly $2 billion in direct equity and debt financings, spanning multiple industries, including investments in high-growth, as well as mature companies. Mr. Shepko graduated magna cum laude with a degree in Finance from Texas A&M University. We believe his background and skill set, as well as his daily insight into our business as our Chief Executive Officer, make Mr. Shepko well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Ena Williams has served as a member of the Board of Directors since May 2019. Ms. Williams has served as the Chief Operating Officer of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASY), a Fortune 500 company operating over 2,400 convenience stores in 16 states, since June 2020. Prior to this, from January 2019 to March 2020, she served as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors of National HME, Inc., a technology enabled hospice medical equipment provider. Prior to that role, she served 7-Eleven, Inc., a global chain of convenience stores, as the Senior Vice President and Head of International Operations from 2015 to February 2018, where she led the growth strategy and had P&L responsibilities for more than 34,900 licensed, franchised and joint-venture stores in 16 countries. She also served 7-Eleven, Inc. as the Senior Vice President, West Region Operations from 2011 to 2015 and the Vice President, Southwest Division from 2008 to 2011. Also, Ms. Williams held a number of positions in the operations, retail and planning functions of Mobil Oil Corporation and ExxonMobil Corporation from 1991 to 2008. Ms. Williams currently serves on the board of advisors for the Robert B. Rowling Center for Business Law & Leadership, SMU Dedman School of Law. She also serves on the board of directors for Children International. Ms. Williams holds a master’s degree in Business Administration from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a bachelor’s degree in Economics and African-American Studies from the University of Virginia. Ms. Williams brings to the Board deep experience managing P&L, executing strategic initiatives and providing data-driven analysis at large corporations across multiple industries with a focus on efficient operations and people leadership. We believe her background and skill set make Ms. Williams well-suited to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

3

Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Jonathan Shepko’s biographical information is set forth under “—Directors” above.

Jason Bates has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2020. Before joining the Company, Mr. Bates most recently served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of USA Truck Inc., a North American truckload carrier and logistics brokerage provider, a position he had held since May 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Bates served Swift Transportation Company, a transportation services company (“Swift”), as Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations Officer from December 2010 to April 2017 and in a variety of other finance, treasury and accounting roles from 2003 to 2010. Mr. Bates began his career in corporate finance at Honeywell International in the Aerospace Division. Mr. Bates holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from Brigham Young University and an MBA from Arizona State University.

Rick Williams has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2020. From 1992 until his appointment as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Mr. Williams served as Chief Executive Officer of Central Oregon Truck Company, Inc. (“COTC”), a flatbed transportation company that Mr. Williams co-founded in 1992, which was acquired by the Company in 2013. In September 2019, Mr. Williams was named the division head of the Company’s Flatbed Solutions segment. Mr. Williams began his career in the flatbed trucking industry as a driver at the age of 20. He has worked in the trucking industry for over 34 years and has served in every operational role within the industry.

Soumit Roy has served as our General Counsel since he joined the Company in September 2017 and also became our Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in September 2019 and an Executive Vice President in April 2020. Mr. Roy brings over 17 years of experience in private practice and in-house counsel positions at Fortune 500 publicly traded companies. Prior to joining Daseke, he was Global Transaction Counsel at Whole Foods Market, General Counsel at Hotels.com, an Expedia Company, and Counsel at Texas Instruments. His private practice experience includes mergers and acquisitions, corporate securities, employment law and intellectual property law. Mr. Roy holds a B.S. in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry from the University of Texas at Austin and a J.D. from The University of Texas School of Law.

Board Representation Agreements

The Lyons Agreement

On December 23, 2020, the Company entered into a board representation agreement (the “Lyons Agreement”) with Lyons Capital, LLC, The Lyons Community Property Trust, dated June 15, 1979 and Phillip N. Lyons (collectively with their respective affiliates, the “Lyons Investors”) and Mr. Garbers. The Lyons Investors beneficially owned approximately 5% of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), in the aggregate as of the date of the Lyons Agreement. Pursuant to the Lyons Agreement, the Board appointed Mr. Garbers to the Board and to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board (the “Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee”), effective January 1, 2021.

Also pursuant to the Lyons Agreement, prior to the Lyons Termination Date (as defined below), the Company will, with respect to any annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders include Mr. Garbers or any replacement representative mutually agreed upon by the Company and the Lyons Investors pursuant to the Lyons Agreement (the “Lyons Investor Representative”) in its proxy materials as a director nominee proposed by the Board, recommend the Lyons Investor Representative’s election to the Company’s stockholders and solicit proxies in favor of the Lyons Investor Representative’s election.

4

Table of Contents

With certain exceptions relating to breaches of the Lyons Agreement, the Lyons Agreement terminates after the Company or the Lyons Investors deliver a notice of termination at any time after the date of the Company’s second annual meeting of stockholders following the date of the Lyons Agreement (the “Earliest Lyons Termination Date”), subject to the terminating party providing at least 30 days’ advance notice (the effective date of such termination, the “Lyons Termination Date”). However, if the Company notifies the Lyons Investors and the Lyons Investor Representative before the Earliest Lyons Termination Date that the Board will re-nominate the Lyons Investor Representative at the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders, then the Earliest Lyons Termination Date would be automatically extended to the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders. The Lyons Investor Representative has agreed to immediately tender his resignation as a director of the Company, which the Board may accept or reject in its sole discretion, upon the earliest of the following: (i) the Lyons Termination Date; (ii) the sale or other transfer by the Lyons Investors of Common Stock that results in the Lyons Investors’ net long ownership of the Common Stock falling below 80% of their ownership net long aggregate ownership of the Common Stock as of the date of the Lyons Agreement, with certain adjustments and exceptions as set forth in the Lyons Agreement; and (iii) the Lyons Investors’ failure to cure a material breach of the Lyons Agreement pursuant to the Lyons Agreement.

The Don R. Daseke Agreement

On December 23, 2020, the Company entered into a board agreement (the “Don R. Daseke Agreement”) with The Walden Group, Inc. and Don R. Daseke (collectively with their respective affiliates, the “Don R. Daseke Investors”). The Don R. Daseke Investors beneficially owned approximately 28% of the Common Stock in the aggregate as of the date of the Don R. Daseke Agreement. Pursuant to the Don R. Daseke Agreement, prior to the Don R. Daseke Termination Date (as defined below), the Company will, with respect to any annual meeting of stockholders, include Mr. Daseke in its proxy materials as a director nominee proposed by the Board, recommend his election to the Company’s stockholders and solicit proxies in favor of his election.

With certain exceptions relating to breaches of the Don R. Daseke Agreement, the Don R. Daseke Agreement terminates after the Company or the Don R. Daseke Investors deliver a notice of termination at any time after the date of the Company’s second annual meeting of stockholders following the date of the Don R. Daseke Agreement, subject to the terminating party providing at least 30 days’ advance notice (the effective date of such termination, the “Don R. Daseke Termination Date”); provided, however, that in the event that the Don R. Daseke Investors sell or otherwise transfer their shares of Common Stock in any transaction that would result in the Don R. Daseke Investors’ net long aggregate ownership of the Common Stock falling below 30% of the Don R. Daseke Investors’ net long aggregate ownership of the Common Stock as of the date of the Don R. Daseke Agreement, with certain adjustments and exceptions as set forth in the Don R. Daseke Agreement, without the prior written approval of the Board, the Company’s obligations to the Don R. Daseke Investors pursuant to the Don R. Daseke Agreement will terminate immediately.

Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC Listing Rules (the “NASDAQ Listing Rules”). The members of the Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) are Messrs. Bonner, Garbers and Serianni and Ms. Lovett. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the additional independence standards set forth in the NASDAQ Listing Rules applicable to members of audit committees. The Board has also determined that Ms. Lovett and Mr. Serianni each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules.

5

Table of Contents

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of the Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These reporting persons are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of such forms, we believe that all required Section 16 reports were timely filed during 2021 and in prior years by our directors and executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Common Stock, except as previously disclosed and except that Mr. Shepko filed a Form 4 on June 2, 2021 to report the vesting of a prior restricted stock unit award that was required to be reported by September 8, 2020.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our officers and directors. A copy of the code of ethics is available free of charge on the Investors section of our website at http://www.daseke.com. In addition, a copy of the code of ethics will be provided without charge upon request to us. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to amendments to or waivers from any provision of the code of ethics applicable to such persons by posting such information on our website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Compensation Overview

This information provided in this Item 11 provides information about our rationale and policies with regard to the compensation of the executive officers who are our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs” for 2021 and is intended to provide investors with the material information necessary for understanding our compensation policies and decisions regarding our NEOs as well as providing context for the tabular disclosure provided in the executive compensation tables below. Our NEOs for 2021 are anyone who served as our principal executive officer during 2021 and our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving at the end of 2021 other than our principal executive officer.

For 2021, our NEOs were:

______________________

Our executive compensation program has been designed to attract and retain individuals with the background and skills necessary to successfully execute our strategy in a demanding environment, to motivate those individuals to reach near-term and long-term goals in a way that aligns their interests with those of our stockholders, and to reward success in reaching such goals. We use three primary elements of compensation to fulfill that design: base salaries, annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards. Annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards (as opposed to base salary) represent the performance-driven elements of our compensation program. They are also flexible in application and can be tailored to meet our objectives. The determination of each individual’s annual cash bonus reflects our belief as to the NEO’s relative contribution to achieving or exceeding specified annual goals. The determination of each NEO’s specific long-term equity incentive awards, which for 2021 consisted of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) with multi-year vesting periods, is based on the NEO’s expected long-term contributions. We believe that providing our NEOs with long-term incentive awards in the form of equity compensation such as RSUs and PSUs, further aligns the interests of our NEOs with the long-term interests of our stockholders because the value of such awards to our NEOs is directly tied to the value of the Common Stock.

We also provide a basic benefits package generally to all employees, including our NEOs, which includes a company-sponsored 401(k) plan and health, disability and life insurance.

6

Table of Contents

Elements of 2021 Compensation

We strive to recruit and retain talented and experienced leaders who will support the Company’s mission and values. To accomplish this overarching goal, the Company’s executive compensation philosophy aims to properly motivate management with an easy-to-comprehend compensation package that seeks to provide our NEOs with competitive base salaries, annual cash bonuses and long-term equity-based compensation awards. Our NEOs also receive certain retirement, health, welfare and additional benefits as described below.

7

Table of Contents

Compensation Best Practices

The Company maintains compensation arrangements intended to enhance returns to stockholders and include sound corporate governance features. We have listed below some of the more significant governance practices that we have adopted and the practices we have avoided, which we believe promote responsible pay and governance principles and alignment with our stockholders’ interests.

Process for Determining Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company. The Compensation Committee uses several different tools and resources in reviewing elements of executive compensation and making compensation decisions, including our compensation consultant noted below. These decisions, however, are not purely formulaic, and the Compensation Committee exercises judgment and discretion as appropriate, taking into consideration our financial results, culture, goals and initiatives and whether each particular element provides an appropriate incentive and reward for performance that sustains and enhances long-term stockholder value. Included in these considerations is an assessment of the executive officer’s current total compensation, leadership, integrity, individual performance, prospect for future performance, years of experience, skill set and contributions to our financial results and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee considers input from our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) in making determinations regarding our executive compensation program and the individual compensation of each executive officer, other than our CEO. Our CEO and management team also provide information to the Compensation Committee regarding the performance of the Company for the determination of annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive equity awards. The Compensation Committee makes the final determination of NEO compensation. Our CEO makes no recommendations regarding, and does not participate in discussions about, his own compensation.

The Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), an independent compensation consultant, to assist the Compensation Committee in assessing and determining executive compensation for 2021. In 2021, Meridian assisted the Compensation Committee by providing competitive compensation data to

8

Table of Contents

assist in pay determinations, assessing the design of our short-term and long-term incentive programs, providing information on trends in executive compensation and governance, and establishing a compensation peer group and a peer group for purposes of determining relative total shareholder return. The Compensation Committee took into account the information provided by Meridian to determine executive compensation for 2021.

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses compensation data for our CEO and our other NEOs as compared to compensation data for similarly situated executive officers at peer companies selected and recommended by the compensation consultant and approved by the Compensation Committee. The compensation consultant recommends peer companies that are similar in size (as measured by revenues) and have similar lines of business to the Company (i.e., transportation and logistics companies) and/or have a similar market capitalization.

In advance of 2021 compensation determinations, the Compensation Committee worked with Meridian to develop our peer groups using the factors noted above. The following companies comprised the 2021 compensation peer group: Apogee Enterprises, Inc.; ArcBest Corporation; Cubic Corporation; Echo Global Logistics, Inc.; Forward Air Corporation; Gibraltar Industries, Inc.; Hub Group, Inc.; Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.; Landstar System, Inc.; Schneider National, Inc.; U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.; USA Truck, Inc. and Werner Enterprises, Inc. The following companies comprised the 2021 peer group for purposes of measuring the Company’s relative total shareholder return: ArcBest Corporation; Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.; Heartland Express, Inc.; Hub Group, Inc.; Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.; Landstar System, Inc.; Marten Transport, Ltd.; Saia, Inc.; Schneider National, Inc.; Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.; U.S. Express Enterprises, Inc.; USA Truck, Inc. and Werner Enterprises, Inc. On an annual basis, the compensation consultant and the Compensation Committee review the appropriateness of the peer group. The Compensation Committee believes the comparator groups for 2021 are appropriate because they reflect the Company’s market for executive talent and customers and are aligned with the Company’s scope of operations and complexity.

Changes to Our Program in 2021

In 2021, the Compensation Committee decided that our executive compensation program in its current form should be modified prospectively to better meet our objectives, and has accordingly implemented the following modifications:

Agreements with Our Named Executive Officers

The Company is party to employment agreements with each of our three NEOs. The employment agreements provide for compensatory payments and benefits upon certain termination events, including termination events following a change in control. In addition, the employment agreements for Messrs. Bates and Williams provide for limited termination and change in control protections in connection with certain awards granted pursuant to the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “Incentive Plan”). These provisions are intended to allow our NEOs to more objectively manage the Company and serve as a recruiting and retention tool. Pursuant to their employment agreements, our NEOs are subject to certain post-termination restrictions, including confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations. For a description of the terms of the employment agreements with each of our NEOs, please see the section below entitled “—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table.” For a more complete description of our obligations under the employment agreements in the event of a

9

Table of Contents

termination of employment or change in control, please see the section below entitled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee and the Company review and consider the tax, accounting and securities law implications of our compensation programs.

Section 162(m)—When setting executive compensation, we consider many factors, such as attracting and retaining executives and providing appropriate performance incentives. We also consider the after-tax cost to the Company in establishing executive compensation programs, both individually and in the aggregate, but tax deductibility is not our sole consideration. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million (per individual) paid to their chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (as well as certain other officers who were covered employees in years after 2016). The 2017 Tax Act eliminated most of the exceptions from the $1 million deduction limit, except for certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. As a result, compensation payable to our NEOs in excess of $1 million per person in a year will generally not be fully deductible.

Accounting for Executive Compensation—Currently, we account for all equity-based compensation under the rules of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). This rule requires us to estimate the expense of each equity award over the vesting period of the award and record it as such. We are also obligated to record cash-based awards as an expense at the time our payment obligation is accrued.

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 concerning compensation of our NEOs.

10

Table of Contents

______________________

______________________

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table

Employment Agreements with Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams

In August 2021, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Shepko, which provides, among other things, that: (i) Mr. Shepko will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and will perform the duties assigned to him by the Board; (ii) Mr. Shepko’s employment will be on an at-will basis and there will be no fixed employment period; (iii) Mr. Shepko was entitled to an annual base salary (currently $800,000); (iv) Mr. Shepko will be eligible to earn an annual discretionary bonus with a target value of 100% of his base salary; and (v) Mr. Shepko received a sign-on award in the form of a one-time cash payment of $466,666.

11

Table of Contents

In April 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bates, pursuant to which, among other things: (i) Mr. Bates will serve as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and will perform the duties assigned to him by the Board or the Chief Executive Officer or their respective designees; (ii) Mr. Bates’ employment will be on an at-will basis and there will be no fixed employment period; (iii) Mr. Bates was entitled to an annual base salary (currently $450,000); (iv) Mr. Bates will be eligible to earn an annual discretionary bonus with target value of 75% of his base salary; (v) Mr. Bates would be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan, with a target annual award having a grant date fair value equal to 80% of Mr. Bates’ base salary, which for 2020 consisted entirely of non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 223,600 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $1.38 per share that are scheduled to vest in three equal annual installments, subject to Mr. Bates’ continued employment (the “Bates 2020 Target Award”), and providing that the grant date fair value for the target annual awards in years after 2022 would be equal to at least 120% of Mr. Bates’ base salary and would be reviewed by the Board for increase; (vi) Mr. Bates received a one-time equity award in 2020 (the “Bates Turn-Around Award”) consisting entirely of 388,500 PSUs that are eligible to vest at the end of a three-year performance period subject to the achievement of specified stock price hurdles and Mr. Bates’ continued employment; (vii) Mr. Bates received a one-time award of non-qualified stock options in 2020 to purchase up to 186,300 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $1.38 per share that are scheduled to vest in three equal annual installments, subject to Mr. Bates’ continued employment (the “Bates Make-Whole Award”); (viii) Mr. Bates received a sign-on award in the form of a one-time cash payment of $75,000; and (ix) Mr. Bates was entitled to a one-time cash payment of $250,000 to serve as a signing bonus that could be used to assist with relocation expenses. The Bates 2020 Target Award, the Bates Turn-Around Award and the Bates Make-Whole Award also provide for accelerated vesting of outstanding awards under limited circumstances, which are described in more detail below in the section titled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In May 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Williams, pursuant to which, among other things: (i) Mr. Williams will serve as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and will perform the duties assigned to him by the Board or the Chief Executive Officer or their respective designees; (ii) Mr. Williams’ employment will be on an at-will basis and there will be no fixed employment period; (iii) Mr. Williams was entitled to an annual base salary (currently $561,750); (iv) Mr. Williams will be eligible to earn an annual discretionary bonus with target value of 75% of his base salary; (v) Mr. Williams would be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan, with a target annual award having a grant date fair value equal to 80% of Mr. Williams’ base salary, which for 2020 consisted entirely of non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 260,900 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $1.41 per share that are scheduled to vest in three equal annual installments, subject to Mr. Williams’ continued employment (the “Williams 2020 Target Award”), and providing that the grant date fair value for the target annual awards in years after 2022 would be equal to at least 120% of Mr. Williams’ base salary and would be reviewed by the Board for increase; (vi) Mr. Williams received a one-time equity award in 2020 (the “Williams Turn-Around Award”) consisting entirely of 453,200 PSUs that are eligible to vest at the end of a three-year performance period subject to the achievement of specified stock price hurdles and Mr. Williams’ continued employment; and (vii) Mr. Williams received a one-time grant of non-qualified stock options in 2020 to purchase up to 310,600 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price of $1.41 per share that are scheduled to vest in three equal annual installments, subject to Mr. Williams’ continued employment (the “Williams Promotion Award”); and (viii) Mr. Williams will be entitled to receive a $300,000 retention award in cash if his employment agreement has not been terminated as of May 6, 2023. The Williams 2020 Target Award, the Williams Turn-Around Award and the Williams Promotion Award also provide for accelerated vesting of outstanding awards under limited circumstances, which are described in more detail below in the section titled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” If the Incentive Plan does not contain a sufficient number of shares under the Williams 2020 Target Award, the Williams Turn-Around Award and the Williams Promotion Award, the awards will be settled in cash.

Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams are able to participate in the same benefit plans in which other senior executives of the Company are eligible to participate.

Also pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams are entitled to severance payments in certain limited circumstances. Such severance benefits are described in more detail below in the section titled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

12

Table of Contents

The employment agreements with Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams contain a “clawback” provision that enables the Company to recoup any amounts paid to the executive as an annual bonus (and, for Messrs. Bates and Williams, any incentive compensation) under the employment agreement if so required by applicable law, any clawback policy adopted by the Company and any applicable securities exchange listing standards. None of the employment agreements with Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams provide for any tax gross-up payments. If amounts payable to Messrs. Shepko, Bates or Williams under their employment agreements or otherwise exceed the amount allowed under Section 280G of the Code for such executive (thereby subjecting the executive to an excise tax), then such payments due to Messrs. Shepko, Bates or Williams under their employment agreements will either (i) be reduced (but not below zero) so that the aggregate present value of the payments and benefits received by the executive is $1.00 less than the amount which would otherwise cause Messrs. Bates or Williams to incur an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or (ii) be paid in full, whichever produces the better net after-tax position to the executive.

Each executive is also subject to general confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations in his employment agreement, as well as non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions during employment and for 18 months thereafter; provided, that if Mr. Williams terminates his employment agreement for convenience and the Company decides to pay him a discretionary severance payment (as described in more detail below in the section titled “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”), his post-termination restricted period will equal the number of months in which the Company pays such discretionary severance payment.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table reflects information regarding outstanding equity-based awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2021.

_______________________

13

Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreements with Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams

As described above in the section entitled “—Narrative to Summary Compensation Table,” we have entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams. The following summarizes the impact of certain termination events or the occurrence of a change in control on each NEO’s entitlement to severance and other benefits under these employment agreements.

If the employment of Messrs. Shepko, Bates or Williams is terminated by the Company for cause or by the executive without good reason, such executive will be entitled to receive (i) all accrued base salary and accrued but unused vacation through the date of termination, (ii) any post-employment benefits due under the terms and conditions of the Company’s benefits plans, and (iii) for Mr. Shepko, any earned but unpaid annual bonus. The applicable executive will not be entitled to any additional amounts or benefits as the result of a termination of employment for cause or by the executive without good reason.

14

Table of Contents

If the employment of Mr. Shepko is terminated by the Company without cause or if he resigns for good reason, Mr. Shepko will be entitled to, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company and continued compliance with restrictive covenants, (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the pro rata portion of his target annual bonus for the year in which his employment terminates (the “Severance Payment”), and (ii) up to 24 months of Company-subsidized COBRA coverage; provided, however, that if such termination occurs after a change in control and is on or before December 31, 2022, the Severance Payment will instead be equal to Mr. Shepko’s target annual bonus for the 2022 bonus year plus his annual base salary for 2022 (less any amounts of base salary already paid to him if the termination date occurs in 2022).

If Mr. Shepko’s employment is terminated due to his death or disability, he will be entitled to the pro rata portion of his target annual bonus for the year in which his employment terminates.

If the employment of Messrs. Bates or Williams is terminated by the Company without cause or if Messrs. Bates or Williams resign for good reason, the applicable executive will be entitled to, subject to the execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company and continued compliance with restrictive covenants: (i) a payment equal to the sum of (A) 18 months of base salary plus (B) a pro rata portion of the applicable executive’s target annual bonus for the year in which he is terminated, payable in substantially equal installments over the 18-month period following such termination; (ii) up to 18 months of Company-subsidized COBRA coverage; and (iii) the accelerated vesting of any outstanding equity awards, with performance-based conditions vesting on actual achievement of the applicable performance-based conditions, except for the Bates 2020 Target Award, the Bates Turn-Around Award, the Bates Make-Whole Award, the Williams 2020 Target Award, the Williams Turn-Around Award and the Williams Promotion Award, which provide for accelerated vesting in the circumstances described below. If Mr. Williams terminates his employment agreement for convenience after May 6, 2023, the Company may elect to pay Mr. Williams a discretionary severance payment equal to his monthly base salary for up to 18 months following such termination in order to extend his post-termination restricted period, as described above.

If the employment of Messrs. Bates or Williams is terminated due to his death or disability, such executive will be entitled to: (i) a pro rata portion of his target annual bonus for the year in which he is terminated; (ii) up to 18 months of Company-subsidized COBRA coverage; and (iii) the accelerated vesting of any outstanding equity awards that would have vested in the year of termination, with performance-based conditions vesting on actual achievement of the applicable performance-based conditions, except for the Bates 2020 Target Award, the Bates Turn-Around Award, the Bates Make-Whole Award, the Williams 2020 Target Award, the Williams Turn-Around Award and the Williams Promotion Award, which provide for accelerated vesting in the circumstances described below.

Under his employment agreement, “good reason” for Mr. Shepko generally means the occurrence of any of the following, without his consent: (i) a material reduction in base salary; (ii) a material diminution in his position, reporting relationship to the Board, responsibilities or duties or the assignment of him to a position, responsibilities or duties of a materially lesser status or degree of responsibility than his position, responsibilities or duties; (iii) requirement that Mr. Shepko be based anywhere more than 40 miles from the office where he is located on the effective date of the employment agreement; or (iv) any material breach by the Company of the employment agreement or any other material agreement between the Company and Mr. Shepko.

Under their employment agreements, “good reason” for each of Messrs. Bates and Williams generally means the occurrence of any of the following, without his consent: (i) a material reduction in base salary or target annual bonus, other than a general reduction in base salary or target annual bonus that affects all similarly situated executives in substantially the same proportions; (ii) a material diminution in his position, responsibilities or duties or the assignment of him to a position, responsibilities or duties of a materially lesser status or degree of responsibility than his position, responsibilities or duties; (iii) any material breach by the Company of any provision of his employment agreement; or (iv) for Mr. Bates, the required relocation or transfer of his regular work location to a location more than 40 miles from the Dallas-Ft. Worth metropolitan area.

15

Table of Contents

Under their employment agreements, “cause” for each of Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams generally means: (i) the commission by the executive of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, theft or embezzlement against the Company, its subsidiaries, affiliates or customers; (ii) the executive’s willful refusal without proper legal cause to faithfully and diligently perform his duties; (iii) the breach of the confidentiality, noncompetition, non-solicitation or intellectual property provisions in the executive’s employment agreement or the material breach of any other written agreement between the executive and one or more members of affiliated entities including the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries; (iv) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony (or state law equivalent) or any crime involving moral turpitude; (v) willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive in the performance of duties to the Company that has or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company; or (vi) the executive’s material breach and violation of the Company’s written policies pertaining to sexual harassment, discrimination or insider trading.

2017 Equity Awards

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Shepko’s 2017 option award (the “2017 Shepko Option Award”), upon a change in control, the unvested portion of the 2017 Shepko Option Award will become vested in full and exercisable. If Mr. Shepko’s service terminates due to his death or disability, the unvested portion of the 2017 Shepko Option Award that would have vested in the year of termination will become vested and exercisable.

2020 Equity Awards

Bates and Williams 2020 Target Awards

Pursuant to the terms of the Bates 2020 Target Award and Williams 2020 Target Award (collectively, the “2020 Target Awards”) upon (i) a change in control if no replacement award is provided, (ii) the respective NEO’s termination without cause, or (iii) the respective NEO’s resignation for good reason, the unvested portion of the 2020 Target Award will become vested in full and exercisable, in each case, subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company. If the NEO’s employment terminates due to his death or disability, the unvested portion of the 2020 Target Award that would have vested in the year of termination will become vested and exercisable.

Under the 2020 Target Awards, “change in control,” “good reason” and “cause” all have the same definitions as described above.

Bates and Williams Turn-Around Awards

Pursuant to the terms of the Bates Turn-Around Award and Williams Turn-Around Award (collectively, the “Turn-Around Awards”), upon a change in control if no replacement award is provided, the unvested portion of the Turn-Around Awards will time-vest in full. Further, pursuant to the terms of the Turn-Around Awards, upon (i) the respective NEO’s termination without cause, (ii) the respective NEO’s resignation for good reason, or (iii) the respective NEO’s death or disability, the unvested portion of the Target Awards will time-vest in full and performance-vest based on actual achievement of the applicable performance-based conditions, in each case, subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company.

Under the Turn-Around Awards, “change in control,” “good reason” and “cause” all have the same definitions as described above.

Bates Make-Whole Award

Pursuant to the terms of the Bates Make-Whole Award, upon (i) a change in control if no replacement award is provided, (ii) Mr. Bates’ termination without cause, or (iii) Mr. Bates’ resignation for good reason, the unvested portion of the Bates Make-Whole Award will become vested in full and exercisable, in each case, subject to Mr. Bates’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company. If Mr. Bates’ employment terminates due to his death or disability, the unvested portion of the Bates Make-Whole Award that would have vested in the year of termination will become vested and exercisable.

16

Table of Contents

Under the Bates Make-Whole Award, “change in control,” “good reason” and “cause” all have the same definitions as described above.

Williams Promotion Award

Pursuant to the terms of the Williams Promotion Award, upon (i) a change in control if no replacement award is provided, (ii) Mr. Williams’ termination without cause, or (iii) Mr. Williams’ resignation for good reason, the unvested portion of the Williams Promotion Award will become vested in full and exercisable, in each case, subject to Mr. Williams’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company. If Mr. Williams’ employment terminates due to his death or disability, the unvested portion of the Williams Promotion Award that would have vested in the year of termination will become vested and exercisable.

Under the Williams Promotion Award, “change in control,” “good reason” and “cause” all have the same definitions as described above.

2021 Equity Awards

Pursuant to the terms of the 2021 RSU awards made to Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams (collectively, the “2021 RSU Awards”), the unvested portion of the 2021 RSU Award will become vested in full upon (i) a change in control if no replacement award is provided or (ii) the respective NEO’s termination (a) by the Company without cause, (b) by the NEO for good reason or (c) due to the NEO’s death or disability, in each case, subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2021 PSU awards made to Messrs. Shepko, Bates and Williams (collectively, the “2021 PSU Awards” and, together with the 2021 RSU Awards, the “2021 Equity Awards”), upon a change in control, if no replacement award is provided and subject to the NEO’s continuous employment through the occurrence of the change in control, the 2021 PSU Award will immediately become time-vested and the achievement of all relevant performance goals will be determined based on the greater of actual achievement or the target of those goals at the time of the change in control. Upon the NEO’s termination (i) by the Company without cause, (ii) by the NEO for good reason or (iii) due to the NEO’s death or disability, in each case, subject to the NEO’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company, the 2021 PSU Award will be deemed to have time-vested as of the date of such termination and the achievement of all relevant performance goals will be determined based on the actual level achievement of those goals; provided, that (a) the number of any PSUs deemed to have become performance-vested shall be prorated to reflect the portion of the performance period that lapsed as of immediately prior the termination date, (b) the resulting number of PSUs following such proration shall be deemed the number of vested PSUs that shall be settled in accordance with the applicable award agreement and (c) any number of PSUs that are not settled in accordance with the applicable award agreement shall remain outstanding and subject to vesting and settlement notwithstanding the NEO’s termination.

Under the 2021 Equity Awards, “change in control” and “cause” are defined in the Incentive Plan, and “good reason” is defined in the applicable employment agreement.

Director Compensation

Annual Cash Compensation

Our directors who also serve as employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for their services as directors while serving as employees. Our non-employee directors receive (i) an annual retainer in the amount of $75,000, and (ii) as applicable, an annual fee for serving as the chair of the Audit Committee in the amount of $15,000, as the chair of the Compensation Committee in the amount of $10,000 and as the chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in the amount of $10,000. The annual retainer and committee chair fees are paid quarterly. Mr. Shepko became Interim Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2021 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer effective August 2, 2021, and no longer receives any Board retainers.

17

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation

In addition to the annual cash compensation described above, our independent directors also receive an annual stock award grant for each year of service on the Board of Directors. Due to the amendment to the Incentive Plan that occurred in 2021, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, our directors received two separate grants of RSUs, representing their 2021 annual stock award grant and their 2022 annual stock award grant.

The 2021 non-employee director annual stock awards were granted on June 1, 2021 and consisted of 6,906 RSUs worth $52,002 as of the grant date, each of which vested on January 1, 2022. The 2022 non-employee director annual stock awards were granted on December 31, 2021 and each consisted of 4,980 RSUs worth $49,999 as of the grant date, each of which vest on January 1, 2023.

The following table presents information regarding compensation earned by the non-employee directors for their Board service during the year ended December 31, 2021.

______________________

In addition, our non-employee directors are reimbursed for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board or committee meetings. Each director is indemnified for his or her actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.

18

Table of Contents

Process for Determining Non-Employee Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of director compensation and benefits, including cash, equity-based awards and other compensation. In determining non-employee director compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks advice from the independent compensation consultants who are retained by the Board to, among other functions, analyze compensation and develop initial recommendations as to the amount and form of compensation to be paid to the Company’s non-employee directors, including pay mix. Regarding compensation, the Compensation Committee’s advisor, Meridian, analyzes and compares the Company’s compensation program against the same peer group used to determine executive officer compensation as described above. Market data is obtained for each element of Board compensation. The Board then reviews this information with the compensation consultant, as well as any developing trends in director compensation and how the Board’s workload compares to that of the peer group directors, and establishes the go-forward Board compensation arrangements. In establishing the go-forward Board compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee considers the competitiveness of each element of compensation, as well as the competitiveness of total compensation. The Compensation Committee recommended that the Board approve the 2021 compensation package, and the Board approved the compensation package for 2021.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our executive officers currently serves, nor served at any time during 2021, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on the Board of Directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table reflects, as of December 31, 2021, information regarding compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.

______________________

19

Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of March 31, 2022 based on information filed with the SEC or obtained from the persons named below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, by:

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them.

20

Table of Contents

________________________

* Less than one percent.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Since January 1, 2020, other than the compensation arrangements, including employment, termination of employment and change in control arrangements, discussed in Item 11 of this Amendment No. 1, there have been no transactions, and there are no currently proposed transactions, in which (i) we have been or are to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeded or is expected to exceed $120,000, and (iii) any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, except Mr. Williams, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, has a 28% ownership interest in one of our customers from whom we received approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million in freight revenue for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

The Audit Committee must review and approve any related party transaction we propose to enter into in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. The Audit Committee charter details the policies and procedures relating to transactions that may present actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest and may raise questions as to whether such transactions are consistent with the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. A summary of such policies and procedures is set forth below.

21

Table of Contents

Any potential related party transaction that is brought to the Audit Committee’s attention will be analyzed by the Audit Committee, in consultation with outside counsel or members of management, as appropriate, to determine whether the transaction or relationship does, in fact, constitute a related party transaction. At its meetings, the Audit Committee will be provided with the details of each new, existing or proposed related party transaction, including the terms of the transaction, the business purpose of the transaction and the benefits to us and to the relevant related party.

In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Audit Committee must consider, among other factors, the following factors to the extent relevant:

Any member of the Audit Committee who has an interest in the transaction under discussion must abstain from voting on the approval of the transaction, but may, if so requested by the chairman of the Audit Committee, participate in some or all of the Audit Committee’s discussions of the transaction. Upon completion of its review of the transaction, the Audit Committee may determine to permit or to prohibit the transaction.

Director Independence

The Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, the Board has determined that none of our directors (other than Messrs. Daseke and Shepko) have relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of our directors (other than Messrs. Daseke and Shepko) is “independent” as that term is defined by The Nasdaq Listing Rules. In addition, the Board previously determined that Mr. Charlton, who served on the Board until his resignation in January 2021, and Mr. Hennessy, who served on the Board until his resignation in June 2021, had no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and were “independent” as that term is defined by the NASDAQ Listing Rules during the time they served on the Board. In making these determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each director has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant in determining each director’s independence and eligibility to serve on the committees of the Board.

There are no family relationships among any directors or executive officers.

22

Table of Contents

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following is a summary of fees paid to Grant Thornton LLP (Dallas, Texas; PCAOB ID Number 248) (“Grant Thornton”) for audit, audit related and tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021.

Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our year-end financial statements and services provided in connection with regulatory filings and includes interim procedures, quarterly reviews and audit fees, as well as attendance at Audit Committee meetings.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related services consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of fees billed for tax return preparation and tax planning and advice.

_________________________

The Audit Committee determined that the services provided by Grant Thornton were compatible with Grant Thornton’s independence as the independent registered public accounting firm during 2020 and 2021.

Pre-Approval Policy

Since the formation of the Audit Committee, and on a going-forward basis, the Audit Committee has and will pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our auditors, including the fees and terms thereof (subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in the Exchange Act which are approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit).

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” are filed as part of the Original Report.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

There are no financial statement schedules filed as part of this Amendment No. 1, since the required information is included in the financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of the Original Report or the circumstances requiring inclusion of such schedules are not present.

23

Table of Contents

(3) Exhibits

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

26

Table of Contents

27

Table of Contents

28

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

29